Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Day four at the UN gun ban conference

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Fairbanks, Alaska, USA
    Posts
    41

    Post imported post

    Day four at the UN gun ban conference By Cam Edwards

    http://www.townhall.com/opinion/colu...30/203225.html

    Jun 30, 2006

    It seems to be getting quiet at the United Nations. Oh, the delegates are still speaking, but on Thursday much of the discussion moved behind closed doors. It’s funny, actually. Every anti-gun delegate or activist talks about the need for “transparency” in firearms ownership, but those running the gun summit don’t seem that interested in transparency for what they’re doing.

    A few more countries gave their opening statements on Thursday. The representative from the Solomon Islands said, “the commitment of the Government of Solomon Islands in implementing the Program of Action is so much so that it has even banned the selling of toys guns sold in shops including collecting licensed arms for the purposes of rooting out a gun culture from growing in a small country.” I suppose you can’t blame the government of the island chain for being a little nervous. After all, the Bougainville Revolutionary Army fought a war for autonomy not too far away in Papua New Guinea, and there’s been a lot of unrest in the Solomons as of late. Better take everyone’s guns just to be safe.

    The highlight of the fourth day of the conference took place outside of the General Assembly (and the working day). Last evening an art exhibition was held in the General Assembly Visitors Lobby. Nothing says “politically conscious artist” like being anti-gun, and plenty of artists were willing to make an anti-gun statement. Perhaps the most unique was Colombian musician Cesar Lopez, who played his “escopetarra”. What is an escopetarra? It’s a guitar made out of an AK-47.
    I don’t know about you, but my first thought after hearing about this instrument was, “We’ve gotta get Ted Nugent one of those!” And therein lies the problem for the anti-gunners. Unwittingly, they’ve proven the point of gun owners that it’s the owner, not the object that matters. In the hands of Cesar Lopez, the gun-guitar is an anti-gun statement, but if it was Uncle Ted playing the “Star Spangled Banner” with his escopetarra it would be a statement about the 2nd amendment protecting his right to speak (and sing) about whatever he wanted.

    The same holds true for a gun itself. Many at the UN seem to think that arms in the hands of the State are fine, but arms in the hands of private citizens are uniformly bad. Luckily, the United States doesn’t hold that position. As Undersecretary Robert Joseph told the assembled nations earlier this week, “we recognize the rights of the oppressed to defend themselves against tyrannical and genocidal regimes and oppose a blanket ban on non-state actors.” Or as UN Ambassador John Bolton (then the Undesecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs) put it back in 2001 at the first small arms summit, “Distinctions between governments and non-governments are irrelevant in determining responsible and irresponsible end-users of arms.” It’s such a simple concept that you can’t help but wonder if the various nations suffer from a deficiency of common sense, or if they’re just willfully ignoring the truth.

    Today is Non Governmental Organization day at the United Nations. Various anti-gun groups will speak, including the spokeswoman for the International Action Network on Small Arms, Rebecca Peters. This is the same woman who in her 2004 debate with NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre said, “Yes, I believe that semiautomatic rifles and shotguns have no legitimate role in civilian hands. And not only that, handguns have no legitimate role in civilian hands.” Can’t you just imagine what she’ll say tomorrow?

    Actually, there’s no need to imagine. Tune in to “Cam and Company” on Sirius Patriot 144 or log onto http://www.NRAnews.com this afternoon at 3 p.m. Eastern for Executive Editor Ginny Simone’s live reports from the UN Gun Summit.

    Cam Edwards is the host of “Cam and Company” on http://www.nranews.com and Sirius Satellite Radio. A veteran talk show host and political analyst, he blogs at http://www.camedwards.com in addition to his daily talk show. Cam lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and five children.


  2. #2
    Campaign Veteran Dutch Uncle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    1,715

    Post imported post

    In the last century, tyrannical governments have slaughtered more than a hundred million people (Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, Communist China, and divers other tinpot dictatorships of all stripes). This dwarfs the numbers of those killed by criminal or negligent use of privately owned arms. It would then make much more sense for the UN to try to disarm the despotic nations of the world (starting with Kofi's homeland)and ENCOURAGE private ownership by responsible citizens. But that would be too reasonable, and we understnad that the brains of most liberals are logic-free zones.

    Parenthetically, Bush takes a lot of heat these days, even from conservatives like me who are disappointed with some of his approaches, but we need to remember that he went to the mat to get Bolton sent to the UN. For those who think Bush is no better than the Dems, just think who Gore or Kerry would have there right now. (Shudder)

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Mesilla/Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    74

    Post imported post

    AlaskanAtHeart wrote:
    Rebecca Peters is the same woman who in her 2004 debate with NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre said, “Yes, I believe that semiautomatic rifles and shotguns have no legitimate role in civilian hands. And not only that, handguns have no legitimate role in civilian hands.” Can’t you just imagine what she’ll say tomorrow?
    Yes I can. Perhaps something along the same line as George Will once said: "It's time to get rid of the embarassing Second Amendment."

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    San Antonio, TX, ,
    Posts
    83

    Post imported post

    AlaskanAtHeart

    Unfortunately, I haven't had a chance to keep up with the U.N. processions but I appreciate you keeping us posted.

    Regardless of what this bout of U.N. shenanigans determines, there is no way they can disarm the law abiding citizens of the US. I served my country, as many of you have done. Our rights will not be snuffed out by anyone, regardless of their "cause".

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Mechanicsville, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    548

    Post imported post

    panic215 wrote:
    AlaskanAtHeart

    Unfortunately, I haven't had a chance to keep up with the U.N. processions but I appreciate you keeping us posted.

    Regardless of what this bout of U.N. shenanigans determines, there is no way they can disarm the law abiding citizens of the US. I served my country, as many of you have done. Our rights will not be snuffed out by anyone, regardless of their "cause".
    Can I get an, "AMEN"!?!?!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •