Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Nonlethal weapons touted for use on citizens

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    158

    Post imported post

    please take a look at this article: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14806772/?GT1=8506

    something just seems fundamentally wrong with this, or is it just me? they try to take away our fundamental constitutional rights to protect ourselves, but they're willing to induce WWII era Hitler-esque (i believe his scientists were working on things like this for military purposes, please correct me if i'm wrong) devices on us! wow. i'm am officially speechless now.

  2. #2
    State Pioneer ConditionThree's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Shasta County, California, USA
    Posts
    2,231

    Post imported post

    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -Edward Abbey

    If our government is testing Microwave weapons to use against us, perhaps we should be testing EMP weapons to counter thistechnology.

    To answer your question; Yes, there is something fundamentally wrong with a government that is seeking to not only disarm the public, but also control it through use of force.
    New to OPEN CARRY in California? Click and read this first...

    NA MALE SUBJ ON FOOT, LS NB 3 AGO HAD A HOLSTERED HANDGUN ON HIS RIGHT HIP. WAS NOT BRANDISHING THE WEAPON, BUT RP FOUND SUSPICIOUS.
    CL SUBJ IN COMPLIANCE WITH LAW


    Support the 2A in California - Shop Amazon for any item and up to 15% of all purchases go back to the Calguns Foundation. Enter through either of the following links
    www.calgunsfoundation.org/amazon
    www.shop42a.com

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Burke/Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    998

    Post imported post

    :shock::shock::shock:

    They don't want to use it against people we are at WAR with, but they want use it against me and you because it wouldn't bother the international press!

    "An armed man is a citizen.An unarmed man is a subject."

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    158

    Post imported post

    actually, from the way i read it, they do want to use it against people at war, at least that was it's initial conception was, but they want to "test it" first to make sure it won't cause waves in the international community for harming people too much and being unsafe. so what's their answer? test on your own countrymen first! i'm sure that's exactly what the terrorists would love to see. you know, we have to be careful of their feelings too, we don't want to inadvertantly hurt them. again, all i can say is wow. i'm just glad to know i'm not the only one that sees the shock and awe of this. thanks.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Burke/Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    998

    Post imported post

    darrel_h wrote:
    actually, from the way i read it, they do want to use it against people at war, at least that was it's initial conception was, but they want to "test it" first to make sure it won't cause waves in the international community for harming people too much and being unsafe. so what's their answer? test on your own countrymen first! i'm sure that's exactly what the terrorists would love to see. you know, we have to be careful of their feelings too, we don't want to inadvertantly hurt them. again, all i can say is wow. i'm just glad to know i'm not the only one that sees the shock and awe of this. thanks.
    Iread it that way too. I just didn't make it exactly clear in my OP.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •