Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Judge dismisses Newtown families' lawsuit against Remington Arms

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Thru Death's Door in Wisconsin
    Posts
    11,267

    Judge dismisses Newtown families' lawsuit against Remington Arms

    Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis on Friday granted a motion by Madison, North Carolina-based Remington Arms to strike the lawsuit by the families of nine children and adults killed and a teacher who survived the 2012 attack. A gunman killed 20 children and six adults at the school with an AR-15-style rifle.

    Bellis cited the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act passed by Congress in 2005 that protected gun makers from such lawsuits. The families' lawyers said their lawsuit was allowed under an exception to the act, but Bellis disagreed.

    http://www.uticaod.com/news/20161014...remington-arms
    Hail TRUMP Victory. Hail TRUMP Sieg! Hail TRUMP Siegreich!

  2. #2
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    36,357
    Lady Justice may be blind, but she doesn't come cheap. Defense of that suit must have cost Remington mega bucks to defend and the fat lady may not have sung her last in this extravaganza yet.
    Last edited by Grapeshot; 10-14-2016 at 07:05 PM. Reason: added
    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training. Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Cherry Tree (Indiana County), Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    1,140
    Defense of the suit may have indeed cost Remington some money, but they can afford such up front. They'll make up the "loss" in the long run by passing on the cost to consumers, which is the way any for-profit company works.

    However, the legal bill for the plaintiffs will have to be borne by those filing the lawsuit, who do not have deep pockets. Will their attorneys just write it off as "pro bono" work? Will Moms Against Everything kick in to help pay the legal bill?

    And, since it was a frivolous lawsuit, will Remington ask for the plaintiffs to pay for Remington's defense?

    It ought to be interesting....

  4. #4
    Regular Member JTHunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    In Illinois near St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,005
    It's about time that one of these court systems started using a little LOGIC and COMMON SENSE.
    Good for Judge Bellis!

  5. #5
    Regular Member DeSchaine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    458
    Took long enough for something that never should have been let through in the first place to be tossed out.
    Guard with jealous attention the public liberty.
    Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel.
    Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force.
    Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.
    -Patrick Henry, Virginia Ratification Convention, June 5, 1788

  6. #6
    Regular Member twoskinsonemanns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    2,526
    Quote Originally Posted by Statkowski View Post
    However, the legal bill for the plaintiffs will have to be borne by those filing the lawsuit, who do not have deep pockets.
    I dunno. I would be surprised if Bloomberg cash was not involved.
    Last edited by twoskinsonemanns; 10-15-2016 at 07:06 PM.
    "I support the ban on assault weapons" - Donald Trump

    We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission - Ayn Rand

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •