Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Idaho Statesman Opinion Piece

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Boise, Idaho, , USA
    Posts
    164

    Post imported post

    Jim Holcomb:
    Don't change: Keep loaded guns out of our national parks

    READER'S VIEW BY JIM HOLCOMB-Idaho Statesman Edition Date: 01/17/08


    The Idaho Statesman newspaper went on record with its Jan. 7 editorial in favor of allowing national park visitors to carry loaded guns. The position is in support of a letter sent by Idaho Sen. Mike Crapo to Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne advocating consistent gun rules on all federal lands.Let me give some reasons why this is not a good idea. National Parks are not just federal lands; they are places of very special national and world importance, and of special inspiration. The legislative act which established the National Park Service in 1916 provides that the park lands shall be regulated to "conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such a manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations." Other federal land management agencies, such as the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, have far different operating mandates that use the land's resources.
    Whose interest is being served by carrying loaded guns in the national parks? Certainly the interests of wildlife and historical resources are not being served, and probably not public safety. The Statesman assumes that gun owners are "law-abiding." Most of them are, but there are far too many who are not. Recently I read of a big-game sting operation conducted by the Fish and Game Department and I was amazed as to the large number of "law-abiding" shooters arrested. I hike and frequently travel the Idaho back roads and see many signs that have been riddled with gunshot. Do we want to take these problems into the parks? Come on senators and the Statesman, lets give the national parks and the park ranger a break, they are already stripped to the bone with operating funds and don't need another big job of policing loaded-gun carrying visitors. This request is a bow to the gun-carrying lobby and nothing less.
    I have two gun-carrying or hunter memories from my days of working as a park ranger at Yellowstone. Of all the times I have checked the firearms of Yellowstone visitors, not once did I receive complaints or gripes about having to place the firearm in the trunk or place a seal in the action. All contacts seemed happy to comply. The other memory is of elk illegally killed in the park. The elk were left where they fell with only the choice teeth taken.
    We are fortunate here in Idaho to have Yellowstone National Park as our neighbor. People travel across the nation and around the globe to visit this first national park in the world; it is a lifetime experience for many. Let's not change what works very well and protects the wildlife and historical resources of this valuable national heritage. I am surprised that Idaho's leaders don't feel the same way.
    Feel free to post a comment on the website pointing out flaws in this guy's "reasoning."


  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Kaneohe Bay, HI USA
    Posts
    293

    Post imported post

    Do you have a link to the article?

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Boise, Idaho, , USA
    Posts
    164

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Eagle, Idaho, USA
    Posts
    639

    Post imported post

    Not much to really say...it's the same kind of BS that people always say. "I never got any complaints before"...thats because, as you stated earlier, that most gun owners are law abiding. The people who shoot signs or damage the wildlife don't bother with the rules anyways. Personally, I don't bother with them either when it comes to my self defense.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Eagle, Idaho, USA
    Posts
    32

    Post imported post

    its really funny how classic that kind of remark is.
    its like saying that walking at night is illegal ( a stretch, i know ), while most law abiding citizens would know this and obviously arent going to break that rule, the law doesnt stop someone who is blatanly unlawful, it only stops those who actually wouldnt be up to no good from doing it

  6. #6
    Regular Member Gunslinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Free, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    3,855

    Post imported post

    "I never got any complaints before"...



    The Nazis never got complaints at Treblinka, either. Of course, they made sure the 'guests' had been disarmed before checking in. I don't plan on shooting elk with my P-90 if I go to Yellowstone. In fact, I don't plan on shooting anything--that doesn't need to be shot. What BS from this clown. Our rights go down the drain with support from gutless eunichs like this.
    "For any man who sheds his blood with me this day shall be my brother...And gentlemen now abed shall think themselves accursed, they were not here, and hold their manhoods cheap whilst any speaks who fought with us on Crispin's day." Henry V

  7. #7
    State Researcher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    340

    Post imported post

    Dang. I walk at night. Oops!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •