• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

OC or Brandishing?

RONIN

New member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
5
Location
, Washington, USA
imported post

I live in Washington and have been carrying since 16, legaly since 21 and just found out here that OC's legal. I carry a glock or desert eagle .50AE depending on how I feel or weather so obviously OC opens up more options for carry.
I dont care to fully OC I dont ever want anyone to see my weapons not to make them feel better but because it's my decision when you see my weapon.

My question is if a situation deems it, and I feel I can diffuse an escalating confrontation, is brushing my jacket or clothing aside to reveal my weapon considered brandishing my weapon?
 

vmathis12019

State Researcher
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
544
Location
Troy, Alabama, USA
imported post

Here's how I look at it. If you are CCing, that means concealed. You have made the decision to hide your weapon from sight until a situation warrants deadly force. If merely uncovering your weapon is a viable option, so is walking away. A weapon that is concealed should stay that way when it comes to diffusing a situation. If the presence of a weapon becomes NECESSARY, it had better be in your hand firing!

In short: if you think someone seeing your weapon will make you safer, then just OC. If not, be prepared to keep your weapon a secret until it's time to shoot,or you will very likely face brandishing charges.

It is also not a good idea to post on a public online forum that you spent five years of your life breaking the law. People here don't take too kindly to individuals who openly admit to disregarding the law. The term law-abiding is something we take very seriously at OCDO.
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
imported post

Welcome to OCDO!!!

I can't think of too many situations where brushing aside the cover garment to reveal the firearm would be the best tactical move.

If someone is close enough to see and notice your move to expose, and they are presenting enough threat to justify introducing the firearm, I suspect you're better off retreating (if safe and to avoid false prosecution or wrongful death civil suit), or creating distance anddrawing the gun.

If he's close enough to take notice of you exposing the gun, he can be on you before you have time to draw and fire the doctrinally required two-to-center mass. Realize you will draw back your cover garment---and then wait for his move. Which puts him in the position of acting and you reacting.

I guess one case where it might safely work is if you are being stalked by some mugging-minded crooks and you take off your jacket under a street light and pretend to look in the lining for that lottery ticket you just remembered. You then have the problem of getting to the police before the bad guys do. Some are apparently pretty savvy and not above falsely reporting that somebody just waved a gun at themat 10th and Main.
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
imported post

DrewGunner wrote:
With a big F'ing holster. If you're under 150lbs you might consider a counter-balanceso you don't tip over.

Do just like the mounted troops did with the Walker and Dragoon Colt cap-and-ball revolvers. Carry two. On horseback. :)

Carrying one in your rolling luggage lends a whole new meaning to the words towed artillery. :)
 

Sage of Seattle

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
164
Location
Boise, Idaho, , USA
imported post

RCW 9.41.270
Weapons apparently capable of producing bodily harm — Unlawful carrying or handling — Penalty — Exceptions.


(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to carry, exhibit, display, or draw any firearm, dagger, sword, knife or other cutting or stabbing instrument, club, or any other weapon apparently capable of producing bodily harm, in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons.

(2) Any person violating the provisions of subsection (1) above shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor. If any person is convicted of a violation of subsection (1) of this section, the person shall lose his or her concealed pistol license, if any. The court shall send notice of the revocation to the department of licensing, and the city, town, or county which issued the license.

(3) Subsection (1) of this section shall not apply to or affect the following:

(a) Any act committed by a person while in his or her place of abode or fixed place of business;

(b) Any person who by virtue of his or her office or public employment is vested by law with a duty to preserve public safety, maintain public order, or to make arrests for offenses, while in the performance of such duty;

(c) Any person acting for the purpose of protecting himself or herself against the use of presently threatened unlawful force by another, or for the purpose of protecting another against the use of such unlawful force by a third person;

(d) Any person making or assisting in making a lawful arrest for the commission of a felony; or

(e) Any person engaged in military activities sponsored by the federal or state governments.


------------------------------



There ya go. It wouldn't be illegal if you were being threatened, though again, I don't think I'd do it if I were CCing. Seems too much like escalation rather than deescalation...
 

BobCav

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
2,798
Location
No longer in Alexandria, Egypt
imported post

I'd say no, it's brandishing because what you described is an obvious attempt to intimidate another through a display of force. What you consider an escalation may not in fact be. Words First (1A), Weapons Second (2A)...get it?

RCW 9.41.270
Weapons apparently capable of producing bodily harm — Unlawful carrying or handling — Penalty — Exceptions.

(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to carry, exhibit, display, or draw any firearm, dagger, sword, knife or other cutting or stabbing instrument, club, or any other weapon apparently capable of producing bodily harm, in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons.

(3) Subsection (1) of this section shall not apply to or affect the following:

(a) Any act committed by a person while in his or her place of abode or fixed place of business;

(b) Any person who by virtue of his or her office or public employment is vested by law with a duty to preserve public safety, maintain public order, or to make arrests for offenses, while in the performance of such duty;

(c) Any person acting for the purpose of protecting himself or herself against the use of presently threatened unlawful force by another, or for the purpose of protecting another against the use of such unlawful force by a third person;

Key words there are AGAINST THE USE OF PRESENTLY THREATENED UNLAWFUL FORCE by another.

I would say that's a very bad move, is most certainly brandishing and most certainly escalation unlessTHEY pull a gun on you illegally. Never bring a knife to a gun fight and never bring a gun into a fist-fight unless you are reasonably afraid for your life. (tiny versusbig or many type of altercation).
 

BobCav

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
2,798
Location
No longer in Alexandria, Egypt
imported post

Sage of Seattle wrote:
There ya go. It wouldn't be illegal if you were being threatened, though again, I don't think I'd do it if I were CCing. Seems too much like escalation rather than deescalation...
Sage of Seattle wrote:
Didn't I just say that, Bob, or am I missing something?
Kind of, but I wanted to clear it up a bit because it's more than just being threatened...it's being threatenedwith an ILLEGAL WEAPON and must expose it to protect himself (i.e reaching for it in defense). Threatened with a fist or harsh words...tough up and take it, but don't pull a gun. (unless of course your tiny, he's huge or you're outnumbered and fearing for your life...)

I got the impression the OP was merely trying to force a de-escalation of asituation by introducing his weapon into the equation.It seems to me to be the old "I have a gun, I'm in control - do what I say" argument.
 

RONIN

New member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
5
Location
, Washington, USA
imported post

vmathis12019 wrote:
Here's how I look at it. If you are CCing, that means concealed. You have made the decision to hide your weapon from sight until a situation warrants deadly force. If merely uncovering your weapon is a viable option, so is walking away. A weapon that is concealed should stay that way when it comes to diffusing a situation. If the presence of a weapon becomes NECESSARY, it had better be in your hand firing!

In short: if you think someone seeing your weapon will make you safer, then just OC. If not, be prepared to keep your weapon a secret until it's time to shoot,or you will very likely face brandishing charges.

It is also not a good idea to post on a public online forum that you spent five years of your life breaking the law. People here don't take too kindly to individuals who openly admit to disregarding the law. The term law-abiding is something we take very seriously at OCDO.
Don't presume to know me or where I've lived, to the rest of you thank you for the answers to my legal questions.
 

vmathis12019

State Researcher
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
544
Location
Troy, Alabama, USA
imported post

The last thing our cause needs is people out there admitting to breaking the law. Whether your principle was well founded or not, you have OPENLY ADMITTED on a PUBLIC FORUM that you BROKE THE LAW. Don't be so naive as to think that the only participants here support our cause.

I don't presume anything about you or where you're from. You said yourself that you carried a firearm illegally. As stated above, your principles are not what I am challenging. I'm sure you had what you thought was a very good reason to carry said weapon; however, in doing so, you broke the law. The popular sentiment among the members here at OCDO is that breaking the law is WRONG.
 

unrequited

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Messages
1,407
Location
Mag-bayonettes!, Virginia, USA
imported post

BobCav wrote:
Kind of, but I wanted to clear it up a bit because it's more than just being threatened...it's being threatened with an ILLEGAL WEAPON and must expose it to protect himself (i.e reaching for it in defense).  Threatened with a fist or harsh words...tough up and take it, but don't pull a gun.  (unless of course your tiny, he's huge or you're outnumbered and fearing for your life...)

I got the impression the OP was merely trying to force a de-escalation of a situation by introducing his weapon into the equation.  It seems to me to be the old "I have a gun, I'm in control - do what I say" argument.

That's pretty much my advice as well, but there's no need I could ever see to pull my weapon without using it. If I'm feeling like my life's in danger, I'm going to back away, and retreat if possible, and verbally talk it down. If I need to draw, there's no hesitation to see whether or not the threat of counter-force is "working" to diffuse anything. Perhaps that's the wrong way to prepare myself and go about things, and that's a good debate.

As for the DE, I think it's overkill, and unless you feel confident you can hit what you're aiming with it and you won't hit anything else behind it (do they even make .50 JHP's?, I'd reconsider. But if you're OC'ing a DE for the 0_o factor, then kudos to you and more power to you. Just a pragmatic criticism and not a negative one at all.
 

RONIN

New member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
5
Location
, Washington, USA
imported post

vmathis12019 wrote:
The last thing our cause needs is people out there admitting to breaking the law. Whether your principle was well founded or not, you have OPENLY ADMITTED on a PUBLIC FORUM that you BROKE THE LAW. Don't be so naive as to think that the only participants here support our cause.

I don't presume anything about you or where you're from. You said yourself that you carried a firearm illegally. As stated above, your principles are not what I am challenging. I'm sure you had what you thought was a very good reason to carry said weapon; however, in doing so, you broke the law. The popular sentiment among the members here at OCDO is that breaking the law is WRONG.
Read it , what I wrote was I've been carrying since 16 and carried concealed with permit since 21, and you're still presuming to know where I've lived. AS for critiqing me with you're allways perfect textbook scenerios,Running does'nt allways save lives or end a situation. So let me reiterate YOU DON'T KNOW ME, MY AGE OR MY LEVEL OF TRAINING AND SKILLS!!!!!!
 
Top