• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Legislature Back In Session, Here We Go... New Gun Laws

XD45PlusP

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2007
Messages
250
Location
, ,
imported post

We've gotta participate, and send letters, emails, and testify in committee hearings. Don't let this slide people.....

SB 6304:

Allowing institutions of higher education to adopt rules regulating firearms on campus. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=6304&year=2008

HB 1026 :

Regulating the sale of firearms at gun shows and events.
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=1026&year=2008

HB 1014:

Encouraging safe storage of firearms. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=1014&year=2008

I am soooooo sick of this "Nanny State" mentality. :banghead::cuss:
 

heresolong

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
1,318
Location
Blaine, WA, ,
imported post

6304 is a little odd. The legislature has already given that authority to the universities by allowing them to write their own WACs. I wonder if they are worried about a court challenge under preemption.
 

thewise1

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
383
Location
Moscow, ID
imported post

Wrote my representatives about this, we'll see how they respond.

I just wrote them that I'm against the other 2, but for 6304 I wrote this:


Hello,

Please be advised that not only am I against senate bill 6304, I have to point out the sheer absurdity involved in a bill of this nature.

The bill suggests that the legislation has determined that new rules are necessary to regulate firearms on college campuses due to recent events. Did it ever occur to our legislature that the 'recent events' on college campuses involving illegal discharge of a firearm, harm to others, even deaths, were already illegal?

Banning guns only takes them away from law abiding citizens. As a voter, I didn't elect you folks to pass laws banning things in 6 different ways. Enforce the law as it exists now and stop trying to pass new laws every time a problem is encountered!

Best regards,
Andrew

Not that they will actually read my mail or anything, but at least I wrote.
 

heresolong

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
1,318
Location
Blaine, WA, ,
imported post

John Hardin wrote:
I don't know if it's too late to push these this year...

http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum55/6633.html

http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum55/3849.html

Let's get some legislation that leans our way in there, rather than just constantly fighting those who want to further infringe our rights have all the action!
We actually have over the past few years, but nothing ever gets done with it given the majority situation.

I asked my rep to write legislation requiring that the state send out a renewal notice for CPPs. He did and they didn't act on it because it was "firearms" legislation.
 

XD45PlusP

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2007
Messages
250
Location
, ,
imported post

Sent off some emails. I "Encourage" everyone to do this. We NEED to be on top of this. It's easy to send an email. Just click on the sponsors name on these bills, and it's all automated.

As an example, here are the sponsors of SB6304

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/memberemail/MailForm.aspx?Chamber=S&District=36

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/memberemail/MailForm.aspx?Chamber=S&District=21

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/memberemail/MailForm.aspx?Chamber=S&District=1

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/memberemail/MailForm.aspx?Chamber=S&District=32

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/memberemail/MailForm.aspx?Chamber=S&District=34

I also believe that when/if it gets into the committee, those legislators are more important in getting your voice to. So be on the lookout of the committees that will be hearing these bills. I will update, as well.....
 

joeroket

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
3,339
Location
Everett, Washington, USA
imported post

Here is my response.

Code:
I would like to voice my opinion against SB6304. SB6304 has supposedly been introduced to protect the citizens of Washington. The fact of the matter is that this bill may likely lead to disaster. In the WAC’s for almost every center for higher education there are items that restricts the carrying of a firearm by students. Presently the WAC’s do not prevent a non-student visiting the campuses from carrying a firearm. This bill will strip these people of their constitutionally preserved right to bear arms. I do understand that there may be a need for additional protection at college campuses but I truly do not believe that restricting firearms completely is the correct avenue for this. There has been a lot of discussion since the Virginia Tech tragedy about banning firearms on college campuses. Virginia had regulations banning firearm carrying during the time that this incident happened. The laws and regulations did nothing to stop the violence. Columbine is the same in the sense that the laws in place that restricted firearms on the school campus were meaningless to the perpetrators. It has been seen time and time again that legislation that prevents people from defending themselves only results in more deaths when an incident occurs. The only people that follow these types of legislation are lawful firearm owners. These people will abide by the laws that leave them vulnerable and defenseless to the people that disregard laws and human life.

 I strongly urge you to oppose SB6304 and urge you to enact bills that would truly help make our colleges a safer learning environment. Bills that would provide more funding to the college police departments and security departments or to offer free classes/seminars to teach staff and students how to spot these threats and take the appropriate actions before violence can occur, I think, would be a better starting point than to create laws that the criminals have already shown in the past that they will disregard.
 

Charles Paul Lincoln

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
222
Location
Seattle-ish, Washington, USA
imported post

That's a well-crafted reply that depicts those of us who choose to carry as rational and intelligent. Well done!

One of the issues that would have to be considered if higher ed institutions are allowed to ban firearms is that public thoroughfares transverse their properties. How are armed citizens supposed to use public roads that run through a campus? This is part of the reason for the exemptions in the Gun Free Schools Act, is to allow lawful possession as one passes through or has legitimate business on a K-12 campus.

On a related note, there is proposed legislation that will make posession of a firearm by a student on campus a Class C felony unless it is unloaded and locked in a vehicle (which would only be a Gross Misdemeanor). House bill 3905, I believe. As stated by joerocket in his letter, the existing laws don't work, so why do legislators think a new law will be any different? Possession of a handgun by a minor is already a Class C felony.

But, here's one more thing to consider . . . what happened to equal protection of the law? If 3905 became law, an 18 year old student (citizen) would be guilty of a crime if he had an unloaded rifle in his vehicle, but an 18 year old non-student would not be guilty of a crime. What happened to the level playing field that "all men are created equal?"

I'm for finding a legislator that will sponsor a bill to change the wording of RCW such that would pre-empt all cities, municipalies, and governmental sub-divisions from passing any law, code, or policy that is more restritive than state law on firearms. Our state constitution is clear that the right to self-defense shall not be infringed, which is exactly what the legislators are trying to do every time they restrict where we can carry.

By the way, 3905 would also make it a gross misdemeanor to possess a stun gun, Tazer, or pepper sprayon school property -- even in the parking lot. I predict they would arrest a lot of little old ladies at the Friday night football game if they did a purse check!
 

Nebulis01

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
113
Location
Snohomish, Washington, USA
imported post

joeroket wrote:
Here is my response.

Code:
I would like to voice my opinion against SB6304. SB6304 has supposedly been introduced to protect the citizens of Washington. The fact of the matter is that this bill may likely lead to disaster. In the WAC’s for almost every center for higher education there are items that restricts the carrying of a firearm by students. Presently the WAC’s do not prevent a non-student visiting the campuses from carrying a firearm. This bill will strip these people of their constitutionally preserved right to bear arms. I do understand that there may be a need for additional protection at college campuses but I truly do not believe that restricting firearms completely is the correct avenue for this. There has been a lot of discussion since the Virginia Tech tragedy about banning firearms on college campuses. Virginia had regulations banning firearm carrying during the time that this incident happened. The laws and regulations did nothing to stop the violence. Columbine is the same in the sense that the laws in place that restricted firearms on the school campus were meaningless to the perpetrators. It has been seen time and time again that legislation that prevents people from defending themselves only results in more deaths when an incident occurs. The only people that follow these types of legislation are lawful firearm owners. These people will abide by the laws that leave them vulnerable and defenseless to the people that disregard laws and human life.

 I strongly urge you to oppose SB6304 and urge you to enact bills that would truly help make our colleges a safer learning environment. Bills that would provide more funding to the college police departments and security departments or to offer free classes/seminars to teach staff and students how to spot these threats and take the appropriate actions before violence can occur, I think, would be a better starting point than to create laws that the criminals have already shown in the past that they will disregard.


Sent to my reps (District 1)
 

uncoolperson

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
608
Location
Bellingham, ,
imported post

XD45PlusP wrote:
I am soooooo sick of this "Nanny State" mentality.


what i've always found as funny (agree with it or not). is that these same people that want to "nerf' the world, are also pushing evolution (natural selection) on high school students.

you think darwin would like the idea of making everything safe to the lowest common denominator?
 

Right Wing Wacko

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Messages
645
Location
Marysville, Washington, USA
imported post

At this point it doeslittle good to write to your REP's to oppose Senate Bills, and no good to write to your State Senator to oppose House Bills. That time may come but it's not now. The goal is to kill the bills before they get that far.

At this point, when writingto support or opposesenate bills write to your State Senator, and when writing about House Bills write to your District Rep.

An exception to above is if you use the Web Form on the Legislatures web page. One advantage of using this form is that it tallies the responses in to oppose and support. That way you are at least tallied, even if they never read your email
 

John Hardin

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
683
Location
Snohomish, Washington, USA
imported post

Right Wing Wacko wrote:
At this point it doeslittle good to write to your REP's to oppose Senate Bills, and no good to write to your State Senator to oppose House Bills. That time may come but it's not now. The goal is to kill the bills before they get that far.

At this point, when writingto support or opposesenate bills write to your State Senator, and when writing about House Bills write to your District Rep.

An exception to above is if you use the Web Form on the Legislatures web page. One advantage of using this form is that it tallies the responses in to oppose and support. That way you are at least tallied, even if they never read your email
I always CC all of them, so that they all have visibility to the opinions of those they represent.

Thanks for the heads-up about the web form, I wasn't aware that they tallied those. We should all post comments there as well as writing/faxing letters.

Edited to add: RWW, can you post links to those pages so that we don't have to go hunting?
 

thewise1

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
383
Location
Moscow, ID
imported post

So I actually got a reply back from what appears to be a real legislator and not a staffer.

Here's what I wrote; I encourage feedback if I'm out of line. Yes, the formatting looks like crap here. Hopefully it's a bit more readable in the format I sent her.




Liz,

First, I want to express my thanks to you for your response and actual dialog. Even if we never end up seeing eye to eye on this, the fact that you actually bothered to ask for a suggestion instead of sending me a cut and paste response that completely ignores my concerns speaks volumes to me.
To address your question, you asked me for my thoughts on how we can reduce the number of accidental shootings each year, and I have taken what I believe to be a problem solving approach to offer a solution.
First, let's define the problem.
I did some research on the problem (1) and found that there were an average of 57.5 firearm deaths per year in Washington from 1999-2004, totaling 287. These tragic deaths were largely concentrated in the 15-19 year old age group as you can see if you use the CDC reporting tool.
The above report was run using the data for 0-19 year olds on all firearm related deaths. If you filter only on unintentional deaths, the number drops significantly (Homicide deaths account for 112 of those deaths, while suicides account for 149 of those deaths). The conclusion that I have drawn from this data is that when we refer to accidental shootings, the actual number is far smaller than some suggest, at a total of 17 accidental shootings over 5 years. Ultimately, that means there are 3.4 accidental shootings per year that result in the death of children.
While this is certainly tragic, the problem is clearly overstated to begin with.
The next problem with this legislation is that it assumes the accidental firearms related deaths were perpetrated by children. The CDC offers no statistics (at least, that I could find) on the age group of those who actually committed these accidental killings.

As a result, we have no conclusive evidence that I can find that any significant percentage of these killings were committed by a child. However, for the sake of discussion and common sense, I will admit that it's very likely that at least some of them were, simply because we all hear the occasional tragic story in the news about the little boy who killed his friend by playing with dad's .22 rifle or other such stories.
This bill attempts to give law enforcement the opportunity to bring irresponsible parents to justice by charging them with reckless endangerment or other such crimes if they do not store their firearms in a 'safe' manner. However, it will not prevent deaths, simply because enforcement of this bill from a prevention stance would require police to inspect firearm owners’ homes on a regular basis. I hope it's safe to say that this is a solution that none of us want!

I also submit that a firearms-owning parent who lacked the responsibility to teach their children the rules of firearms safety and instill a respect in their children for firearms will also be irresponsible enough to not secure their firearms anyway, whether there is a law or not, especially as it is unenforceable until after a tragic event occurs.
Now that I have made my case for why this bill will not lower firearms related deaths, I do have a potential solution for you to consider.
Why not teach firearms safety in schools? I was lucky enough personally that my father instilled a deep respect for firearms when I was 5 with a trip to the woods, a stern lecture on firearms safety, a lesson on how guns work, and an object lesson both in what a bullet does to its target, and also what it's like to shoot one. Obviously it doesn't need to be a trip to the woods in school, but a firearms safety class is hardly a bad idea nonetheless. I think it's pragmatic to assume that some parents will object to their children participating in such a class, and that's their choice, but such parents probably don't own firearms, so it's really not an issue.

In summary, instead of passing a law that can't be enforced in a preventative fashion with the intention of lowering accidental deaths, let's pass legislation that doesn't tell people what to do in their homes and instead gives them options that allow their children to receive a proper education in firearms safety, and build the deep respect for firearms that precludes the kind of horseplay that results in children dying.
I do apologize for making this so long, but I truly appreciate and thank you for actually considering the suggestions of your constituents.
Best regards,
Andrew Brown


(1) http://webapp.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/mortrate10_sy.html


[font="Tahoma, Arial, Sans-Serif"]From: "Loomis, Rep. Liz" <------------removed to stop spam>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 3:54 PM
To: removed to stop spam
Subject: RE: I am against HB 1014
[/font]

Mr. Brown,

Thanks for contacting my office. How do you suggest we cut down on the
number of accidental shootings each year? I would like to know your
thoughts.

Thank you for contacting my office,

LIZ LOOMIS
State Representative
44th Legislative District
PO Box 40600
Olympia, WA 98504-0600
(360) 786-7892
 

heresolong

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
1,318
Location
Blaine, WA, ,
imported post

HB 3905 letter http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=d9hbdsz_18hknpnjcz

HB 1014 letter http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=d9hbdsz_20fdg6prgz

SB 6304 letter http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=d9hbdsz_22xj34r8cz

Here are two of my letters. Managed to dump the HB 1026 prior to posting it by accident. Feel free to plagiarize. You will notice that I certainly did. I don't think you need a google account to access these but I could be wrong. Mailed these off today to my two legislators. I will get to my senator tomorrow.
 

heresolong

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
1,318
Location
Blaine, WA, ,
imported post

Check out the wording on HB1026
This bill would define a gun show as a place where three or more people gather to display or sell firearms, or where ten or more guns are offered for transfer. This is so ridiculously restrictive that someone selling off a portion of their collection would qualify as a gun show, even if they were in their house with a potential buyer of one of the firearms. Two people stopping by the house of a seller because one of them saw an ad in the paper for a firearm for sale becomes a gun show.
 

Gama

New member
Joined
Nov 12, 2007
Messages
6
Location
Bellevue, Washington, USA
imported post

HB1026 is sponsored by both of my representatives. I'm sending them a letter, and informing them (yet again) that I am watching their votes and will remember come election time.This "feel good" legislation is a waste of time since itonly adds extra charges to criminal prosecution AFTER THE FACT! BTW, I'm still trying to digest all the changes, but as an FFL03 holder how would this effect me? It appears that if I sell too many firearms, or legally transfer to a non-licensee at a "gun show" I would have to pay for a background check! Sincemy license is not a business, I think it really puts me in a grey area...



Gama
 

Morris

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
173
Location
North of Seattlle, South of Canada, Washington, US
imported post

I have lost track how many times that as a cop and state certified firearms instructor, I have sent letters to all the politicos against the bills. I had one legislator last year, some hosehead frm down south, actually get stupid with me on an e-mail (I remember posting it over at the FalFiles).

I once had Adam Kline tell me I was a dangerous man who didn't deserve to be a cop. All because I opposed a bill.

Politicians, like dog crap, need to be often cleaned up and thrown out.
 
Top