• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

O' Canada!

cato

Newbie
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
2,338
Location
California, USA
imported post

Thundar wrote:
His challenge tothe Canadian firearms Actbased uponhis Constitutional and Charter Rightshas been decided. He lost.Not a surprise, but a disappointment.



http://www.brucemontague.ca/html/0277.html




[align=left]
November 6, 2007 [/align]
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Today's ruling acknowledges the right to firearms ownership, but then defers to parliament's history of infringing on our fundamental right to possess effective tools for the defense of human life. While we disagree with the ruling on the whole, this constitutional right will be the focus of the next stage of the Firearms Act challenge.

In the process of appealing to the supreme court of Canada, this decision is a relatively small setback. In fact it gives the Montagues a strong basis to refocus and represent arguments for consideration by the higher court.

Besides our appeal to Canada's constitutional heritage, we will emphasize the common-law basis for self-defense, and highlight the glaring ineffectiveness and pitfalls of the Firearms Act. As intended from the beginning, our next goal is to have portions of the Act struck down by the Ontario Court of Appeal.

The biggest loss in today's ruling is that Bruce and Donna will now be going into the criminal trial on Nov 13, 2007 with the crown seeking the full penalties of the current harsh, complex, and unreasonable sections of the criminal code which are enabled by the Firearms Act.

For more information visit http://www.BruceMontague.ca or contact (807) 937-2197.




If you Slaves want to have guns in Canada join the Royal Canadian Rifles:banghead:
 

Attachments

  • 800-Dsc_0619.jpg
    800-Dsc_0619.jpg
    65.4 KB · Views: 114

imperialism2024

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
3,047
Location
Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, USA
imported post

Legba wrote:
It's already happening here, the misapplication of forfeiture laws, etc. What was designed to be a tool against organized crime is being applied to "Johns" picking up hookers, DUI cases... any and every criminal charge where money and property can be taken. It is an outrage.

-ljp
But... but... you have nothing to fear if you don't do anything wrong.

One-way flights to Pakistan running about $2100... :celebrate
 

bourneshooter

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
343
Location
, Nevada, USA
imported post

imperialism2024 wrote:
Legba wrote:
It's already happening here, the misapplication of forfeiture laws, etc. What was designed to be a tool against organized crime is being applied to "Johns" picking up hookers, DUI cases... any and every criminal charge where money and property can be taken. It is an outrage.

-ljp
But... but... you have nothing to fear if you don't do anything wrong.

One-way flights to Pakistan running about $2100... :celebrate

I think I have seen this movie... V for Vendetta?

Or maybe Patriot Act staring the federal government coming soon to a "state of emergency" near you!

Needless to say the Pakistan example is another reason why the Patriot Act needs to be pulled off the books.

RON PAUL 2008!
 

Attachments

  • n40702451_30860318_8070.jpg
    n40702451_30860318_8070.jpg
    48.3 KB · Views: 113
Top