IanB
Regular Member
imported post
.
.
Interesting, that you should be getting Brady Campaign e-mails, nakedshoplifter...:quirky
I think a logical place to start would be "_____ you Brady Campaign!"Twisted views of the Second Amendment?!
60 years of precedent?!!
I was about to go a rant but, man, where do you start...
HankT wrote:Interesting, that you should be getting Brady Campaign e-mails, nakedshoplifter...:quirky
Know your enemy... :idea:
EDIT: Why trouble oneself to find out ... if you can sign up for the enemy's regular bulletin?
:celebrate
The guarantee to be able to own and carry firearms came even BEFORE the U.S. Constitution and the constitutions of all 50 states. Framers of the U.S. Constitution knew that this natural right was the simple ability to defend themselves, and ironically, the more dangerous was the government, not the bad guys! The arguments put forth by the D.C. group were weak and they still do not have their act together, filing for, and getting, a second delay at the Supreme Court. People like Bloomberg and cities of Chicago and many others will be looking and helping as much as they can. Because this is a weak case, THIS might be the best one to settle the 2nd amendment question in the eyes of anti-gun zealots. My sense is that if you are among the folks ticked off for one reason or another at the NRA, you might consider getting over it. They will need all the help they can get, and from wherever they can. The Feinsteins of this republic are hell-bent on taking up all handguns, and the rifles and shotguns if they can get them. The fundamental arguments are NOT gun control, they are the registration, confiscation and destruction of every firearm they can get, any way they can get them. (By act of Congress, back-door politics, or by the more liberal Supreme Court members). Remember this anti-gun crowd has already tried to sue gunmakers into oblivion, do straw sales and control legal gun sales in Georgia, Virginia, etc. They are trying to stamp cases with I.D. numbers using the firearm to do it. Pretty soon, you will have to have every shotgun pellet labeled at the rate they are going. Please do not sit this one out, help in any way you can to preserve the 2nd amendment and the individual ownership of firearms. Many of these anti-gun folks are hypocrites, they have carry permits, government and/or personal protection and they want to take away YOUR firearms? So they are not QUITE stupid, they know that firearms can be used to protect themselves and their families, but not yours. Also, we don't need any firearms to hunt, fish, do sport and competition shooting, etc. They will see to that. Please get off your gluteus maximus and get involved, NOW.T-RaV wrote:I think a logical place to start would be "_____ you Brady Campaign!"Twisted views of the Second Amendment?!
60 years of precedent?!!
I was about to go a rant but, man, where do you start...
There is hope! I have another good reason to keep fighting the good fight.:celebrateThe Brady Bunch is rightfully scared!
It will take time, but if Parker is upheld, the '86 Machine gun ban is toast.
That scares the Brady Bunch to heck and back.
I totally agree with this statement. The gun control groups' more accurate descriptor would be "gun revocation advates." These purportedly "minor" gun ownership and carrying restrictions will continue to snowball until we have complete registration, and ultimately, confiscation.The fundamental arguments are NOT gun control, they are the registration, confiscation and destruction of every firearm they can get, any way they can get them. (By act of Congress, back-door politics, or by the more liberal Supreme Court members).
Discussing the merits (or not) of that bill, is not what this thread is about, however.
My sense is that if you are among the folks ticked off for one reason or another at the NRA, you might consider getting over it.
They most certainly do! http://www.washingtonceasefire.net/content/view/60/35/I bet their tune would change if they were ever held at gunpoint.