WhiteFeather
Regular Member
imported post
My personal beliefs are that of support for the mods. They have undertaken a risk in becoming an authority on an otherwise free market of ideas. Their goals should be to police up posts that cross the fine line of sanity and gross insult of persons. How does one do this when they risk "sensorship" and "violation of rights"PM'sbeing lashed at them by the keyboards of thousands of parishioners of the first church of the 1A. I have asked before how people draw the line in civil discussion and thread quagmire. These people are forced to make that decision. Some do it well others not so.
I do have a few requests on the matter.
1. If I cross a line at least make me aware of it.
2. Warnings before deletion make for much appriciation on the OP's part.
3. Punish those who commit said crime not everyone on the thread.
My personal beliefs are that of support for the mods. They have undertaken a risk in becoming an authority on an otherwise free market of ideas. Their goals should be to police up posts that cross the fine line of sanity and gross insult of persons. How does one do this when they risk "sensorship" and "violation of rights"PM'sbeing lashed at them by the keyboards of thousands of parishioners of the first church of the 1A. I have asked before how people draw the line in civil discussion and thread quagmire. These people are forced to make that decision. Some do it well others not so.
I do have a few requests on the matter.
1. If I cross a line at least make me aware of it.
2. Warnings before deletion make for much appriciation on the OP's part.
3. Punish those who commit said crime not everyone on the thread.
