Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: En Banc petition in Kolbe

  1. #1
    Activist Member swinokur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Montgomery County, MD
    Posts
    984

    En Banc petition in Kolbe

    filed last night.

  2. #2
    Activist Member swinokur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Montgomery County, MD
    Posts
    984
    Opposition brief on En Banc petition.

  3. #3
    Activist Member swinokur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Montgomery County, MD
    Posts
    984
    En Banc granted. wow.

    can you say Woolard?

  4. #4
    Regular Member solus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    here nc
    Posts
    6,865
    hummm bloke held an entire conversation with themselves...wow!!

    ipse
    I'm only human; I do what I can; I'm just a man; I do what I can; Don't put the blame on me; Don't put your blame on me ~ Rag'n'Bone Man.

    Please do not get confused between my personality & my attitude. My personality is who I am ~ my attitude depends on who you are and how you act.

    Remember always, do not judge someone because they sin differently than you do!

    Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Eastern Panhandle,WV ,
    Posts
    408
    Quote Originally Posted by swinokur View Post
    En Banc granted. wow.

    can you say Woolard?
    Or Nordyke, Tyler, Peruta, Skoien

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Quote Originally Posted by press1280 View Post
    Or Nordyke, Tyler, Peruta, Skoien
    Seeking relief from a tyrant from that very same tyrant usually does not work out well.


    No one has learned the lessons from their school yard bullies ?


    "Mommy, a big bully beat me up, what should I do?" Kid

    "Just ask him not to do that anymore dear" Mommy

    Bad Mommy !

  7. #7
    Activist Member swinokur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Montgomery County, MD
    Posts
    984
    supplemental briefs and state's response.

  8. #8
    Activist Member swinokur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Montgomery County, MD
    Posts
    984
    NRA Supplemental amicus brief.

    good read

  9. #9
    Activist Member swinokur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Montgomery County, MD
    Posts
    984
    Amicus brief from CRPA Foundation and others.

    well done.

  10. #10
    Activist Member swinokur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Montgomery County, MD
    Posts
    984
    Orals going on in Richmond right now.

  11. #11
    Activist Member swinokur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Montgomery County, MD
    Posts
    984
    Last edited by swinokur; 05-11-2016 at 11:58 AM.

  12. #12
    Regular Member California Right To Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    463

    Code of Conduct for United States Judges

    From the Code of Conduct for United States Judges

    Canon 3: A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office Fairly, Impartially and Diligently

    Canon 3(A)(3) states:

    "A judge should be patient, dignified, respectful, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom the judge deals in an official capacity. A judge should require similar conduct of those subject to the judge’s control, including lawyers to the extent consistent with their role in the adversary process."

    There were judges on that panel who went berserk. They violated the Federal Code of Conduct for United States Judges as did the Chief Judge for not reining them in.
    Concealed carry is of no use to me, I don't carry a purse.

    Charles Nichols – President of California Right To Carry
    http://CaliforniaRightToCarry.org

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    The common use today aspect is retarded ... totally retarded. And in Heller it was not in common use AND dangerous.

    And the term "dangerous" who knows what that means -- I guaranty you judges will us their own political leanings to decide that one.


    Sweeny did not do a great job ... agreeing that handguns would have been not covered under our RKBA if it would have been part of the NFA.

    According to Sweeny , they could ban new weapons - like the justice said - and Sweeny did not answer this very well.

    And the burden on proving that a gun is common or non-dangerous is upon citizens.

    Look at these idiots talking about Newtown etc ... I would have said "I think the country would rather have a few random and irrational shootings than a concerted efforts of the gov't to take away our freedoms".
    Last edited by davidmcbeth; 05-14-2016 at 01:00 PM.

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Eastern Panhandle,WV ,
    Posts
    408
    Quote Originally Posted by davidmcbeth View Post
    The common use today aspect is retarded ... totally retarded. And in Heller it was not in common use AND dangerous.

    And the term "dangerous" who knows what that means -- I guaranty you judges will us their own political leanings to decide that one.


    Sweeny did not do a great job ... agreeing that handguns would have been not covered under our RKBA if it would have been part of the NFA.

    According to Sweeny , they could ban new weapons - like the justice said - and Sweeny did not answer this very well.

    And the burden on proving that a gun is common or non-dangerous is upon citizens.

    Look at these idiots talking about Newtown etc ... I would have said "I think the country would rather have a few random and irrational shootings than a concerted efforts of the gov't to take away our freedoms".
    I thought Sweeny actually did well considering he was under constant attack by a hostile court. There were a few that definitely are on the other side and flipped the antis argument on it's head by pointing out that by their logic it would naturally follow that a handgun ban would be OK.
    Wilkinson's diatribes wasted a lot of time. While his Federalism arguments have some merit, clearly SCOTUS didn't think so or else they would have allowed the Chicago ban to stand. And this isn't a regulation, it's a total ban.

  15. #15
    Accomplished Advocate color of law's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    3,726

    Federal Appeals court upholds Maryland assault rifle ban


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •