radwood
Regular Member
imported post
It seems to me that the wording of this proposal would make it really easy to limit our option to open carry. Maybe I'm just reading it wrong, but to me it says that a reasonable person would need to feel that they were in danger to open carry a firearm.
It seems to me that the wording of this proposal would make it really easy to limit our option to open carry. Maybe I'm just reading it wrong, but to me it says that a reasonable person would need to feel that they were in danger to open carry a firearm.
13-421. Justification; defensive display of a firearm; definition
A. The defensive display of a firearm by a person against another is justified when and to the extent a reasonable person would believe that physical force is immediately necessary to protect himself against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful physical force.
B. This section does not apply to a person who:
1. Points the muzzle of a firearm directly at another person.
2. Discharges a firearm in the direction of another person.
3. Intentionally provokes another person to use or attempt to use unlawful physical force when the person possesses a firearm.
4. Offensively displays or shows a firearm while verbally threatening another person.
C. For the purposes of this section, "defensive display of a firearm" includes:
1. Openly wearing, carrying or possessing a firearm.
2. Verbally informing another person that the person possesses or has available a firearm.
3. Holding a firearm in a position so that the firearm does not point directly at another person.