Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: US Supremes identify police contact categories

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    America, ,

    Post imported post

    The United States Supreme Court has identified three categories of
    police contact with persons. The first is referred to as a
    "consensual encounter" in which there is no restraint on the
    person's liberty. There need be no objective justification for such
    an encounter. The second type, called "detention," involves a
    seizure of the individual for a limited duration and for limited
    purposes. A constitutionally acceptable detention can occur "if
    there is an articulable suspicion that a person has committed or is
    about to commit a crime." The third type involves seizures in the
    nature of an arrest, which may occur only if the police have
    probable cause to arrest the person for a crime. People v. Hughes
    (2002) 27 Cal.4th 287 In re James D. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 903 People v.
    Bailey (1985) 176 Cal.App.3d 402 Wilson v. Superior Court (1983) 34
    Cal.3d 777 FLORIDA v. ROYER, 460 U.S. 491 (1983) In re Miguel G.
    (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 345
    Nevertheless the violator is, during the period immediately
    preceding his execution of the promise to appear, under arrest.
    (People v. Weitzer (1969) 269 Cal.App.2d 274, 294 [75 Cal.Rptr.
    318]; People v. Valdez (1966) 239 Cal.App.2d 459, 462 [48 Cal.Rptr.
    840].) fn. 2 Some courts have been reluctant to use the term
    "arrest" to describe the status of the traffic violator on the
    public street waiting for the officer to write out the citation (see
    People v. Nunn (1968) 264 Cal.App.2d 919, 923, fn. 4 [70 Cal.Rptr.
    869]; People v. Wohlleben (1968) 261 Cal.App.2d 461, 463 [67
    Cal.Rptr. 826]; People v. Nieto (1966) 247 Cal.App.2d 364, 369 [55
    Cal.Rptr. 546]. The Vehicle Code however, refers to the person
    awaiting citation as "the arrested person." fn. 3 Viewing the
    situation functionally, the violator is being detained against his
    will by a police officer, for the purpose of obtaining his
    appearance in connection with a forthcoming prosecution. The
    violator is not free to depart until he has satisfactorily
    identified himself and has signed the written promise to appear.
    People v. Hubbard, 9 Cal.App.3d 827 [Crim. No. 17355. Court of
    Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Four.
    July 22, 1970.]
    Has the police officer made an arrest at the time he activates the
    red light?
    If not then how do we define the period of time from the time the
    red light is activated until the cop breaks out the NTA to prepare,
    Consensual Encounter, Detention, or Seizure? What term has the
    courts used to identify this period of time? When the red light is
    activated does that constitute "contact"? When the red light is
    activated are we required to stop or merely pull over to allow the
    emergency vehicle pass unobstructed? Where is it written that
    someone SHALL halt when they observe a red light in the mirror or be
    subject to criminal prosecution, and what would be the charge,
    criminal "evading"? "Evading" what????? What is the time frame
    identified as between the activation of the red light and the actual
    initial contact where the cop in fact says something? Has the
    Legislature specified the existence of the "crime" of "evading" a
    consensual encounter?
    -- If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have
    to worry about answers. Thomas Pynchon
    If evidence of a fact is clear, positive, uncontradicted and 
    of such nature it cannot rationally be disbelieved, the court 
    must instruct that fact has been established as a matter of law. 
    Roberts v. Del Monte Properties Co., 111 CA2d. 69 (1952).
    They will do whatever we let them get away with. 
    Joseph Heller
    When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however
    improbable, must be the truth. [Sir Arthur Conan Doyle]

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    West Haven, Connecticut, USA

    Post imported post

    Do you have the citation for this opinion? Is it a recent one?

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    America, ,

    Post imported post

    cites are listed

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts