Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28

Thread: 10 JAN 16 - OpenCarry.org Press Release - Texas Licensed Open Carry is Not Enough!

  1. #1
    Moderator / Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    8,711

    10 JAN 16 - OpenCarry.org Press Release - Texas Licensed Open Carry is Not Enough!

    OpenCarry.org

    A national gun rights community with over 39,000 registered members focused on the right to openly carry properly holstered handguns in daily American life.

    **********************************
    For Immediate Release – January 10, 2016
    **********************************

    OpenCarry.org Congratulates Texas for Legalizing the Open Carry of Properly Holstered Handguns
    ---
    But Licensed Open Carry is Not Enough!
    ---
    Gun Owners Will Boycott and Selectively Picket Businesses which do not Respect the Right to Choose Open or Concealed Carry
    ---
    And Kevin Laurence, the executive director of the Texas Municipal Police Association, needs to read the US Supreme Court's opinion in Delaware v. Prouse (1979) (holding that the police may not seize citizens just to check for licenses). ---

    . . .

    See full press release at attachment.
    Last edited by Mike; 01-10-2016 at 05:05 PM.

  2. #2
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    34,616
    Without a doubt, there is more work to be done. Texans deserve more.
    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training.” Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    A link to the deleware v. prouse SCOTUS decision would be nice.

  4. #4
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    34,616
    Quote Originally Posted by davidmcbeth View Post
    A link to the deleware v. prouse SCOTUS decision would be nice.
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/440/648
    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training.” Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  5. #5
    Accomplished Advocate BB62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    3,887
    I understand the court's ruling as it applies to driving a car (and of course nevermind sobriety "checkpoints" - grrr), but in the case of driving a car, the officer is supposed to see something illegal before stopping an individual.

    In the case of licensed OC, doesn't the officer see something illegal, except for the fact that the person may possess a CHL - therefore allowing a stop?

    I *may* see the difference, but I don't trust a court or a jury to make the necessary distinction.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    58
    Here in TX, IMO, it is time to rest on our laurels for a bit. We won a partial victory, now we need to solidify our support.
    The support we need comes from people who do not see a reason for open carry. Most do not see a need for CC, but it does not bother them either way. The folks who will join any protest just because it sounds fun will never join our cause. The libs will never join us. We need the businessman, truck driver, the single mom who worries about walking to her car after work. The only way we will win them over is with quiet, unobtrusive reasoning. Or if they get mugged.

    The TX Legislature does not meet this year anyway. The people we need are the type that will let you do what you want, just do not shove it in their face. Two guys holding hands walking down the street and they will shake their heads a bit. A gay pride parade every weekend down Main Street, and they will pour money, time and sweat into restricting it. Let open carry become normal and accepted first. Small steps, as long as we keep going in the right direction.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    pottsboro,texas
    Posts
    200
    Quote Originally Posted by hovercat View Post
    Here in TX, IMO, it is time to rest on our laurels for a bit. We won a partial victory, now we need to solidify our support.
    The support we need comes from people who do not see a reason for open carry. Most do not see a need for CC, but it does not bother them either way. The folks who will join any protest just because it sounds fun will never join our cause. The libs will never join us. We need the businessman, truck driver, the single mom who worries about walking to her car after work. The only way we will win them over is with quiet, unobtrusive reasoning. Or if they get mugged.

    The TX Legislature does not meet this year anyway. The people we need are the type that will let you do what you want, just do not shove it in their face. Two guys holding hands walking down the street and they will shake their heads a bit. A gay pride parade every weekend down Main Street, and they will pour money, time and sweat into restricting it. Let open carry become normal and accepted first. Small steps, as long as we keep going in the right direction.
    well here is your businessman /truck driver I drive a truck and for years I have encouraging and educating truckers about the truth of trucks and guns ,the problem is that most company drivers can't carry because of company rules ,so the drivers that I have been able to reach are mostly owner/ops and their drivers . most of the time I get a crowd gathered when they see me getting out of the trk o-carrying and when one person comes up asking then others quickly follow. so that shows a large interest amongst the trucking community. you are on a right track in your thoughts of reaching out to them . now as for texas goes , I have been in several walmarts , waffle houses ( hit wh on weekends at breakfast ,busy time) q t's and except for the first Walmart (minor issus) has been no issues however I have yet seen another o carrier.
    Our ancesters, veterens, and people of the service gave and are giving their time and sacrifice to preserve and defend our rights . it''s up to us the people to show appreciation by not sacrificing but investing time to exercise and preserve those rights.......the bushwacker...

