Is this going to be a tin foil hat thread?
Hardly a tinfoil hat conspiracy:
"However, a bipartisan group of lawmakers — led by Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-New York, and Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas,— are pushing legislation that would make clear that foreign nation's shouldn't receive immunity if implicated in terrorist attacks against the U.S. This could clear the way for the families of the victims of the September 11th attacks to press forward with lawsuits against the Saudis."
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ahead-saudi-trip-obama-wedged-debate-over-9-11-report-n557871
Not 13 year old recollections. Classification of the pages came one or two years after the report by joint Congressional investigation.:
"Whether the 9/11 hijackers acted alone, or whether they had support within the U.S., remains an unanswered question -- one that began to be asked as soon as it became known that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi citizens. It was underlined when Congress’s bipartisan inquiry released its public report in July 2003. The final 28 pages, regarding possible foreign support for the terrorists, were censored in their entirety -- on President George W. Bush’s instructions."
http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_...i-on-post-911-probe-of-saudis-ex-senator-says
"Last year, convicted Al Qaeda member Zacarias Moussaoui implicated high-level Saudi royals in the 9/11 attacks. fueling the ongoing congressional effort to declassify the official report."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-to-declassify-911-docs-ahead-saudi-trip.html
Though there are limitations/restrictions even in the Social Lounge, we'll leave it for now. It is entertaining (for a while) to watch the ill-informed and/or protagonist(?) cover themselves in bovine excrement.FUQ?
Let this thread expire...and quickly at that!
Though there are limitations/restrictions even in the Social Lounge, we'll leave it for now. It is entertaining (for a while) to watch the ill-informed and/or protagonist(?) cover themselves in bovine excrement.
I know on which side of the fence each stands.Antagonist
I know on which side of the fence each stands.
My point of using the question mark was intended to cause others to ask themselves the question and to illuminate for them that even well-intended people will get dirty when the wrestle in the mud with a pig.
Further, to complete the cliché - .....and the pig enjoys it.
I see what you did there.Well I certainly don't want to tease any pigs.
"Families of 9/11 victims demand release of sealed documents"
http://video.foxnews.com/v/48522038...d-release-of-sealed-documents/?#sp=show-clips
"Sperry emphasized the importance of both releasing the 28 Pages and passing legislation that would allow 9/11 families to use the declassified information, by filing suit against the Saudis involved in the attacks. "
http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016...can-end-suicidal-phony-alliance-saudi-arabia/
I'm not sure which side the folks that are whining about this issue are on.