• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

4A is Officially Extinct

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
Or be proactive...file no contact orders with LEO depts. notifying them that you do not consent to any contact from LEOs of the agency.

Then when they contact you they are assaulting you (unless they have RAS or PC or warrant).

I have filed them and they howl when they read them....but none have violated them. They know what would happen. Not good things for them.
Please cite the form, or forms, required in CT that would notify cops that they are restrained from contacting you.

If no cite to the proper form(s) you are spreading fertilizer...again. Also, ya got any video/audio of cops howling after you "served" them notice?
 

Ezek

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2015
Messages
411
Location
missouri
I don't know about that. I've seen references to maybe two states which require a cop to state his basis for a detention to the detainee if the detainee asks for it. Otherwise, after years of paying attention to this point, I know of nothing that requires a cop to answer.

Spearately, why wait for the cop to give an answer that suggests an illegal detention before requesting a lawyer? For illustrative purposes, I would ask, are you not going to request a lawyer if the cop gives you a genuine reasonable basis to detain you?

good point, and solidly made.

again I gues I was overcomplicating it.

you are right most don't "have" to answer you, but most will. some won't. either way you announce you don't answer questions without legal counsel. and if you can get why you where detained out of the cop and the video shows that to be complete and utter BS.. well.. you have a rights violation, and/or harassment. this question also does NOT implicate you in anyway or provide any use against you in a courtroom IMO, since the officers report will of course already mention why.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
Please cite the form, or forms, required in CT that would notify cops that they are restrained from contacting you.

If no cite to the proper form(s) you are spreading fertilizer...again. Also, ya got any video/audio of cops howling after you "served" them notice?

"proper form"? You must work in a gov't office where bureaucracy rules your day with forms and form numbers. Cite a statue that says a form is required? Because you create the document and you have it served upon the department in accordance with the service requirements of papers.

And maybe I do have audio/video ...share with you if I do? PASS

You keep on telling folks that I spread fertilizer but I keep winning in court ! See attached jpg .. state admits being naughty ... I have other claims pending too which will also likely be admitted to....
 

Attachments

  • Capture free speech claim acknowldged.jpg
    Capture free speech claim acknowldged.jpg
    109.1 KB · Views: 66

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
"proper form"? You must work in a gov't office where bureaucracy rules your day with forms and form numbers. Cite a statue that says a form is required? Because you create the document and you have it served upon the department in accordance with the service requirements of papers.

And maybe I do have audio/video ...share with you if I do? PASS

You keep on telling folks that I spread fertilizer but I keep winning in court ! See attached jpg .. state admits being naughty ... I have other claims pending too which will also likely be admitted to....
There is a form that is to be used in CT to inform a citizen, even a government employee citizen, that they are restrained from contacting you. Produce a copy of the form you served the cops. No form you are spreading fertilizer.

I suspect that you have not one video of cops howling...as you have asserted.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
There is a form that is to be used in CT to inform a citizen, even a government employee citizen, that they are restrained from contacting you. Produce a copy of the form you served the cops. No form you are spreading fertilizer.

I suspect that you have not one video of cops howling...as you have asserted.

You are talking about a restraining order. Not talking about a restraining order. TRO/ROs are filed after an issue has been encountered; mine address contact before issues are encountered. No form for that, just like a notice of trespass has no form.

Do you think you need to be contacted before you tell a gov't official "I do not consent to any consensual encounter?" No, one does not have to wait for that. Be proactive.
 

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
You are talking about a restraining order. Not talking about a restraining order. TRO/ROs are filed after an issue has been encountered; mine address contact before issues are encountered. No form for that, just like a notice of trespass has no form.

Do you think you need to be contacted before you tell a gov't official "I do not consent to any consensual encounter?" No, one does not have to wait for that. Be proactive.
Produce the order. Not a complicated request.

Your order, if it exists, is a proactive act to preserve your 4A. In light of the op it seems that a cop could simply state that he misunderstood (Heien), or that he broke the law by initiating contact but the violation is inconsequential and thus he would not be held accountable for breaking the law just a teeny tiny bit.
 

Ezek

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2015
Messages
411
Location
missouri
my opinion, OC4ME is right, all the officer needs is RAS to break the no contact order.

and RAS can be made out of thin air these days it seems.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
Produce the order. Not a complicated request.

Your order, if it exists, is a proactive act to preserve your 4A. In light of the op it seems that a cop could simply state that he misunderstood (Heien), or that he broke the law by initiating contact but the violation is inconsequential and thus he would not be held accountable for breaking the law just a teeny tiny bit.

You will not see the order.

However, it would not be only a 4th amendment issue but it would be an assault upon you. The same as violating a notice of trespass, its trespassing once the prohibited person enters.

If the guy has RAS or not? Something for the courts to decide. Check you state citizens arrest rules of course. Where I'm at its very much pro-citizen arrest.
 

Michigander

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
4,818
Location
Mulligan's Valley
Most of us here who have been around long enough to have done the grunt work of setting OC into motion in our various regions have seen many examples of the bill of rights being flamboyantly violated where fruit of the poisonous tree should have more than applied and no one cares because the charges are also bogus, and no amount of bringing this up to the prosecutor or anything else will stop a lengthy and expensive trial.

When the rubber meets the road, I'm not so sure this really matters, at least for a meticulously law abiding activist. It should, but I think the idea that it does gives far too much credibility to a corrupt system.
 

Va_Nemo

Member
Joined
May 1, 2016
Messages
654
Location
Lynchburg
When I rather recently started perusing this place Mr. Mcbeth sure did seem to be much more than a fair bit of a jerk in general, idiot in specific on many many things. One of those dayum little pests that hang around and bother the living daylights out of you and never goes away. No matter how many times you get away from it, it just hangs on. From deck to kitchen to living room to pool to shower to front porch and its still there.

But over the recent past I gotta say, on occasion he sure seems to occasionally have his ducks in a row on a fair number of things. Maybe a major jerk with well rowed up ducks but he does get some fair credit.

On this, he gets credit without uploading a PDF. From me anyway.

Nemo
 

utbagpiper

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,061
Location
Utah
You will not see the order.

On this, he gets credit without uploading a PDF. From me anyway.

For the life of me, I can't imagine why he wouldn't upload a pdf of whatever form he is using. With his information redacted what does he have to lose?

Not only would he gain credibility, he would also provide a service to others here who might actually wish to emulate him. He has a found or produced a form that works well for him. Why not share it with others....if it exists?

Charles
 
Last edited:

Jeff Hayes

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
2,569
Location
Long gone
The 4A is not extinct, in fact it has never changed, the government can not take rights away, the real problem is all of us that stand by and allow crap like this ruling to stand.
 

Dario

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2013
Messages
204
Location
Larimer County, CO
I see a silver lining here. Less blood-sucking lawyers getting charges dropped for guilty and/or stupid people who never bothered learning their rights. Never consent, always ask to see a warrant, do not incriminate yourself etc. has been shouted from the rooftops ever since Al Gore invented the internet. The COTUS, UN charter, USCC, federal, state and local statues are all available to anyone with the click of a mouse. There is no excuse for being ignorant of the law in this day and age.
 

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
I see a silver lining here. Less blood-sucking lawyers getting charges dropped for guilty and/or stupid people who never bothered learning their rights. Never consent, always ask to see a warrant, do not incriminate yourself etc. has been shouted from the rooftops ever since Al Gore invented the internet. The COTUS, UN charter, USCC, federal, state and local statues are all available to anyone with the click of a mouse. There is no excuse for being ignorant of the law in this day and age.
Terry, Heien, and Strieff stand in disagreement with your assertion. Remember, cops are excused as a matter of law.
 
Top