  8. #8
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    34,616
    Quote Originally Posted by bushwacker View Post
    well here is your businessman /truck driver I drive a truck and for years I have encouraging and educating truckers about the truth of trucks and guns ,the problem is that most company drivers can't carry because of company rules ,so the drivers that I have been able to reach are mostly owner/ops and their drivers . most of the time I get a crowd gathered when they see me getting out of the trk o-carrying and when one person comes up asking then others quickly follow. so that shows a large interest amongst the trucking community. you are on a right track in your thoughts of reaching out to them . now as for texas goes , I have been in several walmarts , waffle houses ( hit wh on weekends at breakfast ,busy time) q t's and except for the first Walmart (minor issus) has been no issues however I have yet seen another o carrier.
    Waffle House has available all the basic food groups = grease, sugar, and grits. Adding the humor of their vendor/employee (my interpretation) no guns sign increases the possibilities exponentially.
    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training.” Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Granite State of Mind
    Posts
    4,510
    Quote Originally Posted by BB62 View Post
    I understand the court's ruling as it applies to driving a car (and of course nevermind sobriety "checkpoints" - grrr), but in the case of driving a car, the officer is supposed to see something illegal before stopping an individual.

    In the case of licensed OC, doesn't the officer see something illegal, except for the fact that the person may possess a CHL - therefore allowing a stop?

    I *may* see the difference, but I don't trust a court or a jury to make the necessary distinction.
    In the case of driving a car, doesn't the officer see something illegal, except for the fact that the person may possess a driver license?

  10. #10
    Accomplished Advocate BB62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    3,887
    Quote Originally Posted by KBCraig View Post
    In the case of driving a car, doesn't the officer see something illegal, except for the fact that the person may possess a driver license?
    Exactly my point.

  11. #11
    Centurion
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ellis County, Texas, USA
    Posts
    275

    Agreed!

    Quote Originally Posted by hovercat View Post
    Here in TX, IMO, it is time to rest on our laurels for a bit. We won a partial victory, now we need to solidify our support.
    The support we need comes from people who do not see a reason for open carry. Most do not see a need for CC, but it does not bother them either way. The folks who will join any protest just because it sounds fun will never join our cause. The libs will never join us. We need the businessman, truck driver, the single mom who worries about walking to her car after work. The only way we will win them over is with quiet, unobtrusive reasoning. Or if they get mugged.

    The TX Legislature does not meet this year anyway. The people we need are the type that will let you do what you want, just do not shove it in their face. Two guys holding hands walking down the street and they will shake their heads a bit. A gay pride parade every weekend down Main Street, and they will pour money, time and sweat into restricting it. Let open carry become normal and accepted first. Small steps, as long as we keep going in the right direction.
    Agreed. We need to build support by showing that OC can be just another form of carry as folks go about their everyday business. We don't need drama or news cameras. Quiet, one-on-one persuasion is the key.

    SA-TX

  12. #12
    Centurion
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ellis County, Texas, USA
    Posts
    275

    Picketing Businessethat Post 30.07

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    OpenCarry.org

    A national gun rights community with over 39,000 registered members focused on the right to openly carry properly holstered handguns in daily American life.

    **********************************
    For Immediate Release – January 10, 2016
    **********************************

    OpenCarry.org Congratulates Texas for Legalizing the Open Carry of Properly Holstered Handguns
    ---
    But Licensed Open Carry is Not Enough!
    ---
    Gun Owners Will Boycott and Selectively Picket Businesses which do not Respect the Right to Choose Open or Concealed Carry
    ---
    And Kevin Laurence, the executive director of the Texas Municipal Police Association, needs to read the US Supreme Court's opinion in Delaware v. Prouse (1979) (holding that the police may not seize citizens just to check for licenses). ---

    . . .

    See full press release at attachment.

    Mike, as a Texan who has worked with you and TSRA since 2009 to advance gun rights and OC, I must say that I have concerns about this approach. I agree with people not patronizing posted businesses. Even better is to tell them why, try to convince them otherwise and failing that to also praise the the non-posting businesses you choose instead.

    My observation about signs is that the post rate is directly proportional to the media attention surrounding gun carry. When corporate PR departments and attorneys get involved due to inquires from the news media, that is usually a bad sign. Sonic comes to mind. We've seen this in the past with changes in law that have been widely publicized. Publicity tends to equal postings. Many of the new 30.07 signs were put up in anticipation of OC not in reaction to actual OCers. Most businesses don't give a hoot about CC or OC, are oblivious, and if not prodded won't post anything. Honestly, I fear this maybe counterproductive.

    In the past we needed to get the attention of the public and lawmakers to legalize OC. Mission accomplished but I believe now is the time for different tactics. Diplomacy, persuasion, normalization, and low-key one-on-one engagement would be my recommendation. Rather than picketing a restaurant that has posted 30.07, how about someone talk to management and say " I have a lunch gathering for 10/20/30 (whatever) but we want to sit on the patio and enjoy the Texas sunshine with our guns uncovered. How about taking down the 30.07 sign & giving it a try? If we are both happy with the outcome, there maybe thers are more opportunities like this." Especially if the place is only posted 30.07, he/she is tacitly supportive of CC. We just need to convince him/her that OC isn't a scary terrible thing. This reminds me very much of the gatherings I've read about in VA and PA that seemed to be very successful.

    If the spotlight can be removed and people just go about their business OCing, it will become "Move along, nothing to see here". Protests and picketing (and counter protests by MDA & Brady Bunch) are the very opposite of this quiet, slow-but-steady assimilation approach. Texans are friendly by nature and that trait can definitely work to our benefit. Similarly, they are ornery and fierce when cornered or pulled into a confrontation that they don't want and that most definitely would not.

    SA-TX

  13. #13
    Accomplished Advocate BB62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    3,887
    Quote Originally Posted by SA-TX View Post
    My observation about signs is that the post rate is directly proportional to the media attention surrounding gun carry. When corporate PR departments and attorneys get involved due to inquires from the news media, that is usually a bad sign. Sonic comes to mind. ...
    Hold on a second, there, pardner! Let's call things as they are/were, shall we?

    Didn't the media "get involved" with Sonic because of the promotional activities of the Lying Mommies (Moms Demand Action)?

    Of course, it would be nice to have this discussion/argument over on TexasCHLforum, where you made an identical post, but the sensibilities over there aren't exactly amenable to such things, are they?

  14. #14
    Regular Member solus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    here nc
    Posts
    6,880
    Quote Originally Posted by BB62 View Post
    Hold on a second, there, pardner! Let's call things as they are/were, shall we?

    Didn't the media "get involved" with Sonic because of the promotional activities of the Lying Mommies (Moms Demand Action)?

    Of course, it would be nice to have this discussion/argument over on TexasCHLforum, where you made an identical post, but the sensibilities over there aren't exactly amenable to such things, are they?
    sorry thought sonic (and a gaggle of other national chains got excited by the LGOC folk during the let's be 'in your face' mode of the FAILED OCT campaign...

    ipse
    I'm only human; I do what I can; I'm just a man; I do what I can; Don't put the blame on me; Don't put your blame on me ~ Rag'n'Bone Man.

    Please do not get confused between my personality & my attitude. My personality is who I am ~ my attitude depends on who you are and how you act.

    Remember always, do not judge someone because they sin differently than you do!

    Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain

  15. #15
    Centurion
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ellis County, Texas, USA
    Posts
    275

    Picketing Businesses

    Quote Originally Posted by solus View Post
    sorry thought sonic (and a gaggle of other national chains got excited by the LGOC folk during the let's be 'in your face' mode of the FAILED OCT campaign...

    ipse
    Correct. Sonic & others didn't like LGOC and the publicity caused them to issue a corporate statement. Businesses, in general don't want to be the rope in a game of tug-of-war between pro 2A and anti-2A groups. This is why I am concerned about the announced strategy and think that low-key, 1:1 approach would be better.

    As the other responder said, I did post the same thing on texaschlforum.com as that group is very interested in getting to come down as well. As for being a different crowd, that's true, but there are plenty of OCersthere as well as those who support OC even if they choose not to do so.

    SA-TX

  16. #16
    Regular Member stealthyeliminator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,318
    Quote Originally Posted by solus View Post
    sorry thought sonic (and a gaggle of other national chains got excited by the LGOC folk during the let's be 'in your face' mode of the FAILED OCT campaign...

    ipse
    Quote Originally Posted by SA-TX View Post
    Correct. Sonic & others didn't like LGOC and the publicity caused them to issue a corporate statement. Businesses, in general don't want to be the rope in a game of tug-of-war between pro 2A and anti-2A groups. This is why I am concerned about the announced strategy and think that low-key, 1:1 approach would be better.

    As the other responder said, I did post the same thing on texaschlforum.com as that group is very interested in getting to come down as well. As for being a different crowd, that's true, but there are plenty of OCersthere as well as those who support OC even if they choose not to do so.

    SA-TX
    Correct? No... The judgment from our friend across the country is faulty and uninformed. As I'm sure he is completely unaware, the LGOC methods have been and continue to be largely successful.

    No matter how "soft" your methods, somebody is going to bellyache and blow it out of proportion. Things got done quickly so far as getting some form of HGOC passed, but not until OCT was on the scene. Prior to that, things were moving about as fast as molasses, as plenty of members here should be able to attest to.

    As far as Sonic is concerned specifically, I can't recall seeing any signs at the ones I have visited... On the contrary, I can recall doing some activism in front of one and subsequently eating there. Go figure. Maybe solus, all the way over in NC, just doesn't know what the **** he's talking about. :shrugs:
    Advocate freedom please

  17. #17
    Regular Member solus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    here nc
    Posts
    6,880
    Quote Originally Posted by stealthyeliminator View Post
    Correct? No... The judgment from our friend across the country is faulty and uninformed. As I'm sure he is completely unaware, the LGOC methods have been and continue to be largely successful.

    No matter how "soft" your methods, somebody is going to bellyache and blow it out of proportion. Things got done quickly so far as getting some form of HGOC passed, but not until OCT was on the scene. Prior to that, things were moving about as fast as molasses, as plenty of members here should be able to attest to.

    As far as Sonic is concerned specifically, I can't recall seeing any signs at the ones I have visited... On the contrary, I can recall doing some activism in front of one and subsequently eating there. Go figure. Maybe solus, all the way over in NC, just doesn't know what the **** he's talking about. :shrugs:
    sorry, this has been hashed, rehashed numerous times on this forum. you stealth, even in face of direct cites from 1) multiple national news agencies & numerous responses from national corp organizations stating either a new or refined modifying their firearm policy. 2) Texas firearms entities publicly stating their LGOC campaign was a mistake and caused national repercussions yet fail to acknowledge that ~ for whatever reason.

    your deflection based on your standard mantra of 'they don't know what they are talking about' is amazing.

    but i noticed you didn't provide any cite disputing my statement.

    ipse

    added: i realized i failed to provide cites myself:

    motherjones ~ http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...backlash-texas
    quote: THE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS have been rough for proponents of open-carry gun laws. No fewer than seven restaurant chains have taken a stand against firearms being brought to their businesses, after activists in Texas conducted provocative demonstrations in which they toted semi-automatic rifles into various eateries. unquote.

    motherjones ~ http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...s-sonic-videos
    quote: No fewer than five national food and beverage chains have now told them to get rid of their guns or get lost, including Starbucks, Wendy’s, Applebees, Jack in the Box, and Chipotle. unquote

    if you wish, i can review the other cites i have and provide them as necessary.
    Last edited by solus; 01-21-2016 at 09:03 PM.
    I'm only human; I do what I can; I'm just a man; I do what I can; Don't put the blame on me; Don't put your blame on me ~ Rag'n'Bone Man.

    Please do not get confused between my personality & my attitude. My personality is who I am ~ my attitude depends on who you are and how you act.

    Remember always, do not judge someone because they sin differently than you do!

    Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain

  18. #18
    Accomplished Advocate BB62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    3,887
    Quote Originally Posted by solus View Post
    sorry thought sonic (and a gaggle of other national chains got excited by the LGOC folk during the let's be 'in your face' mode of the FAILED OCT campaign.
    I used to think as you do, but time, research and lots of reading have changed my mind.

    I think what you perceive as an "in your face" campaign was 1) the only open carry method that Texans could use (barring carrying black powder pistols or somesuch), and 2) the result of anti-gun media amplifying the lies and misdirection of the Lying Mommies.

    Most people don't realize that there are/were two open carrying Texas groups (which I know only the basics of) - Open Carry Texas and Open Carry Tarrant County.

    OCT "failed" IMHO because many pro-gun people/groups in Texas and otherwise 1) bought into the lies spread about OCT and their doings, and 2) because they don't really believe in open carry, and look at OC as messing with their CC "rights". As far as I'm concerned, the owner/moderators of the previously mentioned TexasCHLforum, as well as a number of members there, fall into the above described categories.
    Last edited by BB62; 01-22-2016 at 09:44 AM. Reason: to correct group name

  19. #19
    Accomplished Advocate BB62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    3,887
    Quote Originally Posted by solus View Post
    sorry, this has been hashed, rehashed numerous times on this forum. you stealth, even in face of direct cites from 1) multiple national news agencies & numerous responses from national corp organizations stating either a new or refined modifying their firearm policy. 2) Texas firearms entities publicly stating their LGOC campaign was a mistake and caused national repercussions yet fail to acknowledge that ~ for whatever reason.

    your deflection based on your standard mantra of 'they don't know what they are talking about' is amazing.

    but i noticed you didn't provide any cite disputing my statement.

    ipse

    added: i realized i failed to provide cites myself:

    motherjones ~ http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...backlash-texas
    quote: THE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS have been rough for proponents of open-carry gun laws. No fewer than seven restaurant chains have taken a stand against firearms being brought to their businesses, after activists in Texas conducted provocative demonstrations in which they toted semi-automatic rifles into various eateries. unquote.

    motherjones ~ http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...s-sonic-videos
    quote: No fewer than five national food and beverage chains have now told them to get rid of their guns or get lost, including Starbucks, Wendy’s, Applebees, Jack in the Box, and Chipotle. unquote

    if you wish, i can review the other cites i have and provide them as necessary.
    Again, the Lying Mommies and the anti-gun media merrily got together to paint a misleading picture (surprise, surprise!) and various companies made requests of their customers in order to mollify both sides. Of course the Lying Mommies claimed, and continue to claim, victory.

    From the first article: "Update June 3, 2014, 7:15pm EDT: The NRA is now beating a retreat from its condemnation of the Texas activists. Timothy Johnson of Media Matters for America reports that the NRA's top lobbyist Chris Cox appeared on a NRA radio show on Tuesday to apologize for and repudiate the NRA's lengthy post criticizing the open carry movement: "Cox said that the statement was 'a mistake' and that 'it shouldn't have happened,' adding 'our job is not to criticize the lawful behavior of fellow gun owners.' Cox also blamed the statement on a 'staffer' who Cox said 'expressed his personal opinion.'"

  20. #20
    Regular Member stealthyeliminator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,318
    Quote Originally Posted by BB62 View Post
    OCT "failed" IMHO because many pro-gun people/groups in Texas and otherwise 1) bought into the lies spread about OCT and their doings, and 2) because they don't really believe in open carry, and look at OC as messing with their CC "rights". As far as I'm concerned, the owner/moderators of the previously mentioned TexasCHLforum, as well as a number of members there, fall into the above described categories.
    OCT's mission is not to "convert" the pre-existing CC cult or the MDA into being reasonable, fact-acute people. OCT isn't a group of psychiatrists and counselors.
    Advocate freedom please

  21. #21
    Regular Member solus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    here nc
    Posts
    6,880
    BB62, et al., seems OC tarrant county website was just a 'oh me too' for the heat of the moment site.

    ipse
    I'm only human; I do what I can; I'm just a man; I do what I can; Don't put the blame on me; Don't put your blame on me ~ Rag'n'Bone Man.

