• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Open Carry In a Mall

Sage of Seattle

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
164
Location
Boise, Idaho, , USA
imported post

Personally any time I strap on a sidearm and it's openly carried I think it makes me a bigger target than a concealed weapon.

Let me guess... you're not in a wheelchair or are a seventy seven year old man with a cane, are you? What makes you think that all of the physically fit, alert, strong men wouldn't be taken down first anyway, simply because, armed or not, they're still the most able of all victims to resist?

And, I'm not making this personal, Mjolnir, so please don't misunderstand. You just raised these questions for me, is all.
 

Beau

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
672
Location
East of Aurora, Colorado, USA
imported post

Mjolnir wrote:
Beau wrote:
If a person was oc'ing I doubt he would have noticed when he started firing. He was looking for targets not guns on belts.
Don't you think a sidearm out in the open makes you a target??

Personally any time I strap on a sidearm and it's openly carried I think it makes me a bigger target than a concealed weapon.

I absolutely do not think OC'ing makes you a bigger target.

Think about it. How many robbers or muggers, rapists etc.. do youthink plan on committing murder when they commit a crime? I think at least 90% of criminals want to get in, get whatever they came for and get out. Not start a shootout. So if they were to see someone openly carrying it's most likely that they will turn around and head the other way. Find an easier target.

Now I'm not saying that being made a target simply by OC'ing is not possible. Just not likely.

As for the situation of being in the presence of a mass shooting I think it highly unlikely to be targeted for OC'ing. A person who opens fire in public may be checking for threats but I doubt they would notice the average person with a gun on their hip. Most people don't notice under normal circumstances. If anything they are looking for uniforms and badges. Something easily detectable.
 

deepdiver

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
5,820
Location
Southeast, Missouri, USA
imported post

I think any disadvantage of OC, over time and across possible scenarios, balances out with the deterent factor in other possible scenarios. As I have stated before, I think that there are times that CC is more appropriate/advantageous than OC and vise versa, and times the choice is neutral.

I do not think that in a mass shooting situation that it is likely that OC v CC is going to make a difference generally speaking, although specifics of a certain situation may dictate a preference. I do think that there is a likelihood that an armed citizen in many of the mass shooting situations of the last decade would have mitigated casualties.
 

exgabrit

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
178
Location
Alpharetta, Georgia, USA
imported post

i think that is correct. any gunman is going to be focused too much on the following events to notice someone OCing nearby. in a mall there is a lot of cover to obscure a firearm openly carried. plus a CC firearm is OC shortly thereafter.
whether concealed or open, a member of the public carrying a firearm should be able to make a difference.
 
Top