Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Anyone else sees an issue with facts not admissible being able to support PC?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    16,172

    Anyone else sees an issue with facts not admissible being able to support PC?

    http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news...in-8382474.php

    The $2 roadside tests, which officers use to help establish probable cause for an arrest, cannot be used at trial as evidence under Texas law.

    How can a test that not admissible be used to establish PC? That's crazy.

    Currently, I am examining my state lab's criminal lab testing methods and validation studies and have found issues with every one I have completed an examination of....big enough issues to make the test results unreliable IMO.

  2. #2
    Regular Member 1245A Defender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    north mason county, Washington, USA
    Posts
    4,349

    Well,,,

    you have to subscribe before you can read that story. no thank you.
    EMNofSeattle wrote: Your idea of freedom terrifies me. So you are actually right. I am perfectly happy with what you call tyranny.....

    “If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.”

    Stand up for your Rights,, They have no authority on their own...

    All power is inherent in the people,
    it is their right and duty to be at all times ARMED!

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    16,172
    Quote Originally Posted by 1245A Defender View Post
    you have to subscribe before you can read that story. no thank you.
    Always concerned with this issue ... I can read w/o doing so. Why? I don't know. Try again?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •