x2ama-gi wrote:
First off Fred Thompson is my guy, and not Mitt, but
Woooo Woooo big lie.
Come on Spin Spin Spin
Under that definition, NO ONE has lobbyists running their campaign and MultipleMitt shouldn't have bothered to even mention it.There is a world of difference between "running a campaign" and being an un-payed adviser.
What's disgusting? Romney dissembling, Romney being the plastic Mr. smiley, or the reporter calling him on it?Watching this right now. Its so disgusting.
Can anyone say IT WAS A PRESS CONFERENCE WITH LIMITED TIME AND THE REPORTER WAS BEING A COMPLETE TWAT?can anyone say FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION!
Last joke is on the press guy, of course, since his goosestep was shown on TV and all over the internet, laying his and his boss's douchebaggery bare for the whole world to see.:celebratePretty much everything. And then the way the "Press guy" takes the reporter aside. Thats bad - can anyone say FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION!
(not to mention his anti-2A stance)
You can bet that anything Keith Olberdork wants to feature won't be friendly to Republicans in general and conservatives in particular.
Something to be said for that, I guess. I think I'd take an honest and principled leftist over a lying conservative or libertarian. Exposing politicians' BS is never a negative thing, even if your political views suck.Eagle wrote:You can bet that anything Keith Olberdork wants to feature won't be friendly to Republicans in general and conservatives in particular.
Although he's an anti-gun sociaist, Olbermann has been the only mainstream news reporter who's taken King George to task on his orwellian anti-privacy powergrabs. He's much more interesting, intelligent and fair than anyone else on the 8:00 slot.