imperialism2024
Regular Member
imported post
Doug Huffman wrote:
Oh wait, it's not analogous, because a store owner is subject to the Law of the People while the "L"EO in question is subject to the Law of the Police.
What would be even more interesting is what would have happened if one of the passengers of the target vehicle would have shot back at the "L"EO after said "L"EO opened fire...
:cuss::banghead:
Doug Huffman wrote:
Well, media, I believe that it is more analogous to a store owner who, after seeing a person spit on the sidewalk in front of his store, runs out of the store while yelling about how he's gonna kill some "nigger" and then proceeds to start firing into the crowd of people on the sidewalk when one of them "points his finger in a firing motion."Still, prosecutors said there was evidence that Officer Sawyer was possibly justified when he fired at the Honda. Officials said that idea was reinforced by the account of a passenger in Mr. Tirado’s car, Jason Batista, 21, who has said in interviews that after Officer Sawyer’s threat, Mr. Tirado hinted that he had a gun, and even pointed his finger in a firing motion.
Prosecutors said it was not unusual to delay charges in a homicide case, especially if there was a claim that the shooting was justified. One hypothetical example, officials said, would be when a store owner shoots a robber.
Oh wait, it's not analogous, because a store owner is subject to the Law of the People while the "L"EO in question is subject to the Law of the Police.
What would be even more interesting is what would have happened if one of the passengers of the target vehicle would have shot back at the "L"EO after said "L"EO opened fire...
:cuss::banghead: