Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Hillary Clinton ‘loves’ the idea of appointing Obama to Supreme Court.

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Thru Death's Door in Wisconsin
    Posts
    13,147

    Hillary Clinton ‘loves’ the idea of appointing Obama to Supreme Court.

    Wednesday, January 27, 2016

    At a campaign event in Iowa Tuesday, Mrs. Clinton told the crowd the next president may have to appoint up to three Supreme Court justices. When one attendee mentioned Mr. Obama as a contender, she seemed excited by the recommendation.
    “Wow, what a great idea. No one has ever suggested that to me, I love that, wow,” Mrs. Clinton said. “He may have a few other things to do, but I tell you, that’s a great idea.
    “I mean, he’s brilliant, he can set forth an argument and he was a law professor,” she added. “So he’s got all the credentials, but we would have to get a Democratic Senate to get him confirmed.”

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...supreme-court/

    Let's see how #nevertrump responds to that gobbet of red-meat!
    Last edited by Nightmare; 06-26-2016 at 05:25 PM.
    I am responsible for my writing, not your understanding of it.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Northern Piedmont-Culpeper
    Posts
    176
    This is a brilliant political move on her part: "Elect me and elect a Democratic Senate and I will insure the man you all love so much will be moved to a position to best help our Cause." Although I think the attendee who mentioned it was a plant and she obviously lied about no one ever suggesting it to her.
    "Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson

  3. #3
    Campaign Veteran deepdiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Southeast, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    5,974
    Quote Originally Posted by JTHunter View Post
    Of course it is a "smart move" on her part. The problem I have is the inherent bias a previous president would have on making a ruling on legislation he had signed.
    You misspelled "inherent bias a would-be tyrant who has flaunted and destroyed the rule of law at every turn would have"
    Bob Owens @ Bearing Arms (paraphrased): "These people aren't against violence; they're very much in favor of violence. They're against armed resistance."

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Well he does have the credentials .. which are nothing. A newborn can be on SCOTUS...as long as its not objected to and wins confirmation.

    Lots of idiots have been on SCOTUS....

    Lets face it, our legal system needs improvement. Judge Dredd is a better system.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •