• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Did the journalist loophole cause full auto firearms theft?

Doug Huffman

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
9,180
Location
Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin,
imported post

http://www.ohioccw.org/content/view/3848/83/

Written by Jeff Garvas Wednesday, 28 March 2007
The extremely rare Class 3 license allows an individual to possess fully automatic firearms and is usually sought by collectors. To obtain a Class 3 license you must supply the BATFE with two photos that are kept on file, pay a $200 tax for the mere privilege per firearm, and have your local law enforcement sign off their permission of you possessing such a firearm.

One individual in Springfield Township went through the process of becoming a lawful owner of an M-60 machine gun only to have it stolen by burglars who clearly targeted him.

Did the news media's facination with releasing the names of gun owners, many who own homes at street addresses readily available via county government property records websites, cause this second large scale theft of privately owned firearms in Northwest Ohio?

WTOL in Toledo reported this incident Tuesday night and included the obligatory full auto video on their website.
"They're awesome weapons. They're war things, relics, trophies," the gun owner said.

At 2 a.m. Tuesday, he noticed the guns were gone. His apartment and trophy case had both been broken into.

"He came home and found his back door kicked in and had a gun safe that had been pried open," said Lucas County Detective Mark Woodruff.​
In an impressive move, WTOL-TV in Toledo didn't show the face of the owner, nor did they identify him beyond "the gun owner" or show where he lives. Since we don't know who he is, and since the television station didn't indicate if he had a license to carry a concealed handgun, we can only assume that someone who went through the process to obtain a Class 3 license probably would get an Ohio License to carry a concealed handgun.

What we'll likely never know is if the criminals targeted this home knowing that the occupants owned some kind of firearm due to the name being printed in a newspaper or on a television news station's website.

OFCC has long argued that there are definitely sophisticated criminals out there intentionally and purposefully targeting the homes of people whose names match those on concealed handgun license lists published by those who exploit the journalist loophole.

The clear solution is to immediately cease the release of any information on gun owners to anyone outside of law enforcement in the State of Ohio or "everything must be public records" champions themselves will bear the responsibility of empowering criminals to steal otherwise lawfully owned guns and put them on the streets.

In this case, an unknown number of fully automatic firearms are now on the black market, quite possibly because of the news media's right to intimidate.
 

DoubleR

Campaign Veteran
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
689
Location
Fairfax County, VA, ,
imported post

Good find, Doug.I tell you, with all the recent publicity about the publishing of this personal information, all across the country, I can almost guarantee that the criminals are now watching for this information. The individual states, at the urging of the law-abiding-citizens, must legislate this sensitive information out of the public's hands in some manner.
 

HankT

State Researcher
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
6,215
Location
Invisible Mode
imported post

This is a poor case built on mostly poor assumptions. One good assumption is that the machine gunner theft victim was targeted. The rest are flimsy.

Anytime someoneuses the "we can only assume" line, watch your wallet and carefully scrutinize what the writer is trying to sell.

Why would anyone bother to peck out such a slimly-justified speculation? We can only assume that he must be invested in a specific (foregone, for him) conclusion. Since Garvas is trying to get a list of the OhioCCW holders or to get the "journalist loophole" closed, this little excercise must be part of that.

Entertaining, but not effective. Ironically, if Garvis gets his list he will, by his own logic, be a suspect in any future "full auto firearms thefts." That would bekind of humorous.




Doug Huffman wrote: [/b]


http://www.ohioccw.org/content/view/3848/83/

Written by Jeff Garvas Wednesday, 28 March 2007
The extremely rare Class 3 license allows ...
One individual in Springfield Township went through the process of becoming a lawful owner of an M-60 machine gun only to have it stolen by burglars who clearly targeted him.

Did the news media's facination with releasing the names of gun owners, many who own homes at street addresses readily available via county government property records websites, cause this second large scale theft of privately owned firearms in Northwest Ohio?

WTOL in Toledo reported this incident Tuesday night and included the obligatory full auto video on their website.
"They're awesome weapons. They're war things, relics, trophies," the gun owner said.

At 2 a.m. Tuesday, he noticed the guns were gone. His apartment and trophy case had both been broken into.

"He came home and found his back door kicked in and had a gun safe that had been pried open," said Lucas County Detective Mark Woodruff.​
In an impressive move, WTOL-TV in Toledo didn't show the face of the owner, nor did they identify him beyond "the gun owner" or show where he lives. Since we don't know who he is, and since the television station didn't indicate if he had a license to carry a concealed handgun, we can only assume that someone who went through the process to obtain a Class 3 license probably would get an Ohio License to carry a concealed handgun.

What we'll likely never know is if the criminals targeted this home knowing that the occupants owned some kind of firearm due to the name being printed in a newspaper or on a television news station's website.

OFCC has long argued that there are definitely sophisticated criminals out there intentionally and purposefully targeting the homes of people whose names match those on concealed handgun license lists published by those who exploit the journalist loophole.

The clear solution is to immediately cease the release of any information on gun owners to anyone outside of law enforcement in the State of Ohio or "everything must be public records" champions themselves will bear the responsibility of empowering criminals to steal otherwise lawfully owned guns and put them on the streets.

In this case, an unknown number of fully automatic firearms are now on the black market, quite possibly because of the news media's right to intimidate.
 
Top