Rusty Young Man
Regular Member
Antis at it again with their frivolous lawsuits and double-speak.
If they can't get money going after the locked-up Colorado mass-murderer* and his family (they aren't rich, so why place the blame where it is due? ), then maybe they can go after the innocent manufacturers of inanimate objects (because "scary!").
Since they may not get money out of that case, maybe they can go after the theater that adhered to the antis' advice of having a "Gun-Free" zone and no armed guards (because having armed guards is just a paranoid, "ammosexual" idea, right?).
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/08/colorado-theaters-security-at-issue-in-civil-trial.html
Let's see:
1) So do good guys with guns stop bad guys with guns, or not?
2) I thought calling out for armed guards, security cameras, alarms, etc. was a sign of paranoia?
3) Why didn't the magical "No Weapons" signs work?
4) Since Warren v District of Columbia established that public officials (such as LEOs) have no obligation to protect the individual citizen, why would UNARMED employees have that obligation?
5) Where can I buy "head-to-toe body armor"?
*Not "shooter", since that is anyone who fires any firearm. The correct term is "mass-murderer", "rapid-pace mass-murderer", etc.
If they can't get money going after the locked-up Colorado mass-murderer* and his family (they aren't rich, so why place the blame where it is due? ), then maybe they can go after the innocent manufacturers of inanimate objects (because "scary!").
Since they may not get money out of that case, maybe they can go after the theater that adhered to the antis' advice of having a "Gun-Free" zone and no armed guards (because having armed guards is just a paranoid, "ammosexual" idea, right?).
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/08/colorado-theaters-security-at-issue-in-civil-trial.html
The bolding and underlining are my emphasis.Fox article said:DENVER – Nine months after the Colorado theater shooter was sentenced to life in prison, some victims are returning to the same courtroom in hopes of holding the suburban Denver movie theater accountable for not doing more to prevent his bloody rampage.
They say Century Theaters should have had armed guards at the packed opening of the Batman film "The Dark Knight Rises" and alarms that would have sounded when James Holmes slipped into the darkened auditorium through an emergency exit and opened fire, killing 12.
In a civil trial starting Monday in state court, 28 victims' families will argue Cinemark, which owns the theater where the shooting happened, knew the midnight blockbuster would attract at least 1,000 people and should have had guards patrolling the parking lot, where they might have seen Holmes suiting up in head-to-toe body armor in his car. The lawsuit says theater employees failed to check doors, lacked closed-circuit television cameras that would have allowed them to spot trouble and did not intervene as victims lay wounded and dying in the aisles.SNIP...
Let's see:
1) So do good guys with guns stop bad guys with guns, or not?
2) I thought calling out for armed guards, security cameras, alarms, etc. was a sign of paranoia?
3) Why didn't the magical "No Weapons" signs work?
4) Since Warren v District of Columbia established that public officials (such as LEOs) have no obligation to protect the individual citizen, why would UNARMED employees have that obligation?
5) Where can I buy "head-to-toe body armor"?
*Not "shooter", since that is anyone who fires any firearm. The correct term is "mass-murderer", "rapid-pace mass-murderer", etc.
Last edited: