Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Day two at the gun ban conference

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Fairbanks, Alaska, USA

    Post imported post
    Day two at the gun ban conference Jun 28, 2006
    by Cam Edwards ( bio | archive | contact )

    A remarkable thing happened at the United Nations yesterday. We, the United States, told the world “no”. The messenger was Robert Joseph, the Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security. Speaking before the dozens of nations that have gathered for the review conference on Small Arms and Light Weapons, Joseph told the world in no uncertain terms where the United States stood. “The U.S. Constitution guarantees the rights of our citizens to keep and bear arms, and there will be no infringement of those rights,” he proclaimed to the dignitaries and functionaries. “The United States will not agree to any provisions restricting civilian possession, use or legal trade of firearms inconsistent with our laws and practices.”

    Now, if this sounds familiar, it should be. It was five years ago that UN Ambassador John Bolton said something similar during the first conference on small arms. Then, as now, many countries wanted the conference to discuss and implement controls on the civilian possession of firearms. In fact, the draft version of the Program of Action specifically referenced civilian possession, stating the following:

    The illicit trade in small arms and light weapons can be exacerbated by the unregulated possession of small arms and light weapons by civilians not part of responsible military and police forces. The measures below can contribute to addressing this aspect of the illicit trade in these weapons.
    • (a) States will establish appropriate national legislation, administrative regulations and licensing requirements that define conditions under which small arms and light weapons can be acquired, used and traded by private persons.
    • (b) States will seriously consider the prohibition of unrestricted trade and private ownership of small arms and light weapons specifically designed for military purposes (e.g., assault rifles, machine guns, grenades and high explosives produced for military purposes).
    When John Bolton spoke at the opening of the summit in 2001, he said, “We request that Section II, paragraph 20, which refers to restrictions on the civilian possession of arms, to be eliminated from the Program of Action, and that other provisions which purport to require national regulation of the lawful possession of firearms… be modified to confine their reach to illicit international activities.” The delegates blinked, and the language was removed.

    Will the same happen in 2006? The civilian possession of firearms promises to be a contentious issue once again. On Monday and Tuesday of this week, countries like Mexico and Indonesia spoke glowingly of the need to ensnare civilian gun owners in the UN’s web of gun regulation. It will once again take steadfast resolve from the US delegation to stop the gun banners from expanding the Program of Action to try and regulate legal firearms. is committed to bringing you the most complete coverage of the UN Summit on Small Arms and Light Weapons. Executive Editor Ginny Simone is reporting live from the summit every afternoon on and on Sirius Satellite Radio (Patriot 144). Additionally, we’ll be broadcasting “Cam and Company” live from New York City for the final three days of the conference. I hope you’ll be able to tune in to our coverage. It’s a story that’s woefully underreported, but one every American needs to hear.

    Cam Edwards is the host of “Cam and Company” on and Sirius Satellite Radio. A veteran talk show host and political analyst, he blogs at in addition to his daily talk show. Cam lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and five children.
    Copyright © 2006

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Mesilla/Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA

    Post imported post

    John Bolton may be our best ally to fight any UN gun grab. He is a modern day Patrick Henry in that regard.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts