LeagueOf1291
Regular Member
imported post
I read someone post in response to an article about a mass murderer who was shot by an armed citizen.
Someone argued that if there was a law against having guns, there wouldn't have been any deaths to start with.
This is incomprehensibly stupid. The law against murder didn't stop the killer, but a law against gun possession would have?? :banghead:
I thought I'd ask you all -- what is the stupidest anti-gun argument you've ever heard?
I read someone post in response to an article about a mass murderer who was shot by an armed citizen.
Someone argued that if there was a law against having guns, there wouldn't have been any deaths to start with.
This is incomprehensibly stupid. The law against murder didn't stop the killer, but a law against gun possession would have?? :banghead:
I thought I'd ask you all -- what is the stupidest anti-gun argument you've ever heard?