Tomahawk
Regular Member
imported post
LEO 229 wrote:
LEO 229 wrote:
I see it the other way around: the background check at the FFL is a circumvention of the Constitution. Just my 2¢PavePusher wrote:LEO 229 wrote:
Private sales DO circumvent this check that the FFL dealers do.
Actually, since there is no requirement, by definition there is no circumvention. Circumvention implies that one is avoiding something. That is not the case here, as there is nothing to avoid.
I wouldsay that a private seller has a moral duty to attempt to ensure the sale isnot to a personintent on causing harm.But I don'trecall a specific legal requirement todo so. 'Course,the sellermight be held legally liable for any ensuing consequences...Maybe I can clarify by saying..... A felon or person subject to a restriction can get around the checks in place to buy a gun if they go for the private sale.SNIP.....
I don't want to sound like I'm attacking you, just felt you had some errors that needed clarification. I might be wrong. :?
Personally.. I would NEVER sell to someone I did not know personally and would have to check the record of those I do not know.
I would really hate to know that I sold a gun to a "bag guy."