Agent 47
Regular Member
imported post
.45lovinchick wrote:
.45lovinchick wrote:
Who the hell do you think you are talking to?!?! When did I ever say unarmed security is useless? Maybe you are the one who should "clarify the points before posting them." Just to clarify, The conversation was between me and him, I didn't see you anywhere near there. So where do you get off telling me what his true feelings on the subject are? The fact of the matter is he said, and I quote, "The higher-ups are meeting with the Lynwood chief of police today to see what we can legally do to prevent people from open carrying in the mall. With the Christmas season coming up we don't want people like that scarring the customers." You will notice he used the collective term "we" as to include himself as being amongst those who would seek to end the practice of open carry in the mall. If mall security was "a little confused, thinking he was a off duty officer or something" Why in the hell would they call 911?! they called 911 on the man because they are grossly ignorant of the law and they waisted the responding officers time. I can forgive the mistake of an idiot mall ninja but when the police educated them an the facts and reprimanded them for waisting their time the mall ninjas decide they don't care if it is legal they are going to go out of their way to make sure the public doesn't get to enjoy that particular freedom on their watch.So Mr. Sams Gunshop employee I don't think that your friend the mall ninja would have said it like that. Does he like guns? As for the policy on not confronting people with weapons because of being unarmed security, do you think that prevented him from wanting to make contact with the gentleman? I have worked security for 8 years and I understand having to follow policy regardless of your personal feelings on a subject. When you wrote about the mall having a meeting with the police are you sure he said the goal was to prevent OC"ing? It could been about finding an understanding between policy and law and not infringing on peoples rights. I'm all for the legal right of open carrying, but can you see how it might make some people who are not educated on the subject a little nervous? The mall had what some 30,000 people there on friday? As for a beeline for the police, if mall security was not educated on the law of open carry don't you think they were a little confused. Thinking maybe he was an off duty officer or something? I can't help but be a little offended about the comment on unarmed security being useless. I worked as a security officer for years and with some companies all there is is unarmed security. Are you saying there is no need for it? As for changing the topic when you mentioned you were an OCer maybe he didn't want to offend you, he was probably still surpirsed about the law, and may have said a comment on it that he didn't want you to take wrong. Like I said I am an OCer myself (you should see the looks you get wearing a tank top with nice tits and a .45) but I think you may have taken his conversation out of context. And if he is your friend why don't you clarify the points with him before posting them. :celebrate