• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Clear codification of open carry moving forward in Utah legislature!

Kevin Jensen

State Researcher
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
2,313
Location
Santaquin, Utah, USA
imported post

:cuss: HB 473 with amendment 1 has passed the House. This would effectively BAN the open carry of firearms ON OR ABOUT school property. It will now go to the Senate. We need HB 473 REMOVED!!!
 

Bflamante

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
119
Location
Bountiful, Utah, USA
imported post

We need the Whips to not let this back in for vote in the House. If they dont vote then the bill dies. As currently written this one isa big problem. OK guys/gals, time to pick up the phone. Use it or lose it.


Sheldon Killpack(R)
Assistant Majority Whip

3406 South 875 West
Syracuse, Utah 84075
Home (801) 773-5486

Dan R. Eastman(R)
Majority Whip

968 Canyon Crest Dr.
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Home (801) 295-5133


Email is not going to work this late in the session. You have two days left in the session. Get crackin'.
 

utbagpiper

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,061
Location
Utah
imported post

SGT Jensen wrote:
He has amended it once again!

...


It now is worded so that is unlawful to open carry at colleges. This is not good enough!!! We must stop this NOW!

You can watch this debate LIVE! It is on Now. http://le.utah.gov/
Not just colleges, but ALL post secondary schools. The ban also applies to public and private post-secondary schools including every beauty school and auto-body school in the State. And there are NO PROVISIONS for a school to elect not to ban OC, nor any requirements to give notice. So some private property rights issues here as well. Literally, removing your jacket for an inexpensive haircut or while getting a quote on auto-body work could easily be a crime under this amendment. Walking the through the parking lot of the College of Phoenix while OCing would be a crime.

There is NO exception for private living areas like dorms. What happens when a roommate sees someone transfer a gun from a concealed holster to a storage location inside a dorm room? It isn't like the U has given us ANY reason to think they won't be as strict as the law technically allows. Indeed, their history is clearly one of going BEYOND what the law allows in this regard.

The ban on OC would apply to both INDOOR areas like classrooms as well as outdoor, completely uncontrolled areas where it is impossible to give notice of a ban on OC including sidewalks cutting through campus, parking lots, and even dorm rooms. There is no requirement for colleges to give any notice that open carry is illegal.

This has now passed the House. Contact your senators AND SENATE leadership and ask them to kill HB 473.

Charles
 

Gray Peterson

Founder's Club Member - Moderator
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
2,236
Location
Lynnwood, Washington, USA
imported post

Send a message also to Senator Waddops as well. He's been a good pro-gun person in the past. I think of all people he would see the light and kill this bill in the Senate.
 

Kevin Jensen

State Researcher
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
2,313
Location
Santaquin, Utah, USA
imported post

Lonnie Wilson wrote:
Send a message also to Senator Waddops as well. He's been a good pro-gun person in the past. I think of all people he would see the light and kill this bill in the Senate.

Done. Call Senator Waddoups at this number. 801-538-1035
 

utbagpiper

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,061
Location
Utah
imported post

SGT Jensen wrote:
I left messages with Sen. Madsen, Sen Killpack, and Sen. Eastman. Anyone else I can call?
Sen. President Valentine and Majority Leader Curt Bramble need to hear unequavably that this is an anti-RKBA bill that must not be allowed to pass the Senate.

It cannot be fixed to be otherwise. It must be stopped. The poorly conceived amendment has not recieved a single public hearing. This bill should not even get a senate vote.
 

Kevin Jensen

State Researcher
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
2,313
Location
Santaquin, Utah, USA
imported post

Senator John L. Valentine

Email


Phone
Office (801) 373-6345
Home (801) 224-1693
Fax (801) 377-4991

Address
857 East 970 North
Orem, Utah 84097

______________________


Senator Curtis S. Bramble

Email


Phone
Office (801) 373-1040
Home (801) 226-3663
Fax (801) 812-8297

Address
3663 North 870 East
Provo, Utah 84604
 

utbagpiper

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,061
Location
Utah
imported post

Code:
GOUtah!
(Gun Owners of Utah)
[url=http://mail.gawab.com/33/cgi-bin/webmail?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.goutahorg.org]http://www.goutahorg.org[/url]

Utah's Uncompromising Independent Gun Rights Network.
No Surrender.  No Retreat.  Not Now.  Not Ever.

To subscribe to or unsubscribe from these e-mail alerts, please send  
a blank e-mail message to either:  [email]goutah-subscribe@yahoogroups.com[/email]  
or [email]goutah-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com[/email]

____________________________________

GOUtah! Alert #292 – 3 March 2008


Today’s Maxim of Liberty:

"...to disarm the people - that was the best and most effectual way  
to enslave them."

--George Mason


HB 473 GETS TURNED INTO GUN-CONTROL BILL, PASSES HOUSE.  CAN STILL BE  
DEFEATED IN SENATE.

Disclaimer: We’re not lawyers.  We’re just regular guys.  So any  
interpretation we present as to what is and isn’t legal under the  
existing Utah Code is done for the purpose of analyzing the potential  
impact of certain legislation and should not be regarded as legal  
advice.  Whew!  Glad we got that out of the way!

HB 473, Rep. Curt Oda’s excellent pro-gun-rights “housekeeping bill”,  
designed to clarify the existing open-carry law without changing it,  
has been hijacked by anti-gun members of the House leadership (most  
notably House Speaker Greg Curtis and House Rules Committee Chairman  
Steve Urquhart) and amended to turn it into a gun-control bill.

The good news is that Floor Amendment 1, Sponsored by Rep. Urquhart  
and detailed in GOUtah! Alert #291 (see [url=http://mail.gawab.com/33/cgi-bin/webmail?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.goutahorg.org]http://www.goutahorg.org[/url] ),  
got killed in the House today.  This seriously anti-gun amendment was  
killed ONLY because individual gun owners like you called their  
representatives over the weekend.  Please pat yourselves on the  
back.  Had it not been for your efforts over the last couple of days,  
Floor Amendment 1 would have probably passed.

The bad news is that Rep. Urquhart replaced it with another hastily- 
drafted amendment, called House Amendment 2, which appears to be less  
restrictive than Floor Amendment 1 in terms of how it treats open and  
concealed carry, but which is still a piece of gun-control  
legislation intended, we believe, to needlessly placate the anti-gun  
administration of the University of Utah.  And it will still impose  
new restrictions on both open and concealed carry by permit holders –  
restrictions that aren’t in the current Utah Code as far as we can  
tell.  Thus, House Amendment 2 is still gun control and it still  
needs to be defeated.

HB 473 passed the House with House Amendment 2 attached to it.  Which  
means that if the bill passes the Senate as-is and gets signed into  
law by the Governor, it will cause us to lose some of our existing  
rights.  And we won’t even gain anything in return.  Not a good  
bargain, in our view.

We believe that it’s too late in the session for HB 473 to be  
restored to its original form, and that opening it up for further  
last-minute changes will just present more opportunities for mischief  
on the part of anti-gun legislators.  So we believe that HB 473 now  
needs to be killed in the Senate.  Please go to the Action Item below  
to see what you can do to help make this happen.

Our initial analysis of House Amendment 2 indicates that it appears  
to eliminate the 1,000-foot zone around schools (zones in which open  
carry would have been prohibited by the earlier amendment).  And,  
unlike the earlier amendment, House Amendment 2 defines “concealed  
carry” to include a firearm that’s concealed in a “purse, handbag,  
briefcase, or similar object carried by the permittee” (which was  
oddly defined as a form of “open carry” in Floor Amendment 1).  Also,  
House Amendment 2 does not appear to prohibit open carry by permit- 
holders on the grounds of day-care centers, pre-schools, and K-12  
schools, which was prohibited by the earlier amendment.

However, like the previous amendment, House Amendment 2 continues to  
prohibit open carry on the campuses of all public and private post- 
secondary schools, meaning vocational schools, colleges, and  
universities.  Private post-secondary schools are not even given the  
option of allowing open carry.  So if someone sets up a private  
training academy for armed security guards, with its own indoor  
shooting range, students and faculty with concealed-firearm permits  
will need to keep their weapons concealed at all times, even while  
shooting at the range.

Furthermore (and this could be a real problem), House Amendment 2  
requires that if you have a firearm concealed in a purse, briefcase,  
handbag, or “similar object”, you must actually be carrying that  
object.  Which means that if you set your purse or briefcase on the  
floor next to your seat during a lecture or while you’re in a meeting  
or while you’re on the toilet at any public or private vocational  
school, college, or university, you will be guilty of a crime.  And  
what about backpacks?  These aren’t even mentioned in House Amendment  
2, which means that we’ll just have to hope that a court somewhere,  
sometime, rules that a backpack is “similar” to a purse or briefcase.

House Amendment 2, depending on how the term “similar object” gets  
interpreted by the courts, may also prohibit an adult student with a  
CCW permit from carrying an unloaded firearm in a locked gun case or  
suitcase from his car to his dorm room.

Right now, as we interpret the existing law, public post-secondary  
schools (including the U. of U.) cannot prohibit open carry by permit  
holders, while private schools have the option of prohibiting or  
allowing it by way of school policy.  Under HB 473 as amended by  
House Amendment 2, open carry (and certain forms of concealed carry,  
as outlined above) will become automatically illegal at ALL post- 
secondary schools.

One other thing to note is that House Amendment 2 does not have any  
requirement for post-secondary schools to post signs on the premises  
indicating that open carry is prohibited.  We believe that if a piece  
of legislation creates new restrictions on the carrying of self- 
defense weapons by law-abiding citizens, the people who sponsor that  
legislation ought to at least have the decency to require the posting  
of those restrictions, as is the case, for example, with traffic  
signs at intersections where no left turn is allowed.

Note:  Floor Amendment 1 can also be referred to as “House Amendment  
1”.  We’re still calling it “Floor Amendment 1” just to be consistent  
with our previous alerts.  We’re calling the new amendment “House  
Amendment 2” because that’s how it’s now labeled on the Legislature’s  
website and we don’t want it to be confused with any floor amendments  
that might get introduced in the Senate.


ACTION ITEM

Please contact your Utah State Senator and ask him to vote against HB  
473.  There are only two days left in the legislative session, so  
it’s best to send an e-mail, or leave a message at the Senate  
switchboard, or send a fax to your senator at the Capitol, or phone  
your senator at home this evening.

Your senator’s e-mail address and home phone number can be found at  
[url=http://mail.gawab.com/33/cgi-bin/webmail?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.goutahorg.org]http://www.goutahorg.org[/url] by clicking on “Legislative Contacts”.   
Faxes and phone calls to the Capitol can be made using the following  
numbers:

Senate Switchboard: 801-538-1035
Fax for Republican senators: 801-326-1475
Fax for Democratic senators: 801-326-1476

Once you’ve done this, you may also wish to drop a brief note to  
Senate President John Valentine with the same message.

Sen. John Valentine [email]jvalentine@utahsenate.org[/email]

__________________________________________
That concludes GOUtah! Alert #292 – 3 March 2008.
Copyright 2008 by GOUtah!.  All rights reserved.



PRE-WRITTEN LETTER BELOW


----- Cut here ------


Date:

From:



To:




Dear Sen. ________________________:

As a gun owner and active voter living in your district, I encourage  
you to vote against HB 473 (Rep. Curt Oda’s “open carry” bill) as  
passed by the House.  HB 473 got changed on the House Floor from a  
good bill into a bad bill by way of a hostile amendment (House  
Amendment 2).  The original bill was a simple and well-written  
housekeeping bill designed to clarify the existing law without  
changing it.  The modified bill as passed by the House actually  
introduces new restrictions on the carrying of legally possessed  
firearms (both openly and concealed) by permit holders – restrictions  
that don’t exist in the current law.  Even certain forms of concealed- 
carry would become a criminal act under House Amendment 1, such as  
setting one’s purse or briefcase on the floor next to one’s seat  
during a college lecture if the purse or briefcase contains an  
otherwise legally concealed self-defense weapon.

This bill, as passed by the House, also represents a needless cave-in  
to the anti-gun administration of the University of Utah, which has  
repeatedly disobeyed state gun laws and thumbed its nose at the  
Legislature.

Thus, I believe that HB 473 in its current form needs to be allowed  
to die in the Senate.

Thanks for taking time to consider my opinion on this matter.  Please  
get back to me after the session to let me know how you voted on this  
legislation.

Sincerely,






------- Cut here -------









To Subscribe, send a blank message to: 
[email]goutah-subscribe@yahoogroups.com[/email]



To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: 
[email]goutah-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com[/email] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
[url=http://mail.gawab.com/33/cgi-bin/webmail?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fgroups.yahoo.com%2Fgroup%2Fgoutah%2F]http://groups.yahoo.com/group/goutah/[/url]

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
[url=http://mail.gawab.com/33/cgi-bin/webmail?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fgroups.yahoo.com%2Fgroup%2Fgoutah%2Fjoin]http://groups.yahoo.com/group/goutah/join[/url]
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
[url=http://mail.gawab.com/33/cgi-bin/webmail/efta7824080C4CEA914969D7909C9405310A9/bagpiper@gawab.com?basepage=readmsg&folder=INBOX&form=newmsg&to=goutah-digest@yahoogroups.com]mailto:goutah-digest@yahoogroups.com[/url] 
[url=http://mail.gawab.com/33/cgi-bin/webmail/efta7824080C4CEA914969D7909C9405310A9/bagpiper@gawab.com?basepage=readmsg&folder=INBOX&form=newmsg&to=goutah-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com]mailto:goutah-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com[/url]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email]goutah-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com[/email]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
[url=http://mail.gawab.com/33/cgi-bin/webmail?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fdocs.yahoo.com%2Finfo%2Fterms%2F]http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/[/url]
 

utbagpiper

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,061
Location
Utah
imported post

SGT Jensen wrote:
I am sending emails to the senators. Is it worth my time to send them to the Democrats? Reworded, perhaps?
If you have the time, yes. There are a couple of pro-gun democrats. The late Sen. Ed Mayne was very good on guns and so we might hope his widow, the current Sen. Mayne would be as well. Mike Dmitrich is also generally good on guns.

Furthermore, if the democrats get pro-gun contacts, they are not as easily able to (honestly) claim that everyone contacting them wants them to attack our rights.

Charles
 

Gray Peterson

Founder's Club Member - Moderator
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
2,236
Location
Lynnwood, Washington, USA
imported post

Well good.

I've heard reports that University of Utah is going after students who have accidental exposures. When will people start fighting back against this obvious violation of their rights under the UT Constitution?
 
Top