Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Guardsman guilty of illegally transferring 'machine gun' after firearm malfunctions

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    , Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    44

    Post imported post

    I know this isn't "open carry" precisely, but think it's important enough to be in the news thread.

    Some of you may be following the thread of this guy on AR15.com
    Hehas now been convicted.

    http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.htm...483&page=1






    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A drill instructor in the National Guard has been convicted in a Wisconsin federal court of illegally transferring a machine gun after a rifle he loaned to a student malfunctioned, setting off three shots before jamming.
    The verdict of guilty on one count in the case against David Olofson was confirmed yesterday by the http://www.wied.uscourts.gov/generalinfo.htm clerks office in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

    That means now that anyone whose weapon malfunctions is subject to charges of having or handling a banned gun, according to an expert witness who reports that the particular problem is a well-known malfunction and was even the subject of a recall from the manufacturer.


    "If your semiautomatic rifle breaks or malfunctions you are now subject to prosecution. That is now a sad FACT. I guess we know now what Sen. Kennedy meant when he said he looked forward to working with [Acting Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Director] Mike Sullivan on Gun control issues, after his committee approved him for full Senate vote," Len Savage, a weaponry expert who runs Historic Arms LLC, said in a blog.

    "To those in the sporting culture who have derided 'black guns' and so-called 'assault weapons'; Your double barreled shotgun is now next up to be seized and you could possibly be prosecuted if the ATF can get it to 'fire more than once,'" he wrote in http://redstradingpost.blogspot.com/2008/01/len-savage-duck-hunters-and-sportsman.html] a blog run by Red's Trading Post.


    "Hey, but don't worry," Savage said. "The people testing it have no procedures in writing and the testing will be in secret. Also if you know of information that proves YOUR innocence, maybe the ATF won't claim that it's tax information at your trial and prevent YOUR judge from viewing it."

    He told in an http://www.jpfo.org/media-sound/len-savage-01-10-08.mp3] interview with Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership that Olofson had been instructing a man in the use of guns, and the student asked to borrow a rifle for some shooting practice.

    "Mr. Olofson was nice enough to accommodate him," Savage said. So the student, Robert Kiernicki, went to a range and fired about 120 rounds. "He went to put in another magazine and the rifle shot three times, then jammed," Savage said.
    A couple of police officers who also were at the ranged immediately approached him and started asking questions about the "automatic" fire, and he told them it was a borrowed weapon.

    "Mr. Olofson, being a responsible person, went down to the police station and said, 'I'm in the National Guard. I know what a machine gun looks like. That's not it,'" Savage said.

    But instead of having the issues resolve, Savage said, it got worse.

    He reported that because of the malfunction, the rifle was seized and sent to the Firearm Technology Branch, the testing arm of the federal agency.

    "The examined and test fired the rifle; then declared it to be 'just a rifle,'" Savage said. "You would think it would all be resolved at this point, this was merely the beginning."

    He said the Special Agent in Charge, Jody Keeku, asked for a re-test and specified that the tests use "soft primered commercial ammunition."

    "FTB has no standardized testing procedures, in fact it has no written procedures at all for testing firearms," Savage said. "They had no standard to stick to, and gleefully tried again. The results this time...'a machinegun.' ATF with a self-admitted 50 percent error rate pursued an indictment and Mr. Olofson was charged with 'Unlawful transfer of a machinegun.'. Not possession, not even Robert Kiernicki was charged with possession (who actually possessed the rifle), though the ATF paid Mr. Kiernicki 'an undisclosed amount of money' to testify against Mr. Olofson at trial," Savage said.

    And then during the trial, the prosecution told the judge it would not provide some information defense lawyers felt would clear their client, Savage continued. That included the fact that the rifle's manufacturer, Olympic Arms, had been issued a recall notice for that very model in 1986 over an issue of guns inadvertently slipping into full automatic mode, if certain parts were worn or if certain ammunition was used.

    Ryan Horsley, who posts the http://www.redstradingpost.com] Red's Trading Post blog, said the results were "very concerning."

    "Basically if your Ruger 10/22, Browning Citori Over and Under or Remington 11-87 malfunction and fire more than one round at a time; the ATF will now consider it a machine gun," he wrote.

    He told WND he's had personal experience with guns that malfunction and fire more than one bullet. Even double-barreled shotguns, if both shells would be released at once, now could be considered machine guns and illegal, he said.
    "This precedent is very dangerous," he said.

    Defense attorneys in the Olofson case couldn't be reached immediately to determine whether an appeal would be pursued, but Savage noted the arguments by assistant U.S. Attorney Greg Hannstad, who handled the prosecution.

    "Haanstad claimed the law does not exempt a malfunction. He claims that it states 'any weapon that shoots more than once without manual reloading, per function of the trigger is a machinegun.' To clarify when I was on the stand, I asked him, 'Are you saying if I take my Great Granddaddy's double barrel out and I pull one trigger and both barrels go off, it's a machinegun?' He went back to … 'any weapon that shoots…'" Savage said.

    On the Red's blog, commenters were incensed.

    "'Innocent until proven guilty' has been transformed by the ATF into 'guilty until framed,' said LibertyPlease.

    Horsley also told WND the 2008 edition of Firearms Law Deskbook quotes from a 1999 case in which the court concluded the law on automatic weapons "is not intended to trap the unwary innocent, and well intentioned citizen who possess an otherwise semi-automatic weapon that, by repeated use of the weapon, by the inevitable wear and tear of sporting activities, or by means of mere inattention, happenstance, or illfortune, fires more than semi-automatically."


  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Clayton, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    228

    Post imported post

    I just went to the Ar-15 site and read the entire thread and posted search warrant and federal LEO documents. The accused didn't just loan out a AR-15 that malfunctioned. He loaned out an illegallymodified ar-15. He was buying rifles , modifying to fire in three shot burst. The modified weapon had three positions, safe, fire and unmarked. When in the unmarked position it would fire in three round burst with a single pull of the trigger. That is an illegal conversion to enable automatic fire.

    The gentleman caught with the weapon was at a conservationand was reported for shooting a automatic weapon. He admitted to having "ordered " one of the converted weapons from the accused and was shooting a loaner until his converted rifle came in. He fired the weapon twice on the three shot burst setting before it malfunctioned. The weapon was seized and led to substantial charges against the accused and now a conviction.

    Here is the real point of the whole situation from my perspective:

    The accused posted that the Feds hadbeen electronically monitoring his computer communications. They had defeated his security and fire wall systems resulting in a slowed system and constantly being kicked of the INTERNET. He found himself quite impressed with the governments ability to breach his advanced computer security. Not good for freedom. Sooner or latter this will be used against citizens to monitor their INTERNET activities. We need to be careful what we say on the INTERNET, and on sites like this that are obviously monitored by law enforcement.

    No one needs to get caught up in something over a misinterpreted comment being used to get a search warrant or electronic monitoring (T3) focused on them.

    In this case the accused was dealing in firearms illegally. Converting weapons to fire more than once per pull of the trigger. Fine he violated the law and was arrested and successfully prosecuted. Whether I agree with government controls on automatic weapons is irrelevant( I find all six Federal gun control Acts to be Unconstitional myself ) , this guy was not a "victim". He is a criminal according to our laws. Law enforcement did their job and the system worked.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    9,193

    Post imported post

    Mod LW, perhaps these threads could be merged, http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum4/7403.html

  4. #4
    Campaign Veteran deepdiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Southeast, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    5,974

    Post imported post

    If what Jack posted above is correct I'm not getting real excited about this.
    Bob Owens @ Bearing Arms (paraphrased): "These people aren't against violence; they're very much in favor of violence. They're against armed resistance."

  5. #5
    Activist Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Reno, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    1,713

    Post imported post

    Well, if it really was a drill instructor giving it to a student, even if it was an illegal full auto, there is an argument against the ban on fully automatics. Shouldn't members of the armed forces be able to train while they are off duty with a gun that operates in the same way as the ones they are issued?

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Clayton, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    228

    Post imported post

    Felid`Maximus wrote:
    Well, if it really was a drill instructor giving it to a student, even if it was an illegal full auto, there is an argument against the ban on fully automatics. Shouldn't members of the armed forces be able to train while they are off duty with a gun that operates in the same way as the ones they are issued?
    They can and some do. You just can't illegally convert a semi auto to a machine gun.

    If you click through and read the AR-15 board thread and all the law enforcement reports you will see this is not an Innocent victim of Government agents harassing a lawful gun owner.

    Do I agree with Any federal gun law, nope but I would expect to be arrested if caught doing what this gentleman did.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    34

    Post imported post

    TN law says that "more than two rounds per trigger pull" is a machine gun. Interesting how states and federal laws differ.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Clayton, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    228

    Post imported post

    That is weird, but the Feds can prosecute you under the the 1934 Federal Firearms Act. Serious prison time.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    34

    Post imported post

    Don't they always have some excuse?:?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •