Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: NATO doctrine applies, time for some phone calls to out of control VA Dems attacking gun rights!

  1. #1
    Moderator / Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    8,711

    Post imported post

    "An attack on one gun owner is an attack on all gun owners."

    And it don't matter if ye'r livn' in Oklahomee neither.

    Time to light up their phone banks with complaints about anti-gun ads which lament, in part, gun rights reforms signed by, get this, DEMOCRAT Governors Kaine and Warner!!

    ---

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    VCDL's Gun Dealer Legal Defense Fund -- help fight Mayor Bloomberg's
    scheme to cripple Virginia firearms dealers. See:
    www.vcdl.org/index.html#DefenseFund
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    VCDL's meeting schedule: http://www.vcdl.org/meetings.html
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------


    Once the last alert went out on the distortions and
    misrepresentations about Senator Ken Cuccinelli's gun voting record
    in a mailer paid for by the Democrat Party, I have received a variety
    of emails from other districts with similar complaints.

    For example, Faisal Gill has been victimized by a similar twisted attack.

    The cover shows a Glock laying by a martini glass with the wording,
    "Faisal Gill won't even bar guns from bars..."

    Here we go again. The issue is NOT about carrying a gun in a bar or
    drinking while carrying a gun. It IS about carrying in restaurants
    while enjoying a meal. And the Democrat leadership should darn well
    know it. They should be ashamed of themselves.

    The ad goes on: "... or libraries ...or government buildings ...or
    day care centers"

    And, again, the bills to infringe on our rights in those areas have
    been killed by a **bipartisan** vote.

    Can you spell "hypocrite?"

    Again, the mailer offers NO position to any of these items by Gill's
    challenger.

    Jeff Frederick has been similarly attacked.

    ** ACTION ITEM **

    Let's **flood** the phone lines of the candidates who endorsed these
    misleading mailers! Firmly, **but politely,** tell the person who
    answers the phone:

    * not to distort or misrepresent any candidate's positions on firearms.
    * not to distort or misrepresent firearms issues.
    * repealing the restaurant ban is not about drinking in bars, but
    carrying concealed while eating a meal.
    * the pro-gun votes mentioned in the mailers were supported by
    Democrats as well.

    Finally, ask that the candidate take a public position on firearm
    issues, instead of hiding behind negative and misleading attacks, and
    to return VCDL's Candidate Survey ASAP.

    Here is the opponents' contact information:

    For Ken Cuccinelli, his opponent in the 37th Senate District (Fairfax
    area) is Janet S. Oleszek. 703-426-4966

    For Faisal Gill, his opponent in the 51st House District (Woodbridge
    area) is Paul F. Nichols: 703-492-4205

    For Jeff Frederick, his opponent in the 52nd House District
    (Woodbridge area) is Christopher K. Brown: 703-895-4031

    For the Governor, you can send a message using his web page:

    http://www.governor.virginia.gov/Abo...ctGovernor.cfm

    -------------------------------------------
    ************************************************** *************************
    VA-ALERT is a project of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, Inc.
    (VCDL). VCDL is an all-volunteer, non-partisan grassroots organization
    dedicated to defending the human rights of all Virginians. The Right to
    Keep and Bear Arms is a fundamental human right.

    VCDL web page: http://www.vcdl.org
    ************************************************** *************************

  2. #2
    Regular Member Thundar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Newport News, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    4,961

    Post imported post

    What is the NATO Doctrine?

    The North Atlantic Treaty
    Washington D.C. - 4 April 1949
    Article 5
    The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all .....



    When applied to 2A rights enthusiasts this means that we all stand together against gun grabbers. It does not matter what part of the 2A they try to chip away at, handguns, shotguns, black powder, etc. we oppose all 2A infringement. For example: if the gun grabbers try to restrict shotgun hunting rights we all oppose it, even if we don't own any shotguns and have never duck hunted in our lives. An attack upon any part of the 2A is an attack upon all of the 2A




    He wore his gun outside his pants for all the honest world to see. Pancho & Lefty

    The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us....There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! ...The war is inevitable–and let it come! I repeat it, Sir, let it come …………. PATRICK HENRY speech 1776

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    , Virginia, USA
    Posts
    227

    Post imported post

    I did my part. Hopefully, the identified candidates and the governor will hear from many more.

  4. #4
    Moderator / Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    8,711

    Post imported post

    Thundar wrote:
    What is the NATO Doctrine?

    The North Atlantic Treaty
    Washington D.C. - 4 April 1949
    Article 5
    The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all .....



    When applied to 2A rights enthusiasts this means that we all stand together against gun grabbers. It does not matter what part of the 2A they try to chip away at, handguns, shotguns, black powder, etc. we oppose all 2A infringement. For example: if the gun grabbers try to restrict shotgun hunting rights we all oppose it, even if we don't own any shotguns and have never duck hunted in our lives. An attack upon any part of the 2A is an attack upon all of the 2A
    That's right - I have not hunted since I was a kid with my Dad, but I support hunters' rights to own and use guns. And I don't live in Ken's district but that does not matter neither as I support Ken and his support for the Second Amendment - we can exploit interior lines like Frederick the Great, and we can rally to move Virginia foreward!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •