imported post
Its full text is not yet available; this was introduced in the House of Representatives yesterday:
I'm certain there would be those who felt intimidated, and while a gun isn't, the ammunition would be "explosives" on school property.
Further, enhanced penalties for threats could make "zero tolerance" policies even more ludicrous (if that is possible).
Its full text is not yet available; this was introduced in the House of Representatives yesterday:
Anybody else see this as another attempt to regulate, at the federal level, guns on school property?By Mrs. LOWEY:
H.R. 4163. A bill to provide an enhanced penalty for threatening to kill, injure, or intimidate an individual, or to cause property damage, by means of fire or an explosive on school property; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
I'm certain there would be those who felt intimidated, and while a gun isn't, the ammunition would be "explosives" on school property.
Further, enhanced penalties for threats could make "zero tolerance" policies even more ludicrous (if that is possible).