Schofield
Regular Member
imported post
It's possible things have been muddled by the news. The reason the criminal shot at the clerk might have been because he suddenly noticed the clerk was carrying a gun and looked back at him. Though this still counts as "crimintal too dumb/intent to notice firearm."
And about the parent responsibility thing: I only meant that parents have a reasonable amount of responsibility to know what their kids are doing under a certain age, usually 18. If parents took more responsibility for their children instead of allowing them to become a part of the system's problem, things wouldn't be so bad.
It's possible things have been muddled by the news. The reason the criminal shot at the clerk might have been because he suddenly noticed the clerk was carrying a gun and looked back at him. Though this still counts as "crimintal too dumb/intent to notice firearm."
And about the parent responsibility thing: I only meant that parents have a reasonable amount of responsibility to know what their kids are doing under a certain age, usually 18. If parents took more responsibility for their children instead of allowing them to become a part of the system's problem, things wouldn't be so bad.