    Please do not get confused between my personality & my attitude. My personality is who I am ~ my attitude depends on who you are and how you act.

    Remember always, do not judge someone because they sin differently than you do!

    Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain

  22. #22
    Regular Member OC for ME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    White Oak Plantation
    Posts
    12,273
    One of the last places I would cite for liberty centric reporting by a media outlet is Mother Jones.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother...%28magazine%29

    Their radio outfit could be found on Air America. Mother Jones is the Huffing and Puffington Post...just spelled different.
    "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson.

    "Better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer" - English jurist William Blackstone.
    It is AFAIK original to me. Compromise is failure on the installment plan, particularly when dealing with so intractable an opponent as ignorance. - Nightmare

  23. #23
    Regular Member solus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    here nc
    Posts
    6,880
    Quote Originally Posted by OC for ME View Post
    One of the last places I would cite for liberty centric reporting by a media outlet is Mother Jones.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother...%28magazine%29

    Their radio outfit could be found on Air America. Mother Jones is the Huffing and Puffington Post...just spelled different.
    eh, kinda like wiki's early reputation i am sure, but their site had the information i was seeking consolidated in one succinct location rather root by individual establishment like a truffle on al's invention...

    ipse
    Last edited by solus; 01-22-2016 at 10:40 AM.
    I'm only human; I do what I can; I'm just a man; I do what I can; Don't put the blame on me; Don't put your blame on me ~ Rag'n'Bone Man.

    Please do not get confused between my personality & my attitude. My personality is who I am ~ my attitude depends on who you are and how you act.

    Remember always, do not judge someone because they sin differently than you do!

    Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain

  24. #24
    Regular Member OC for ME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    White Oak Plantation
    Posts
    12,273
    Police across Texas are bracing for a spike in 911 calls when the state’s open carry law takes effect Jan. 1 and panicked citizens start seeing handguns on people’s hips.

    http://www.dallasnews.com/news/metro...ross-texas.ece
    Too funny and sad in some respects.

    Texas Open Carry Going Off Without a Bang - http://www.officer.com/news/12160730...without-a-bang
    Oops...much ado about nothing, reading the previous how can this be?

    I agree with the OP, this is not the time rest on "our laurels" it now time to press the ball forward across the goal line while the press reports are fresh and new. Waiting will permit the anti-liberty crowd to tally up the few and far between negative incidents and portray them as a direct result of the new OC law. Cops will not hesitate to ignore their own facts and support the anti-liberty crowd.

    Liberty centric Texans hold the high ground and the initiative, take advantage of this while you can.
    "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson.

    "Better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer" - English jurist William Blackstone.
    It is AFAIK original to me. Compromise is failure on the installment plan, particularly when dealing with so intractable an opponent as ignorance. - Nightmare

  25. #25
    Regular Member OC for ME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    White Oak Plantation
    Posts
    12,273
    Quote Originally Posted by OC for ME View Post
    Too funny and sad in some respects.

    Oops...much ado about nothing, reading the previous how can this be?

    I agree with the OP, this is not the time rest on "our laurels" it now time to press the ball forward across the goal line while the press reports are fresh and new. Waiting will permit the anti-liberty crowd to tally up the few and far between negative incidents and portray them as a direct result of the new OC law. Cops will not hesitate to ignore their own facts and support the anti-liberty crowd.

    Liberty centric Texans hold the high ground and the initiative, take advantage of this while you can.
    http://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-wo...e55402990.html
    "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson.

    "Better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer" - English jurist William Blackstone.
    It is AFAIK original to me. Compromise is failure on the installment plan, particularly when dealing with so intractable an opponent as ignorance. - Nightmare

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •