unrequited
Regular Member
imported post
...quick enough
http://www.statesman.com/news/mplayer/other/32386
Holy crap. Ho-ly crap.
(I guess it happened a year ago, a friend just sent it to me today because they just cleared him of all wrongdoing)
I was confusing two separate news stories... this guy got suspended for 3 days. A civil suit is pending and he's sure to win.
http://www.ci.austin.tx.us/opm/downloads/TempSus_OConnor_06-635.pdf
further citing in the suspension order as to what he specifically did wrong:
There is justice... or at least professional review.
correct news link:
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/09/30/0930video.html
...quick enough
http://www.statesman.com/news/mplayer/other/32386
Holy crap. Ho-ly crap.
(I guess it happened a year ago, a friend just sent it to me today because they just cleared him of all wrongdoing)
I was confusing two separate news stories... this guy got suspended for 3 days. A civil suit is pending and he's sure to win.
http://www.ci.austin.tx.us/opm/downloads/TempSus_OConnor_06-635.pdf
"Officer O'Conner did not display an attitude consistent with Department policy and did not comply with the Department's policy regarding the use of his taser."
further citing in the suspension order as to what he specifically did wrong:
Unacceptable uses are: d. To overcome passive resistance (passive resistance means a subject offers no physical resistance to arrest, simply goes limp, and makes no overt act of aggressive behavior underline not mine as in demonstrations, e.g abortion rallies). The weapon is not designed for use as, nor will it be used as, a prod to get a suspect or prisoner to move in these types of situations.
There is justice... or at least professional review.
correct news link:
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/09/30/0930video.html