• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Judge to rule on legality of abusive driver [Albo] fees

Doug Huffman

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
9,180
Location
Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin,
imported post

The Washington Times wrote in an crAP story http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070727/METRO/107270071/1004

RICHMOND — The first court ruling on whether harsh new fees Virginia imposes on its worst drivers are constitutional is due from a Henrico County judge within a week.

Attorneys for Anthony Price, convicted yesterday of driving on a suspended license for the fifth time, argued that forcing Mr. Price to pay $750 in fees that don't apply to people who live outside Virginia violates the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law.

Judge Archie Yeatts said he will rule on the motion by Thursday. The decision will set off a series of appeals that could reach the state Supreme Court.

The case unwittingly thrust Mr. Price, a shy carpet installer, into the vanguard of an intense statewide furor over "civil remedial fees" that took effect July 1.

Mr. Price declined to comment as he left the courthouse with his grandmother, his ride to and from court.

Virginians outraged that nonresidents are exempt from the fees have clamored for the law's immediate repeal in a special legislative session while defense lawyers work to overturn the law in court. By yesterday, nearly 162,000 people had signed an online petition calling for a repeal of the law.

Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, on his monthly radio program on Richmond's WRVA and the Virginia News Network, continued to oppose calling lawmakers back to Richmond before the regular session in January.

"This was part of a comprehensive transportation package to try and raise money for transportation and you got a lot of citizens out there that say, 'By gosh, don't raise our taxes; find money another way.' Be careful what you wish for," said Mr. Kaine, a Democrat.

The fees were passed this year to help endow the first major transportation funding law in a generation. They range from the fee Mr. Price may have to pay — three annual installments of $250 — to $3,000 over three years for driving-related felonies. Because lawmakers wanted the revenue for highway maintenance, they enacted the surcharges as fees, which Virginia is powerless to collect outside its boundaries. The state can collect fines anywhere, but the state Constitution mandates that revenue from fines be used exclusively for education, not transportation. By limiting the fees to Virginians, the state chose unconstitutionally to apply the law unequally to state residents alone, said one of Mr. Price's attorneys, Craig S. Cooley. "The state cannot discriminate against one class of people," Mr. Cooley told Judge Yeatts. "If we're going to be assessing these fees from dangerous drivers, then we ought to be assessing it from everybody, resident or nonresident." Judge Yeatts pressed Henrico's chief deputy commonwealth's attorney, Duncan P. Reid, on whether a government could penalize some people and excuse others for the same offense. "Let me ask you this," the judge said, looking at Mr. Reid. "Could the legislature pass legislation that would impose these fees only on out-of-state residents?" Mr. Reid said such a consideration is moot because if the court determines there is a rational basis for the law, it survives any challenge brought on 14th Amendment grounds. There is rationale aplenty for the abusive driver penalties, Mr. Reid said, including the goal of discouraging bad driving, the higher cost of out-of-state collections and the supposition that homegrown abusive drivers are a full-time problem unlike bad drivers who are just passing through. "If you're going to collect money from someone in New York or Alaska or Alabama, it's going to cost more than to collect from someone living in Virginia," Mr. Reid said. Judge Yeatts scheduled a hearing for Thursday to deliver his ruling to Mr. Reid, Mr. Cooley and Mr. Price's other court-appointed attorney, Esther Windmueller. The ruling would be binding only in Henrico County. Should Judge Yeatts find the law unconstitutional, the state's automatic expedited appeals would put the case quickly before a Henrico Circuit Court judge and toward a state Supreme Court showdown. Mr. Price pleaded no contest to driving on a suspended license, and Judge Yeatts found him guilty. He fined Mr. Price $200, gave him about a month of jail time and suspended his license for 90 days.
 

JeffersonDavis

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2007
Messages
105
Location
Chesapeake, Virginia, USA
imported post

Warner got in office with the offer to let us vote on his road tax plan. He won by a good margin. When we voted we voted against it. He closed the DMV's two days a week and limited their hours (to save budget money;)). There were 3 and 4 hour waits at the DMV. It was payback for the vote.......It sounds like Kaine is making a veiled threat so I expect some retaliation........Like long lines at the DMV...
 

Hawkflyer

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
3,309
Location
Prince William County, Virginia, USA
imported post

It is interesting how this is being portrayed. Setting aside other issues, out of state drivers could be charged these fees just as they are charged court fees now. The court fees MUST be paid at the time the fines are paid. There is no reason that this could not have been done for out of state drivers in the case of Albo fees. The only difference is that out of state drivers would have to pay them up front.

Other states such as New York, charge Virginia drivers fees on convictions all the time, and they don't seem to have problems collecting them. This is just more BS from the Kaine political machine.

regards
 

SIGguy229

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
349
Location
Stafford, VA, , Afghanistan
imported post

The smugness of "be careful of what you wish for"--just who does he think he's talking to? How about--"O.k., this plan didn't work out right...what's the next plan?" Kaine is upset that the majority of the people were unhappy with his cr*p plan--and he has the audacity to get mad at us? Tough cookies....find a job where you actually have to make a living...instead of living off the public teat.
 

openryan

State Researcher
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
1,602
Location
, Indiana, USA
imported post

Wow, I feel sorry for you guys over in Virginia, where is all the money going that it needs to come to this?
 

openryan

State Researcher
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
1,602
Location
, Indiana, USA
imported post

Hawkflyer wrote:
openryan wrote:
Wow, I feel sorry for you guys over in Virginia, where is all the money going that it needs to come to this?

Five VDOT employees standing around watching a sixth operate a shovel.
Ha! Works the same over here usually, which is the downside to unions, although I am not going to bash them in a public forum, this alone is probably enough to piss a few of you off :)

Do you not have a tolling system in VA?

Oh I almost forgot! -- The Flaggers! The most useless person on a crew, I saw 4 of these 'flaggers' on the way back from Chicago yesterday (and hank, I did not carry this time!) I can see certain situations where these folks might be the tiniest bit useful, but entirely a job that could be done by a sign, a sign that doesn't B**** and moan!
 
Top