Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Pro se challenge loses OC handgun & long gun challenge

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Eastern Panhandle,WV ,

    Pro se challenge loses OC handgun & long gun challenge,49

    While I like the challenging of the law, seems like it needs to be done by professionals. This pro se happened to draw the same judge as the Shepherd and recently Culp cases, so this isn't a surprise.

  2. #2
    Regular Member rightwinglibertarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Seattle WA
    "The Court finds that the AUUW statute is constitutional; therefore, Plaintiff's claim is dismissed."

    Another corrupt making rulings that have no basis in reality or the Constitution. Shall not be infringed means just that, whether the tyrants or their minion gang members want to accept it.

    Now i'm going to sit back and watch as people furiously scrabble to try to justify the idea any kind of gun control is in any way legal. Lets have a poll. See who is a patriot and who isnt. I await the results

    Sent from my HTC Desire 626s using Tapatalk
    "Which part of shall not be infringed is so difficult to understand"?

    "Any and all restrictions on the bearing of arms in public places are nullified as per the Second Amendment"

    Conservative Broadcast || Google Plus profile

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts