Question: would you rather kill yourself or vote for Romney?

Unless you live in a Primary-holding state, you won't even get a chance to vote for Ron Paul, so this is all a moot point. Unless, of course, you want to vote for him as a write-in, in which case you might as well write in your own name, as you and he will at that point have an equal chance of becoming President. (Actually, at this point, you and he have an equal chance of becoming President.)

In the General Election, you will have three choices:

1. Vote for the Republican candidate, whoever (whomever? I still don't know) that is.

2. Vote for Hillary.

3. Not vote/vote for Ron Paul/Daffy Duck/Capt Kirk, etc., all of which are the exactly the sameas Number 2 above.

Click to expand...

ScottNH wrote:

Unless you live in a Primary-holding state, you won't even get a chance to vote for Ron Paul, so this is all a moot point. Unless, of course, you want to vote for him as a write-in, in which case you might as well write in your own name, as you and he will at that point have an equal chance of becoming President. (Actually, at this point, you and he have an equal chance of becoming President.)

In the General Election, you will have three choices:

1. Vote for the Republican candidate, whoever (whomever? I still don't know) that is.

2. Vote for Hillary.

3. Not vote/vote for Ron Paul/Daffy Duck/Capt Kirk, etc., all of which are the exactly the sameas Number 2 above.

Click to expand...

Well said.





Tarzan

Click to expand...

ScottNH wrote:

Unless you live in a Primary-holding state, you won't even get a chance to vote for Ron Paul, so this is all a moot point. Unless, of course, you want to vote for him as a write-in, in which case you might as well write in your own name, as you and he will at that point have an equal chance of becoming President. (Actually, at this point, you and he have an equal chance of becoming President.)

In the General Election, you will have three choices:

1. Vote for the Republican candidate, whoever (whomever? I still don't know) that is.

2. Vote for Hillary.

3. Not vote/vote for Ron Paul/Daffy Duck/Capt Kirk, etc., all of which are the exactly the sameas Number 2 above.

Click to expand...

If Romney or Giuliani get the nod - and it looks like they will - It'll be #3. If I'm going to have a president that supports big government policies, I'd at least like to not have "conservatives" blamed for their failure, as has happened with Bush.

I have a 50/50 chance of voting #1 if it's Huckabee.

The only top-tier Republicans I'd support in the general are Thompson and Ron Paul. I'm mad as hell at this Republican party and I'm not giving them another vote until they shape up. Less of two evils be damned. They didn't deserve my vote in 2006, and they deserve it even less now than they did then.

Click to expand...

"The "conspiracy" of the Federal Reserve"

I don't see where's the conspiracy!! It's not a conspiracy. It's plain right in YOUR FACE!!! The Federal Reserve is neither "Federal" or a "Reserve". Ron Paul, just like many other intelligent people, maybe 2 or 3% of the entire population KNOW that the Federal Reserve is A PRIVATELY OWNED CORPORATION. It was introduced in 1913 byMax Warburg, an International banker and signed into law by Woodrow Wilson. There's a reason why the "Fed" isn't in the Blue Pages and is right next to Federal Express. Now if telling the truth makes me a conspiracy nut, well, then so be it. But the fact still remains that the Federal Reserve is one big scam. The IRS is a component of the Fed, therfore Ron Paul knows that it too is Bullsh*t! Will he win?? Certainly not! And if by some miracle he does, I hope he has a lot of life insurance.

Fact: Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Jackson, James Garfield and John F. Kennedy ALL try to take on the "Fed" and we all know what happened to them. Andrew Jackson survived the assasination attempt due to a mis-fire. Look it up! Abraham Lincoln stripped the power away from the "International Bankers" by creating what was known as "Green Backs". JFK created executive order 11110, rendering the "Fed" powerless to charge interest and James Garfield did something similar. But I know that these assasinations and attemted assasination are just crocked up conspiracy theories.

Well, time to put on my tin foil hat and head back to the mother ship. Feel better now?? :celebrate



Jersey

Click to expand...

ama-gi wrote:

ScottNH wrote:

Unless you live in a Primary-holding state, you won't even get a chance to vote for Ron Paul, so this is all a moot point. Unless, of course, you want to vote for him as a write-in, in which case you might as well write in your own name, as you and he will at that point have an equal chance of becoming President. (Actually, at this point, you and he have an equal chance of becoming President.)

In the General Election, you will have three choices:

1. Vote for the Republican candidate, whoever (whomever? I still don't know) that is.

2. Vote for Hillary.

3. Not vote/vote for Ron Paul/Daffy Duck/Capt Kirk, etc., all of which are the exactly the sameas Number 2 above.

Click to expand...

If Romney or Giuliani get the nod - and it looks like they will - It'll be #3. If I'm going to have a president that supports big government policies, I'd at least like to not have "conservatives" blamed for their failure, as has happened with Bush.

I have a 50/50 chance of voting #1 if it's Huckabee.

The only top-tier Republicans I'd support in the general are Thompson and Ron Paul. I'm mad as hell at this Republican party and I'm not giving them another vote until they shape up. Less of two evils be damned. They didn't deserve my vote in 2006, and they deserve it even less now than they did then.

Click to expand...

Well, that's certainly your right, but I thinkif that's the case, then you should run out and put a big "Hillary" sign in your front lawn, because that makes you every bit as much a Hillary supporter as Huma Abedin.

I guess that's easier for you to reconcile than a vote for Romney. :?

Click to expand...

Jersey Ron wrote:

"The "conspiracy" of the Federal Reserve"

I don't see where's the conspiracy!! It's not a conspiracy. It's plain right in YOUR FACE!!! The Federal Reserve is neither "Federal" or a "Reserve". Ron Paul, just like many other intelligent people, maybe 2 or 3% of the entire population KNOW that the Federal Reserve is A PRIVATELY OWNED CORPORATION. It was introduced in 1913 byMax Warburg, an International banker and signed into law by Woodrow Wilson. There's a reason why the "Fed" isn't in the Blue Pages and is right next to Federal Express. Now if telling the truth makes me a conspiracy nut, well, then so be it. But the fact still remains that the Federal Reserve is one big scam. The IRS is a component of the Fed, therfore Ron Paul knows that it too is Bullsh*t! Will he win?? Certainly not! And if by some miracle he does, I hope he has a lot of life insurance.

Fact: Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Jackson, James Garfield and John F. Kennedy ALL try to take on the "Fed" and we all know what happened to them. Andrew Jackson survived the assasination attempt due to a mis-fire. Look it up! Abraham Lincoln stripped the power away from the "International Bankers" by creating what was known as "Green Backs". JFK created executive order 11110, rendering the "Fed" powerless to charge interest and James Garfield did something similar. But I know that these assasinations and attemted assasination are just crocked up conspiracy theories.

Well, time to put on my tin foil hat and head back to the mother ship. Feel better now?? :celebrate



Jersey

Click to expand...

Whew! I'm not sure if this is an argument for Ron Paul being a nut-case, or one against it.

Click to expand...

Well, that's certainly your right, but I thinkif that's the case, then you should run out and put a big "Hillary" sign in your front lawn, because that makes you every bit as much a Hillary supporter as Huma Abedin.

I guess that's easier for you to reconcile than a vote for Romney. :?

Click to expand...

ScottNH wrote:

Well, that's certainly your right, but I thinkif that's the case, then you should run out and put a big "Hillary" sign in your front lawn, because that makes you every bit as much a Hillary supporter as Huma Abedin.

I guess that's easier for you to reconcile than a vote for Romney. :?

Click to expand...

Maybe so. It makes barely any difference as far as I can tell. Bush has spent more money than Clinton ever did, and given us the largest increase in the welfare state...in addition to an unnecessary war. I doubt Hillary would be worse than Romney or Bush.

And yes, I'd rather have Hillary than Romney. At least I know what I'm getting with Hillary and I, as a Republican, don't have to be responsible for Hillary.

Since Republican bots are too busy congratulating each other about being "great Americans" that they don't seem to get that they lost 2006 becausea large part of their base left the party, maybe they'll get it after they lose 2008. Once they figure it out, maybe the Republican party will go back to its roots and I'll have a choice again since the Republicans and Dems will actually be somewhat different. If not, it makes no difference who I vote for, since nothing changes no matter who wins.

I'd rather lose one election than lose the entire conservative movement...if it's not already too late.

Click to expand...

There is none so blind..............

Click to expand...