Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Complete Preemption Introduced - LB695

  1. #1
    Founder's Club Member - Moderator Gray Peterson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lynnwood, Washington, USA
    Posts
    2,238

    Post imported post

    LB695

    Pertinent part to open carriers is Section 5 of the bill:

    Sec. 5. Cities and villages shall not have the power to
    regulate the ownership, possession, or transportation of firearms,
    except as expressly provided by state law, and any existing
    ordinances, permits, or regulations regulating the ownership,
    possession, or transportation of firearms are declared null and
    void.

    That means Omaha's open carry licensing scheme would get struck down.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    5

    Post imported post

    I just discovered this site today. This is great! I live in South Sioux City and they have a ban on concealed carry. Their police chief is a $*"!!* when it comes to guns in "HIS" town. Open carry is out of the question there.

    If you read our state constitution concerning the right to keep and bear arms it says;

    Article I-1
    Statement of rights.
    [size=-1 xmlns=""]

    All persons are by nature free and independent, and have certain inherent and inalienable rights; among these are life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the right to keep and bear arms for security or defense of self, family, home, and others, and for lawful common defense, hunting, recreational use, and all other lawful purposes,
    and such rights shall not be denied or infringed by the state or any subdivision thereof.
    To secure these rights, and the protection of property, governments are instituted among people, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

    [size=-1 xmlns=""]Source:


    • Neb. Const. art. I, sec. 1 (1875);

      Amended 1988, Initiative Measure No. 403.

    • It seems pretty clear that ANY law that goes against the state constitution is void.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    5

    Post imported post

    I am winning. The city's safety committee has recommended that all references to firearms be removed from their ordinance.

  4. #4
    State Researcher
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Just a "wannabe" in Mtn. Top, Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    1,441

    Post imported post

    Jeffrey wrote:
    I am winning. The city's safety committee has recommended that all references to firearms be removed from their ordinance.
    Keep it up! Sometimes it is one single person that fixes these things.



  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    6

    Post imported post

    Source: http://uniweb.legislature.ne.gov/Leg...ge=c0111005000

    Article XI-5

    Charter of city of 100,000; home rule charter authorized. The charter of any city having a population of more than one hundred thousand inhabitants may be adopted as the home rule charter of such city by a majority vote of the qualified electors of such city voting upon the question, and when so adopted may thereafter be changed or amended as provided in Section 4 of this article, subject to the Constitution and laws of the state.

    Source: Neb. Const. art. XIa, sec. 5 (1920); Adopted 1920, Constitutional Convention, 1919-1920, No. 33; Transferred by Constitutional Convention, 1919-1920, art. XI, sec. 5.

    Technically they cannot circumvent concealed carry under a "home rule" doctrine. See that?

    subject to the Constitution and laws of the state.
    These cities cannot simply "opt out" of Statutes; 69-2428, 69-2429, 69-2445, etc. and Article I-1 of our state Consitution.


    Another thing. Not only is home rule doctrine authorized as long as it falls within the confines of state law, but it is only authorized for cities with a minimum population of 100,000. How big is Sioux City (Nebraska side)?


    P.S. There is another "home rule" for metropolitan populations of 300,000 or more, but I didn't post it as I don't find it relevant to this conversation.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    5

    Post imported post

    South Sioux City is around 12-15000 is all. Depends if they count the illegals, oops I mean "undocumented guest workers and their extended families".

    New ordinance passed on the first reading.

    It's still illegal to carry concealed these items; IRON knuckles, Brass knuckles, knives with 4" or longer blades. I stated thatmy aluminum knuckles were apparently OK to carry then. I got no reply.

  7. #7
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    34,604

    Post imported post

    Hope that this makes it all the way and becomes the law of the land.

    Born in Nebraska but live in Virginia.
    Come on guys make it happen!
    Yata hey
    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training. Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  8. #8
    Regular Member Smurfologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Springfield by way of Chicago, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    536

    Post imported post

    Grapeshot wrote:
    Hope that this makes it all the way and becomes the law of the land.

    Born in Nebraska but live in Virginia.
    Come on guys make it happen!
    Yata hey
    I hear ya, Grapeshot!! Welcome Jeffrey! Preemption, you gotta love it!!

    2nd Amendment........Use it........Or, lose it!!:X
    The 2nd Amendment... brought to you by Beretta and the number 1791!!

  9. #9
    State Researcher
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lebanon, VA
    Posts
    676

    Post imported post

    Nebraska also need to enact some form of reciprocity law (preferably unilateral recognition of all other states' permits)so permitholders from other states can carry there and vice versa.
    James M. "Jim" Mullins, Jr., Esq.
    Admitted to practice in West Virginia and Florida.

    Founder, Past President, Treasurer, and General Counsel, West Virginia Citizens Defense League, Inc.
    Life Member, NRA

  10. #10
    Regular Member Smurfologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Springfield by way of Chicago, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    536

    Post imported post

    WVCDL wrote:
    Nebraska also need to enact some form of reciprocity law (preferably unilateral recognition of all other states' permits)so permitholders from other states can carry there and vice versa.
    I concur.

    2nd Amendment......Use it.......Or, lose it!!:X
    The 2nd Amendment... brought to you by Beretta and the number 1791!!

  11. #11
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    34,604

    Post imported post

    Smurfologist wrote:
    WVCDL wrote:
    Nebraska also need to enact some form of reciprocity law (preferably unilateral recognition of all other states' permits)so permitholders from other states can carry there and vice versa.
    I concur.

    2nd Amendment......Use it.......Or, lose it!!:X
    I passed on an opportunity to "go home" for a visit because of the lack of reciprocity - I will not "go naked" especially in Omaha.
    Yata hey
    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training. Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •