So do you think he helps or hurts Trump?Mike Pence is the answer to Hilary, not Trump.
My .02
Regards
So do you think he helps or hurts Trump?Mike Pence is the answer to Hilary, not Trump.
My .02
Regards
So do you think he helps or hurts Trump?
NO, your vacuity towards the topic is laughable along with your trifling reply.I think if everyone stopped replying CCJ would continue posting his rants for days to come. Seems like he has a great deal to say. At what point does a thread become a blog?
Hillary the lesser of two evils? Laughable!
NO, your vacuity towards the topic is laughable along with your trifling reply.
Having Trump removed from the race may in fact be the only strategy to defeat Clinton.
You're*United States voters to Mr.Trump.. YOUR FIRED!
"We reap what we Sow"
Having Trump removed may lead to the defeat of Clinton based on what? Your political expertise? Really? Tell me more. Please do continue to demonstrate your "superior intelligence" on the subject through your nonsensical ranting. It truly is quite entertaining.
Trump is a clown for sure but certainly not the greater of two evils.
You're*
Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
It isn't defensible. Voting for Trump or Hillary will be a shameful decision.
+1
In fact, setting myself above my fellow human beings and voting for anybody would be a shameful decision.
Called decisions are as valid as the printed Forum Rules. These are decidedly not a list of personal complaints (jeremiad).Mr.trump's dueling weapon is his tongue.
I am not going to defend the vile actions of Mrs. Clinton. My query was how do we or anyone else "defend the undefendable"
Now if I violated any forum rules with my discussing, emphasizing or in your opinion ranting, than I humbly apologize to the members however if there is no violation I shall continue to make my comparison between Trump and Burr and your jeremiad post shall be well noted.
Now Sir, would you care to try an attempt at defending Mr.trump/ Mr.Burr invidious comments, hitherto you have only espoused your axiom concerning my statements.. I await your defense Sir.
Regards
Called decisions are as valid as the printed Forum Rules. These are decidedly not a list of personal complaints (jeremiad).
I do not engage in public "debate" with members of this forum. I do not think such would be appropriate. I may give my opinion and when necesitated (rules violation) make a decision. That, sir, is the end of that discussion.
I acknowledge that I am the author of post #9.No offense--no really: no offense. But, CCJ is not the person who said in post #9 above:
"Trump aka Aaron Burr? Really? I don't see where he shot anyone." (Emphasis by Citizen).
--snipped--
Nor is it Trump!!!!Picky, picky, picky.........
I'm not voting for a saint. I voting for someone who is actually going to restore our Constitution. And that ain't Hillary.
...
I will defend TRUMP's right to speak freely and offensively just as I will defend Obama's right to speak offensively, and Hillary's and BJ Clinton and all of his bimbos. ...
You can't reason with people who live in glass houses that believe that throwing stones is a righteous act.Are they using violence to silence?
Trump spoke freely. He continues to speak freely. They can't claim he doesn't really have free speech just because there are consequences to the speech he chooses. Being "free of" condemnation for your choices or words is not a part of free speech.