danbus
Regular Member
imported post
My court is continued again until 3/25/08.
Gotta love the system.
My court is continued again until 3/25/08.
Gotta love the system.
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Quick court update
- Thread starter danbus
- Start date
danbus
Regular Member
imported post
The prosecutor wasn't in today. And the officer moved to Seattle...right after my FIRST court date.
The prosecutor wasn't in today. And the officer moved to Seattle...right after my FIRST court date.
ChinChin
Regular Member
imported post
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial"
I question this courts definition of "speedy."
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial"
I question this courts definition of "speedy."
ilbob
Campaign Veteran
imported post
ChinChin wrote:
ChinChin wrote:
In most cases the defendant can demand a speedier trial, but it is almost never truly to his benefit to do so.
Virginiaplanter
Regular Member
imported post
And you have the right to confront your accuser.
And you have the right to confront your accuser.
KBCraig
Regular Member
imported post
danbus wrote:
You've got 'em on the run, danbus!
:celebrate
danbus wrote:
You've got 'em on the run, danbus!
:celebrate
Tomahawk
Regular Member
imported post
He took the dan-bus to Seattle, har har har.
I kill me.
He took the dan-bus to Seattle, har har har.
I kill me.
sidestreet
Regular Member
imported post
LEO 229 wrote:
LEO 229 wrote:
I vote for the officer not returning! Sorry, Seattle!!Each side is allowed to have the case continued equally.
I am shocked that there was no prosecutor.
Looks like you may be getting off if the officer does not return.
kimbercarrier
Campaign Veteran
imported post
Tomahawk wrote:
Tomahawk wrote:
Tomahawk you kill me too:lol:
W.E.G.
Newbie
imported post
In before the thread hits 47 pages.
In before the thread hits 47 pages.
taurusfan
Regular Member
imported post
That's it, I suppose, the policeman is not going to show up and it will be dismissed.
Were it all worth the trouble?
I think, NOT.
That's it, I suppose, the policeman is not going to show up and it will be dismissed.
Were it all worth the trouble?
I think, NOT.
unrequited
Regular Member
imported post
W.E.G. wrote:
W.E.G. wrote:
Hah. Ditto. Well good to hear... no news is still good news.
les_aker
Regular Member
imported post
glockfan wrote:
Disagree.
glockfan wrote:
Disagree.
Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
ChinChin wrote:
Only federal jurisdictions are effectively bound by speedy trial requirements. Cases are often kept in local jurisdiction to allow for better more lengthy development that feds aren't allowed.
The case of a meth chemist in my old neighborhood hadn't been adjudicated when I moved away five years later. He still lived in the neighborhood, harassed the old ladies and caused me to frequently keep a marked unit parked in front of my residence and to OC discretely off my curtilage for the old ladies' benefit and his.
ChinChin wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedy_trial
Only federal jurisdictions are effectively bound by speedy trial requirements. Cases are often kept in local jurisdiction to allow for better more lengthy development that feds aren't allowed.
The case of a meth chemist in my old neighborhood hadn't been adjudicated when I moved away five years later. He still lived in the neighborhood, harassed the old ladies and caused me to frequently keep a marked unit parked in front of my residence and to OC discretely off my curtilage for the old ladies' benefit and his.
ChinChin
Regular Member
imported post
Doug Huffman wrote:
Doug Huffman wrote:
Doesn't change the fact that *I* question it.
Tomahawk
Regular Member
imported post
glockfan wrote:
glockfan wrote:
Didn't you use to be taurusfan, the troll who made a special effort to troll all the danbus threads?
ChinChin
Regular Member
imported post
Tomahawk wrote:
.
Tomahawk wrote:
Just like how they changed Dick York into Dick Sargent! Insidious indeed!
.
Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
Tomahawk wrote:
Good eyes, great observation!
Tomahawk wrote:
Good eyes, great observation!