Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Federal Appeals Court: Second Amendment Doesn’t Guarantee Right to Concealed Carry

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Ellsworth Wisconsin

    Federal Appeals Court: Second Amendment Doesn’t Guarantee Right to Concealed Carry

    California has a rich tradition in restricting carrying handguns.

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — In a victory for gun control advocates, a federal appeals court said Thursday people do not have a right to carry concealed weapons in public under the 2nd Amendment.

    An 11-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said law enforcement officials can require applicants for a concealed weapons permit to show they are in immediate danger or have another good reason for a permit beyond self-defense.

    California generally prohibits people from carrying handguns in public without such a permit.

    Wow. The article goes on to state that more people carrying guns endangers police lives. But one qualification to obtain a permit is to have a good moral character. This is an oxymoron. This state wants to rescind their 2A and their leaders in DC want to rescind 2A from all states!
    Last edited by Grapeshot; 06-09-2016 at 05:04 PM. Reason: fixed title

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Thru Death's Door in Wisconsin

    Posted Noon in News & Political Alerts. Search is your friend.

    If TRUMP 2016 loses then I will shrug off my WHITE MAN'S BURDEN and leave the world to the Dindus and Done Nuffins. Read and understand Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged as a prescription for the future. TRUMP 2016

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Northwest Kent County, Michigan
    And not this:

    An attorney for the plaintiffs said Thursday that he is considering an appeal to the Supreme Court, but indicated that future challenges might need to focus on the right to carry a firearm in the open rather than in a concealed manner.
    “The Peruta decision specifically avoided answering the critical legal question of whether, if concealed carry is prohibited, some form of open carry of firearms must be allowed,” said attorney Chuck Michel. “California law bans open carry, so the constitutionality of that ban will now have to be tested.”

    Charles Nichols will be pleased to note that what should have been obvious previously, has finally been accepted as fact.

  4. #4
    Accomplished Advocate
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    It's the ninth circuit court of appeals, what do you expect.....

  5. #5
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    N. Chesterfield, Va.
    There is nothing wrong with this thread.

    It is being left as a link to an earlier thread on the same subject in the News and Political Alerts sub-forum.

    Posts from this thread have been copied and entered there.
    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training.” Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts