Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: 2 Corrections Officers(PWC) Charged With Having Sex With 1 Inmate

  1. #1
    Founder's Club Member - Moderator longwatch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Fauquier Co, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    4,297

    Post imported post

    Who watches the watchers?
    MyFoxDc
    2 Corrections Officers Charged With Having Sex With 1 Inmate
    Two female Prince William County corrections officers have been charged with having sexual relations with the same former inmate while he was still in the county's custody on house arrest.

    MANASSAS, Va. (AP) -- Two female Prince William County corrections officers have been charged with having sexual relations with the same former inmate while he was still in the county's custody on house arrest.

    The two women apparently never knew about each other, authorities said.

    Maria C. Torres-Corbin, 48, a master jail officer with nearly 20 years' experience, was arrested last week and charged with having carnal knowledge of an inmate, a felony. Torres-Corbin, of Fredericksburg, had recently been assigned to the work-release center, where she was responsible for checking on inmates in the electronic-monitoring program.

    Then, on Wednesday, police charged Tamara Fay Bonos, 32, with the same crime.

    Bonos, of Manassas, was an entry-level officer who worked at the main building of the regional jail for 18 months, said the jail's superintendent, Col. Charles "Skip" Land.

    Both women resigned following their arrests.

    "There is no indication that Torres-Corbin or Bonos knew about each other," Land said. "They just happened to be doing something with the same inmate."

    Police said the corrections officers were off-duty when the incidents occurred at the inmate's home. They said the man had been held in the county jail before he was put on work release and then on electronic monitoring while at home, police said.

    "It was consensual," Land said, "but if you read the code, the female officers had custodial rights over him. ... Therein lies the problem."

    Land said corrections officials will review policy and procedures in light of the arrests.

    If convicted, the women could face up to five years in prison.

    Related ItemsVideos Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Stafford, VA, , Afghanistan
    Posts
    349

    Post imported post

    eeeeww

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    469

    Post imported post

    If women that uh...unappealing had their way with me, I'd rather they sentenced me...to death. :shock:

  4. #4
    Regular Member zoom6zoom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dale City, VA, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    1,694

    Post imported post

    Well, you don't know what the "victim" looks like, either.

    Although I understand they did give him a nice ankle bracelet.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    4 hours south of HankT, ,
    Posts
    5,121

    Post imported post

    He was on work release in his own house. Call for delivery if you're that hard up.

    Seriously, it looks like this jerk took advantage of two women with low self-esteem (look at the photos) and now they are paying for it, while he runs his mouth on a radio show.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Chester, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    451

    Post imported post

    Tomahawk wrote:
    He was on work release in his own house. Call for delivery if you're that hard up.

    Seriously, it looks like this jerk took advantage of two women with low self-esteem (look at the photos) and now they are paying for it, while he runs his mouth on a radio show.
    Yes sir...thats what i was thinking

  7. #7
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    34,614

    Post imported post

    There is no limit to stupidity and there is plenty to go around. Low self esteem? Possibly. Need to feel good? Possibly. Did they know what they were doing was wrong? Without a doubt! Never, never play games with those incarcerated - you will lose.

    If you can not hold yourself to standards higher than that of inmates, then you will be no better than they are. And this is precisely what happened.

    Yata hey
    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training. Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    4 hours south of HankT, ,
    Posts
    5,121

    Post imported post

    Grapeshot wrote:
    There is no limit to stupidity and there is plenty to go around. Low self esteem? Possibly. Need to feel good? Possibly. Did they know what they were doing was wrong? Without a doubt! Never, never play games with those incarcerated - you will lose.

    If you can not hold yourself to standards higher than that of inmates, then you will be no better than they are. And this is precisely what happened.

    Yata hey
    Cool out. No one's making excuses for the guards. They are adults, they made their own beds and now they lie in them. I'm just saying the inmate's acting like a dirtbag and bears some responsibility.

  9. #9
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    34,614

    Post imported post

    Tomahawk wrote:
    Grapeshot wrote:
    There is no limit to stupidity and there is plenty to go around. Low self esteem? Possibly. Need to feel good? Possibly. Did they know what they were doing was wrong? Without a doubt! Never, never play games with those incarcerated - you will lose.

    If you can not hold yourself to standards higher than that of inmates, then you will be no better than they are. And this is precisely what happened.

    Yata hey
    Cool out. No one's making excuses for the guards. They are adults, they made their own beds and now they lie in them. I'm just saying the inmate's acting like a dirtbag and bears some responsibility.
    No animosity directed nor intended towards anyone contributing to this site. My chagrine was soley in reaction to the officers who chose to violate the public's trust, their sworn duty and common sense. The inmate did what such characters do - he got what he wanted plus succeded in reducing someone else to his level. Morally distasteful as it may be, he probably did not commit any prosecutable offense and possibly gained stature in his community. Then a radio station puts him on the air! Like I said there's no limit to stupidity.


    Yata hey
    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training. Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7,607

    Post imported post

    Grapeshot wrote:
    There is no limit to stupidity and there is plenty to go around. Low self esteem? Possibly. Need to feel good? Possibly. Did they know what they were doing was wrong? Without a doubt! Never, never play games with those incarcerated - you will lose.

    If you can not hold yourself to standards higher than that of inmates, then you will be no better than they are. And this is precisely what happened.

    Yata hey
    I am going to guess that you are not an "unattractive woman" that has wanteda man pay you some special attention you really needed.

    Let's keep one important thing in view here.

    The guyhad been released fromprison and wasat home. He was at his own house when the consensual acts occurred.

    As I understand it... The guards no longer had any control over him since he was outside and allowed to walk around freely while being monitored.

    I would see things a little different if they were banging him in the jail.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7,607

    Post imported post

    Wooley wrote:
    I think he was under house arrest at the time.
    He was.... But my point was this did not happen at the jail where he was under the physical control of the guards. They were at his house as guests while off duty.

    Should they have waited till after his house arrest? Ya... But is this a big deal? Not really.

  12. #12
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    34,614

    Post imported post

    LEO 229 wrote:
    Grapeshot wrote:
    There is no limit to stupidity and there is plenty to go around. Low self esteem? Possibly. Need to feel good? Possibly. Did they know what they were doing was wrong? Without a doubt! Never, never play games with those incarcerated - you will lose.

    If you can not hold yourself to standards higher than that of inmates, then you will be no better than they are. And this is precisely what happened.

    Yata hey
    I am going to guess that you are not an "unattractive woman" that has wanteda man pay you some special attention you really needed.

    Let's keep one important thing in view here.

    The guyhad been released fromprison and wasat home. He was at his own house when the consensual acts occurred.

    As I understand it... The guards no longer had any control over him since he was outside and allowed to walk around freely while being monitored.

    I would see things a little different if they were banging him in the jail.
    You do like to stir the pot don't you.

    When did what one "wanted" and "really needed" become an excuse?
    The inmate (former) was still under the control and authority of the state.
    Corrections Officers are limited in the type of contact they may have with present and former inmates.
    Their acts consitute a felony if proven true.

    So are we to conclude that you are apparently not an "unattractive woman" and find little fault with sleeping with the enemy?

    I find many faults with personal relationships of this type and so do the DOPs and IOPs.
    Yata hey
    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training. Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
    Posts
    3,806

    Post imported post

    How is that whole.... area not just a steaming pile now?
    Why open carry? Because 1911 > 911.

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7,607

    Post imported post

    Grapeshot wrote:
    LEO 229 wrote:
    Grapeshot wrote:
    There is no limit to stupidity and there is plenty to go around. Low self esteem? Possibly. Need to feel good? Possibly. Did they know what they were doing was wrong? Without a doubt! Never, never play games with those incarcerated - you will lose.

    If you can not hold yourself to standards higher than that of inmates, then you will be no better than they are. And this is precisely what happened.

    Yata hey
    I am going to guess that you are not an "unattractive woman" that has wanteda man pay you some special attention you really needed.

    Let's keep one important thing in view here.

    The guyhad been released fromprison and wasat home. He was at his own house when the consensual acts occurred.

    As I understand it... The guards no longer had any control over him since he was outside and allowed to walk around freely while being monitored.

    I would see things a little different if they were banging him in the jail.
    You do like to stir the pot don't you.

    When did what one "wanted" and "really needed" become an excuse?
    The inmate (former) was still under the control and authority of the state.
    Corrections Officers are limited in the type of contact they may have with present and former inmates.
    Their acts consitute a felony if proven true.

    So are we to conclude that you are apparently not an "unattractive woman" and find little fault with sleeping with the enemy?

    I find many faults with personal relationships of this type and so do the DOPs and IOPs.
    Yata hey

    So based on a job.. ugly woman are not allowed to get laid?!!

    I do not agree with what they did.. but it is human nature to do it.I do not really see it as a big deal in this case.

    Anyone find the actual code section yet?


  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
    Posts
    3,806

    Post imported post

    If they do, they should use this as their avatar.

    Why open carry? Because 1911 > 911.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7,607

    Post imported post

    Wooley wrote:
    Just think, if I had hung out near the jail I could have saved at least one of them from charges!:shock:
    True..... but you know there is a chance there will be another encounter.

    Take Citizen with you in case she has a friend.

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    4 hours south of HankT, ,
    Posts
    5,121

    Post imported post

    Wooley wrote:
    Just think, if I had hung out near the jail I could have saved at least one of them from charges!:shock:
    I've heard of taking one for the team, but dude, better you than me....

  18. #18
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7,607

    Post imported post

    Tomahawk wrote:
    Wooley wrote:
    Just think, if I had hung out near the jail I could have saved at least one of them from charges!:shock:
    I've heard of taking one for the team, but dude, better you than me....
    He's taking one for the team... YAYYY!!!




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •