• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

would u find this guy guilty knowing it would be a 30+yr sentence - Poll it !

Would you find him guilty ?


  • Total voters
    12

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
The federal government defines an alcohol-related fatal traffic accident as an accident where someone died and a person involved in the accident had some measurable amount of alcohol in his or her system. For example, a sober driver hits a pedestrian who has been drinking, even modestly. That’s considered an alcohol-related accident. A sober driver rear-ends a driver that has had something to drink. That’s considered an alcohol-related accident. A man has a drink before committing suicide in his vehicle. That’s an alcohol-related accident. A driver has a single drink and is involved in a fatal accident that he did not cause. That’s considered an alcohol-related accident. Do these sound like “drunk-driver-caused” accidents to you? That’s what the government and the anti-drinking organizations would like you to believe.

https://www.motorists.org/issues/dui/myths/

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=the+truth+behind+BAC?
Anyway, I still recommend 31 lashes before the mast. Keel hauling is a wee bit too harsh a punishment in my view.
 
Top