• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Not carrying per sheriffs request

GnarTank

Newbie
Joined
Jul 21, 2017
Messages
2
Location
Michigan
I live on a piece of property in MI with access to a lake. I regularly OC in my yard and sometimes have to deal with people tresspassing, mostly people fishing. Everytime I go tell people to leave I carry for my own protection, and to potentially ward off others from tresspassing. Ive recently had trouble with a neighbor that feels its "his right" to be on the property. After countless times of telling him to leave he finally challenged me to call the police. Last time I saw him, I did. I made the officer aware of the fact that I carry on the property and he advised me to stop as the neightbor could say I pulled it on him even if I didn't, leaving it as a "he said she said" situation. I'm not sure what to do as its my right to carry but I also don't want to get into legal trouble because a crazy neighbor claimed I pulled a gun on him. Advice?

Sorry for any typos, I posted this from my phone
 

Fallschirjmäger

Active member
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
3,823
Location
Cumming, Georgia, USA
Ask Deputy Dawg what he would do should someone call the Sheriff and make a baseless accusation that he had 'drawn down' on a citizen. Would he face charges or be subject to an investigation?
Your defense should be the same.

The Deputy's hypothetical situation could happen to anyone, anywhere, at any time. Fortunately the law requires that the prosecution prove 'beyond a reasonable doubt' that something occurred, unlike a civil trial where it depends on the preponderance of the evidence ('he said v. she said').
 
Last edited:

color of law

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
5,950
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(zq...g.aspx?page=GetObject&objectname=mcl-750-411i
750.411i Definitions; aggravated stalking; circumstances; violation as felony; penalty; probation; additional conditions of probation; effect of continued course of conduct; rebuttable presumption; additional penalty.

(1) As used in this section:

(e) “Stalking” means a willful course of conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment of another individual that would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested and that actually causes the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested.
Could you be accused of stalking?
But, what about Unconsented contact?
(f) “Unconsented contact” means any contact with another individual that is initiated or continued without that individual's consent or in disregard of that individual's expressed desire that the contact be avoided or discontinued. Unconsented contact includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:

(i) Following or appearing within the sight of that individual.

(ii) Approaching or confronting that individual in a public place or on private property.

I hope you have NO TRESPASSING signs posted and NO FISHING signs posted.
 

color of law

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
5,950
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT (EXCERPT)
Act 451 of 1994


324.73102 Entering or remaining on property of another; consent; exceptions.

Sec. 73102.

(1) Except as provided in subsection (4), a person shall not enter or remain upon the property of another person, other than farm property or a wooded area connected to farm property, to engage in any recreational activity or trapping on that property without the consent of the owner or his or her lessee or agent, if either of the following circumstances exists:

(a) The property is fenced or enclosed and is maintained in such a manner as to exclude intruders.

(b) The property is posted in a conspicuous manner against entry. The minimum letter height on the posting signs shall be 1 inch. Each posting sign shall be not less than 50 square inches, and the signs shall be spaced to enable a person to observe not less than 1 sign at any point of entry upon the property.

(2) Except as provided in subsection (4), a person shall not enter or remain upon farm property or a wooded area connected to farm property for any recreational activity or trapping without the consent of the owner or his or her lessee or agent, whether or not the farm property or wooded area connected to farm property is fenced, enclosed, or posted.

(3) On fenced or posted property or farm property, a fisherman wading or floating a navigable public stream may, without written or oral consent, enter upon property within the clearly defined banks of the stream or, without damaging farm products, walk a route as closely proximate to the clearly defined bank as possible when necessary to avoid a natural or artificial hazard or obstruction, including, but not limited to, a dam, deep hole, or a fence or other exercise of ownership by the riparian owner.

(4) A person other than a person possessing a firearm may, unless previously prohibited in writing or orally by the property owner or his or her lessee or agent, enter on foot upon the property of another person for the sole purpose of retrieving a hunting dog. The person shall not remain on the property beyond the reasonable time necessary to retrieve the dog. In an action under section 73109 or 73110, the burden of showing that the property owner or his or her lessee or agent previously prohibited entry under this subsection is on the plaintiff or prosecuting attorney, respectively.

(5) Consent to enter or remain upon the property of another person pursuant to this section may be given orally or in writing. The consent may establish conditions for entering or remaining upon that property. Unless prohibited in the written consent, a written consent may be amended or revoked orally. If the owner or his or her lessee or agent requires all persons entering or remaining upon the property to have written consent, the presence of the person on the property without written consent is prima facie evidence of unlawful entry.
Post your property.
 

GnarTank

Newbie
Joined
Jul 21, 2017
Messages
2
Location
Michigan
Thanks everyone. I have posted no tresspassing signs but no "no fishing" signs as the entire lake is within the bounds of the property. I do take photos of the trespasser on a still camera everytime I see him but no video. I could be a stalker on my own property?
 

color of law

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
5,950
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Thanks everyone. I have posted no tresspassing signs but no "no fishing" signs as the entire lake is within the bounds of the property. I do take photos of the trespasser on a still camera every time I see him but no video. I could be a stalker on my own property?
Does the law say you can't.? No it doesn't. That is the problem with the law. It's done against husbands and wives all the time.
 
Last edited:

countryclubjoe

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
2,505
Location
nj
Thanks everyone. I have posted no tresspassing signs but no "no fishing" signs as the entire lake is within the bounds of the property. I do take photos of the trespasser on a still camera everytime I see him but no video. I could be a stalker on my own property?

The video and weapon are your best friends.. No, you cannot be charged with stalking for using the video camera, however without said video camera you could be exposing yourself to unnecessary legal issues. Be armed and be wise!

CCJ
 

color of law

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
5,950
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT)
Act 328 of 1931


750.234e Brandishing firearm in public; applicability; violation as misdemeanor; penalty.

Sec. 234e.

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), a person shall not willfully and knowingly brandish a firearm in public.

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to either of the following:

(a) A peace officer lawfully performing his or her duties as a peace officer.

(b) A person lawfully acting in self-defense or defense of another under the self-defense act, 2006 PA 309, MCL 780.971 to 780.974.

(3) A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 90 days, or a fine of not more than $100.00, or both.
I guess you can wave your gun around as long as you stay on your property.
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT)
Act 328 of 1931


750.234e Brandishing firearm in public; applicability; violation as misdemeanor; penalty.

Sec. 234e.

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), a person shall not willfully and knowingly brandish a firearm in public.

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to either of the following:

(a) A peace officer lawfully performing his or her duties as a peace officer.

(b) A person lawfully acting in self-defense or defense of another under the self-defense act, 2006 PA 309, MCL 780.971 to 780.974.

(3) A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 90 days, or a fine of not more than $100.00, or both.

I guess you can wave your gun around as long as you stay on your property.

How did you come to that conclusion?
 

color of law

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
5,950
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
How did you come to that conclusion?
750.234e Brandishing firearm in public; applicability; violation as misdemeanor; penalty.
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), a person shall not willfully and knowingly brandish a firearm in public.
You know the difference between public versus private.
 

JTHunter2

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
431
Location
Planet Earth
GnarTank - you might also consider a CHEAP digital camera that you can hang around your neck or stick in a shirt pocket.

And, just for your info, there is a practice that some "antis" have advocated called "swatting". They would call police when they see somebody legally carrying in the bizarre hope that they legal carrier would be confronted by the cops - to their detriment. This "neighbor" could try the same tactic which is why I suggested the cheap camera.
Let him explain that video!
:banana:
 
B

Bikenut

Guest
I will add my voice to those who are suggesting using a video camera to record any and all interactions with trespassers. Actually that would be a wise thing to do whether you are armed or not simply because the video not only shows what did happen but also, perhaps more importantly, shows what didn't happen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

KBCraig

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,886
Location
Granite State of Mind
750.234e Brandishing firearm in public; applicability; violation as misdemeanor; penalty.
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), a person shall not willfully and knowingly brandish a firearm in public.
You know the difference between public versus private.

And you know, or should know, that one can be "in public" on private property. Being nude on your front lawn in a city neighborhood is a good example.
 

color of law

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
5,950
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
And you know, or should know, that one can be "in public" on private property. Being nude on your front lawn in a city neighborhood is a good example.
Incorrect. You can be be viewed from public property even though you are standing on your own private property. But, the statute only addresses willfully and knowingly brandishing a firearm in the public.

Adjective: "in" (of a person) present at one's home. "we knocked at the door but there was no one in"
Synonyms: present, (at) home.
 

F350

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
941
Location
The High Plains of Wyoming
As many others have said; get a video camera.


Then tell deputy dawg to perform un-natual acts on himself.



I had property in SE Missouri (heart of the meth problem) and use to patrol my property on an ATV with either an AR, FN-FAL or M1-A in a scabbard and a G20 10mm in a thigh holster. Ran into a deputy who stopped me (property was irregularly shaped with county road on 2 sides, I was on the road) with overheads and "advised" me I shouldn't carry weapons. I told him exactly where he could put his advice and asked for his name, he drove off but I got his plate # and called the sheriff, sheriff was real nice and said he would talk to his deputy, also said anyone with acreage who isn't armed when out and about was "a damned fool".
 
Last edited:

DeSchaine

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
537
Location
Kalamazoo, MI

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
What DeSchaine said...simple trespassing is not a felony anywhere that I know of and I could be wrong. Is poaching a misdemeanor or felony in MI? Every time you see a trespasser photograph/record, call the cops. Get the cops to pile on poaching charges as well.
 
Top