Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Intruder shot by NSW homeowner

  1. #1
    Regular Member DW98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    267

    Intruder shot by NSW homeowner

    Nice work by the homeowner. Hope he comes out of it OK.

    An intruder was shot in the leg during an alleged violent break and enter near Lake Macquarie in NSW after he struggled with the owner.

    The 58-year-old owner of the Teralba property was alerted to his shed allegedly being broken into by his dogs barking and confronted three men in the early hours of Saturday morning, NSW police say.

    A firearm was discharged during an ensuing scuffle and a 30-year-old man was found after fleeing the scene with a gunshot wound to his leg.
    https://au.news.yahoo.com/nsw/a/3159...eak-and-enter/

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Good for the owner protecting his shedded property. I store all my Olivia Newton John memorabilia in my shed ... he would have gotten much more than just a shot in the leg but would have been also given a stern lecture.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Thru Death's Door in Wisconsin
    Posts
    13,151
    Was this a proper use of deadly force, separately considering legality and morality, protecting property? Arguably the homeowner was not innocent of instigation, was not in fear of bodily harm, and so on.
    I am responsible for my writing, not your understanding of it.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Quote Originally Posted by Nightmare View Post
    Was this a proper use of deadly force, separately considering legality and morality, protecting property? Arguably the homeowner was not innocent of instigation, was not in fear of bodily harm, and so on.
    When a person is on your property doing evil ... do you have to wait for him/her to pull out her ankle-holstered gun that one cannot see?

    That's the problem with many state laws today -- they assume that the interloper means not to kill you. I would think the opposite, that a person on my land w/o my permission or invitation is looking to harm me, not just steal things.

    I support legislation that would allow an owner to shoot anyone on his land w/o having legal permission to be there.

    I think once such laws are passed, people are aware of them and the ones not wishing to harm you will stay off your land. Makes sense to me.

    And the requirement of "fear" ? Fear is a state of mind .. not everyone who encounters a life-threatening event will feel fear...even when many others would. What scares me might not scare you over the same life-threatening event.
    Last edited by davidmcbeth; 05-15-2016 at 01:15 PM.

  5. #5
    Regular Member DW98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    267
    If the intruder had been shot trying to break into the house, then the owner would have been fine. The shed makes it a bit more complicated, because as mentioned, he wasn't in direct threat of being physically harmed. Basically, the self-defence legislation in NSW covers property theft and/or destruction, as long as the action taken is determined to be 'reasonable'. As it turns out in this case, the burglar was the one with the gun. There was a struggle and he was shot with his own gun. I really doubt any charges will be laid against the homeowner, thankfully.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    That was a twist ! Reminds me of a song..

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2hawbp5XT4

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •