• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

the lautenberg amendment

E

Exemplar

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
26
Location
Richmond, , USA
imported post

I don't think its fair to never let a person convicted of a misdemeanor crime domestic violence serve their country or own a firearm while they let felons carry on their official duties so a felon can go to the military but a person with a misdemeanor DV cant? One can get a domestic violence charge from just arguing with ur livin mate and spraying them with a lil spit coming out of ur mouth. If a person would want to kill someone they live with they don't need a gun. I think they should take this off cause its bs. Let felons carry guns at work but not a person with a misdemeanor lol. So its ok for a convicted drug dealer that has probably destroyed many lives and killed many people with his business to serve our country? Any comments or opinions welcome

~ěXèMþLãŘ
 
M

MovinFromMD

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2007
Messages
15
Location
Fayetteville, NC, ,
imported post

I'm in the Army and actually laughed in a seniors' face when I had to sign a paper stating myability to meetthis prior to a 16 month deployment to Afghanistan. As if ever being convicted of a misdameanor will somehow cause me to go crazy while on deployment and kill everything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top