• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Sickening

massltca

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
407
Location
Maryville, Tennessee, USA
imported post

MamaLiberty wrote:
Thanks, TB... I lurk once in a while, but sometimes just can't help jumping in. ;)

HankT - Just what gives you the right to decide anything for someone else? How is that ethical? It isn't. That's the screwed up "ethics" behind all of the prohibitionists.

You'd take the guns "for their own good." You have decided for them what is for their "good." You have decided that they are no longer sovereign individuals, but wards of your benevolent and superior intelligence --- or whatever.

Well, that's exactly the rationale behind everything that has destroyed our liberty, our integrity, our ability to live our lives in peace. In some sick and horrible ways, it's what causes politicians to invade little bitty countries and tell them how to live as well - while killing anyone who doesn't accept their benevolence.

A lot of people decided - FOR US - that we're too stupid or suicidal or childish to be trusted with guns, or alcohol, or cigarettes. As far as the meddlers are concerned, we can't really be trusted to do anything much without their permission and under their guidelines...

Suicide is a terrible thing. As a hospice nurse, I dealt with the subject many times and even experienced the aftermath for families a few times when patients chose to speed up their departure. None of them used guns, but it's not unknown in hospice.

I invite you to take a closer look at suicide today. If you are interested, send me a PM and I'll get some links to you that might help you understand better.

Suicide used to be quite rare in this country. When people were completely responsible for themselves and their families, and free to live their lives as they saw fit, it just didn't happen often.

Contrast that with society today where people have been taught for generations that "somebody else" is responsible, that someone else should and must direct their lives and make major decisions for them. Consider the deliberate destruction of the family, marriage, honor and integrity that has gone on at least since 1860!!

These things and all the other evils of socialist, collectivist imposition on everyone, especially the young people, produce hopelessness, powerlessness and rage. These are the basic cause of suicide, not guns. And taking someone's gun isn't going to change any of it.
I couldn't have said it better myself. In order to be really happy you have to be in control of your own destiny.
 

openryan

State Researcher
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
1,602
Location
, Indiana, USA
imported post

massltca wrote:
MamaLiberty wrote:
Thanks, TB... I lurk once in a while, but sometimes just can't help jumping in. ;)

HankT - Just what gives you the right to decide anything for someone else? How is that ethical? It isn't. That's the screwed up "ethics" behind all of the prohibitionists.

You'd take the guns "for their own good." You have decided for them what is for their "good." You have decided that they are no longer sovereign individuals, but wards of your benevolent and superior intelligence --- or whatever.

Well, that's exactly the rationale behind everything that has destroyed our liberty, our integrity, our ability to live our lives in peace. In some sick and horrible ways, it's what causes politicians to invade little bitty countries and tell them how to live as well - while killing anyone who doesn't accept their benevolence.

A lot of people decided - FOR US - that we're too stupid or suicidal or childish to be trusted with guns, or alcohol, or cigarettes. As far as the meddlers are concerned, we can't really be trusted to do anything much without their permission and under their guidelines...

Suicide is a terrible thing. As a hospice nurse, I dealt with the subject many times and even experienced the aftermath for families a few times when patients chose to speed up their departure. None of them used guns, but it's not unknown in hospice.

I invite you to take a closer look at suicide today. If you are interested, send me a PM and I'll get some links to you that might help you understand better.

Suicide used to be quite rare in this country. When people were completely responsible for themselves and their families, and free to live their lives as they saw fit, it just didn't happen often.

Contrast that with society today where people have been taught for generations that "somebody else" is responsible, that someone else should and must direct their lives and make major decisions for them. Consider the deliberate destruction of the family, marriage, honor and integrity that has gone on at least since 1860!!

These things and all the other evils of socialist, collectivist imposition on everyone, especially the young people, produce hopelessness, powerlessness and rage. These are the basic cause of suicide, not guns. And taking someone's gun isn't going to change any of it.
I couldn't have said it better myself. In order to be really happy you have to be in control of your own destiny.
So in order to be happy you have to kill yourself? I mean you cannot fully be in control of your own fate unless you do I suppose, natural causes, or a car accident would obviously not be of ones choice (in most cases), I think the argument could be made both ways.

The only people I have a problem with who kill themselves are the ones who do it in front of other people and the ones who want to take others with them.

My girlfriends neighbor commited suicide, and he was a loner, nobody knew until it smelled so bad in the summer, he was dead for over a month.

Another chilling story -- a friend of my fathers, his wife was sick and dying I believe it was of cancer... Anyway she asked for her husband to shoot and kill her, he went along with it. He ended up killing her, then called their daughter and said "I just killed your mother now I am going to kill myself, I love you." *Click* Talk about a freaky call, by the time she got there they were both dead, I guess you could say it was out of love in some twisted way, sad, but I guess some people either do not want to deal with any pain, either psychological or physical, or just do not see any other way out...
 

