• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

New Pamphlet on CA Open Carry

O

oc4ever

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
280
Location
, ,
imported post

My only point is that these pamphlets are freely distributed , even to LEO's for their information. If you were stopped 600 feet away from a school with a unloaded rifle in the front of your truck(car) , and handed this information to a local P.O., the pamphlet may confuse him into thinking you were in violation of 629.6.

He probably does not have a FBI agent in the trunk of his patrol car to arrest you on a Federal charge. Lets skip rules regarding the Federal GFSZ if your quoting 629.6 in the pamphlet. The Federal GFSZ, was discussed regarding long guns before on this forum, and believe does not apply to long guns. If it does, I stand corrected, just kindly show me the part where the federal GFSZ does, or does not exempt them.
 
C

CA_Libertarian

State Researcher
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
2,585
Location
Stanislaus County, California, USA
imported post

I also wonder if you'd mind collecting relevant case law somewhere on your website. Google isn't great for finding obscure cases, so maybe making the case law more accessible will be helpful.

I have 5 cases (the most relevant ones, IMO) saved to my hard drive in either PDF or DOC formats. If you're interested, PM me and I'll e-mail them to you.
 
MudCamper

MudCamper

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Messages
709
Location
Sebastopol, California, USA
imported post

CA_Libertarian wrote:
I also wonder if you'd mind collecting relevant case law somewhere on your website. Google isn't great for finding obscure cases, so maybe making the case law more accessible will be helpful.

I have 5 cases (the most relevant ones, IMO) saved to my hard drive in either PDF or DOC formats. If you're interested, PM me and I'll e-mail them to you.
Click to expand...
That is exactly what I am doing here: http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum12/36464.html

See the second post in that thread.

And please, if you have suggestions for additions, let me know.
 
MudCamper

MudCamper

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Messages
709
Location
Sebastopol, California, USA
imported post

coolusername2007 wrote:
MudCamper wrote:
That is exactly what I am doing here: http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum12/36464.html

See the second post in that thread.

And please, if you have suggestions for additions, let me know.
Click to expand...
MC, still don't see the educational brochure I created. I'm beginning to think you don't like it.
Click to expand...
Just noticed this post, after I linked it, so no, it's not that I don't like it. I just hadn't dug it up yet. Although, while you refer to it as an "educational" pamphlet, I find mine and Decoligny's to be more "educational" as they include all code and case law one needs to know, and your's is more of an inspirational, historical, and public relations type publication.

But the more the merrier. Different styles work better on different people.
 
coolusername2007

coolusername2007

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2009
Messages
1,659
Location
Temecula, California, USA
imported post

MudCamper wrote:
coolusername2007 wrote:
MudCamper wrote:
That is exactly what I am doing here: http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum12/36464.html

See the second post in that thread.

And please, if you have suggestions for additions, let me know.
Click to expand...
MC, still don't see the educational brochure I created. I'm beginning to think you don't like it.
Click to expand...
Just noticed this post, after I linked it, so no, it's not that I don't like it. I just hadn't dug it up yet. Although, while you refer to it as an "educational" pamphlet, I find mine and Decoligny's to be more "educational" as they include all code and case law one needs to know, and your's is more of an inspirational, historical, and public relations type publication.

But the more the merrier. Different styles work better on different people.
Click to expand...

Thanks for linking it. They are both educational, they are just intended for different audiences. I have no problem with you posting it as a PR brochure.

ETA: But the title is Open Carry and the 2nd Amendment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top