Doug Huffman

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
9,180
Location
Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin,
imported post

"Freedom's just another word for nothin' left to lose!" If you are not free to end your own life can you say that you are 'free' or that your life was ever your own?

Two personal anecdotes do not data make.

Either we are equal or we are not. Good people ought to be armed where they will, with wits and guns and the truth. NRA KMA$$
 

openryan

State Researcher
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
1,602
Location
, Indiana, USA
imported post

Doug Huffman wrote:
"Freedom's just another word for nothin' left to lose!" If you are not free to end your own life can you say that you are 'free' or that your life was ever your own?

Two personal anecdotes do not data make. (Data make?)

Either we are equal or we are not. Good people ought to be armed where they will, with wits and guns and the truth. NRA KMA$$
I just threw the stories in there, I thought they were interesting.

Who told you freedom is another word for nothing left to lose or who are you quoting? Sounds like a sloppy definition to me at best.
 

openryan

State Researcher
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
1,602
Location
, Indiana, USA
imported post

This might sound a little off topic, but isnt animal instinct to survive, is there any animal besides a human being that willfully terminates their life?
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
imported post

openryan wrote:
This might sound a little off topic, but isnt animal instinct to survive, is there any animal besides a human being that willfully terminates their life?

Who you callin' "animal?" :)
 

ixtow

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
5,038
Location
Suwannee County, FL
imported post

Discussions of suicide were the first discussions that started to break the socialist training I had absorbed.

I asked a 'dangerous' question: "If it's my life, why can't I do what I want with it? Why can't I end it if I want? It's MINE! Screw off!!!"

It all snowballed from there. And gave me will to live at the same time. ;-) Could there be anything more important than undermining the underminers?
 

Particle

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2007
Messages
134
Location
, , USA
imported post

How about suicide by manual detonation of nuclear device? Expensive, but definately a way to ensure success and "go out with a bang". Bonus: There wouldn't need to be a funeral with all of the expensive and sad mess that goes with traditional suicides.
 

Doug Huffman

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
9,180
Location
Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin,
imported post

If words mean things, Troll, it is not possible to 'manually detonate a nuclear device.' (Hell, if words mean things, they don't detonate.) It is not even possible to set off a 'nuclear device' single handedly.

Are they "suicide bombers," as the MSM would have us believe, or homicide bombers?

Time to lock the thread?

Either we are equal or we are not. Good people ought to be armed where they will, with wits and guns and the truth. NRA KMA$$
 

HankT

State Researcher
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
6,215
Location
Invisible Mode
imported post

Doug Huffman wrote:
If words mean things, Troll, it is not possible to 'manually detonate a nuclear device.' ....

...

Time to lock the thread?

Only a tyrant can censor. Only a tyrant-wannabe will suggest censorship.

Is the tyrant's purpose tocensor or to prevent discussion?


:p
 

Particle

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2007
Messages
134
Location
, , USA
imported post

:question:

I was just contributing another humorous example of ensured success when it comes to suicide. You'll notice there were a few preceding my own. I'm not quite sure what I did to provoke your reaction.
 

HankT

State Researcher
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
6,215
Location
Invisible Mode
imported post

Particle wrote:
:question:

I was just contributing another humorous example of ensured success when it comes to suicide. You'll notice there were a few preceding my own. I'm not quite sure what I did to provoke your reaction.

Doug likes toaccuse everyone he doesn't like of tyranny but, ironically,he likes it as muchas anyone else. When it suits his purpose. :p
 

HankT

State Researcher
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
6,215
Location
Invisible Mode
imported post

anim_rofl2.gif
 

1st freedom

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
317
Location
dumries, Virginia, USA
imported post

HankT wrote:
A gun is apopular tool for committing suicide. Also, t's the most successful tool choice for suicides. There are about 16,000 suicides a year that are done with guns.

And the gun is effective. Gunsuicide attemptsare "successful"about 90% of the time. Much greater than all other methods.

If you have someone in your family or someone you care for who is truly suicidal, take away their gun immediately. You will increasetheir chances of survival considerably.


If you do your homework Hank, you will find that in area's that require fire arms to be locked up while in the home the # of suicide's by a gun did go down, however suicide by other means went up ! The over all # of suicide"s went UNCHANGED,

John Lott has a couple of really good books you might want to read

And I agree with you about DH
 

massltca

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
407
Location
Maryville, Tennessee, USA
imported post

openryan wrote:
massltca wrote:
MamaLiberty wrote:
Thanks, TB... I lurk once in a while, but sometimes just can't help jumping in. ;)

HankT - Just what gives you the right to decide anything for someone else? How is that ethical? It isn't. That's the screwed up "ethics" behind all of the prohibitionists.

You'd take the guns "for their own good." You have decided for them what is for their "good." You have decided that they are no longer sovereign individuals, but wards of your benevolent and superior intelligence --- or whatever.

Well, that's exactly the rationale behind everything that has destroyed our liberty, our integrity, our ability to live our lives in peace. In some sick and horrible ways, it's what causes politicians to invade little bitty countries and tell them how to live as well - while killing anyone who doesn't accept their benevolence.

A lot of people decided - FOR US - that we're too stupid or suicidal or childish to be trusted with guns, or alcohol, or cigarettes. As far as the meddlers are concerned, we can't really be trusted to do anything much without their permission and under their guidelines...

Suicide is a terrible thing. As a hospice nurse, I dealt with the subject many times and even experienced the aftermath for families a few times when patients chose to speed up their departure. None of them used guns, but it's not unknown in hospice.

I invite you to take a closer look at suicide today. If you are interested, send me a PM and I'll get some links to you that might help you understand better.

Suicide used to be quite rare in this country. When people were completely responsible for themselves and their families, and free to live their lives as they saw fit, it just didn't happen often.

Contrast that with society today where people have been taught for generations that "somebody else" is responsible, that someone else should and must direct their lives and make major decisions for them. Consider the deliberate destruction of the family, marriage, honor and integrity that has gone on at least since 1860!!

These things and all the other evils of socialist, collectivist imposition on everyone, especially the young people, produce hopelessness, powerlessness and rage. These are the basic cause of suicide, not guns. And taking someone's gun isn't going to change any of it.
I couldn't have said it better myself. In order to be really happy you have to be in control of your own destiny.
So in order to be happy you have to kill yourself? I mean you cannot fully be in control of your own fate unless you do I suppose, natural causes, or a car accident would obviously not be of ones choice (in most cases), I think the argument could be made both ways.

The only people I have a problem with who kill themselves are the ones who do it in front of other people and the ones who want to take others with them.

My girlfriends neighbor commited suicide, and he was a loner, nobody knew until it smelled so bad in the summer, he was dead for over a month.

Another chilling story -- a friend of my fathers, his wife was sick and dying I believe it was of cancer... Anyway she asked for her husband to shoot and kill her, he went along with it. He ended up killing her, then called their daughter and said "I just killed your mother now I am going to kill myself, I love you." *Click* Talk about a freaky call, by the time she got there they were both dead, I guess you could say it was out of love in some twisted way, sad, but I guess some people either do not want to deal with any pain, either psychological or physical, or just do not see any other way out...
No you don't have to kill yourself to be happy, but you have to have the freedom to choose. I have a problem with people that want to kill themselves in front of people too. They just want the attention. As long as you don't infringe on someone else's rights then you should be free to do anything you want. Personallly I don't think that suicide is the answer, absent terminal ilness or something like that, but no one has the right to impose their will on another person.
 

MamaLiberty

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
894
Location
Newcastle, Wyoming, USA
imported post

As with everything else, we should start with some definitions.

Define "happy"

I wouldn't use that word in this context. A person must be satisfied with his/her life and able to control that life for the greatest mental and physical health. Ownership of our bodies and life is essential to that.

Our society (government "education," welfare, prison for anything and everything...) is set up to destroy individual liberty and self responsibility. We are treated from birth as if we were infants, owned by the government and every group of idiots who claim to know better than we do what to do with our lives and property - and then take all of it away from us at the point of a gun!!!

What is happening in that society shows very strong proof of how destructive that is.
From that powerlessness, hopelessness and anguish come all sorts of crime, violence and murder as well as suicide.

More "laws" and more pressure to conform - from all the nanny state groups that wet their pants if someone has an original thought - are not the answer.
 

openryan

State Researcher
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
1,602
Location
, Indiana, USA
imported post

MamaLiberty wrote:
As with everything else, we should start with some definitions.

Define "happy"

I wouldn't use that word in this context. A person must be satisfied with his/her life and able to control that life for the greatest mental and physical health. Ownership of our bodies and life is essential to that.

Our society (government "education," welfare, prison for anything and everything...) is set up to destroy individual liberty and self responsibility. We are treated from birth as if we were infants, owned by the government and every group of idiots who claim to know better than we do what to do with our lives and property - and then take all of it away from us at the point of a gun!!!

What is happening in that society shows very strong proof of how destructive that is.
From that powerlessness, hopelessness and anguish come all sorts of crime, violence and murder as well as suicide.

More "laws" and more pressure to conform - from all the nanny state groups that wet their pants if someone has an original thought - are not the answer.
Happy -- probably not the correct terminology -- content/satisfied/fulfillment might better suit our needs here.

I dont think everything is set up to destroy our liberties and sense of self, but a lot of it is, and people conform to these set standards, some of which or okay, some of which can be dangerous.

Suicide can sprout out of conformity especially once a person loses their sense of self, people want to be 'needed'.

That being said, I am kind of suprised this thread has gone so far...
 
Top