• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Great Documentary on Gun Ownership

SouthernBoy

Regular Member
Joined
May 12, 2007
Messages
5,837
Location
Western Prince William County, Virginia, USA
imported post

Wow! Excellent, thanks so much for posting this link.

What the anti's just do not understand is what was shown in this film time and again. That governments, all governments, are inherently evil. And the only thing that keeps them from going over the edge is an armed and vigilant populous. Herein lies the primary reason for the Second Amendment.. to control government and send out the message that the people can and will throw them out, with force of arms if needed, should them continue on a path injurious to our future.

Thanks again.
 

LEO 229

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
7,606
Location
USA
imported post

Interesting documentary.

I can agree with everything the guy talked about.

I have posted already that the people SHOULD be armed.
 

sjhipple

Regular Member
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
1,491
Location
Concord, New Hampshire, USA
imported post

unrequited wrote:
This documentary was very upsetting and very graphic. It's well worth watching, thanks for the heads up.

If you want to show it to friends and family, you can buy it on DVDHERE.



What the guy at the end says is so true. If you don't want this to happen, make sure that no government has more power than the people.
 

deepdiver

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
5,820
Location
Southeast, Missouri, USA
imported post

Good video. Makes the point well that power corrupts and absolutley power corrupts absolutely. A government only need disarm a popultion it fears, and it only need fear the population if government's goals are no longer those of the people. Notice that liberals/progressives are the ones who want to disarm the people. Also notice they are the ones who scream about everyone having rights while quietly working to limit or eliminate those rights that do not assist them in gaining power and control. Disgusting and frightening.
 

sjhipple

Regular Member
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
1,491
Location
Concord, New Hampshire, USA
imported post

deepdiver wrote:
Notice that liberals/progressives are the ones who want to disarm the people.
It wasn't "liberals or progressives" that filed a Department of Justice brief telling the Court to not enforce the 2nd Amendment. It was Bush's DOJ.
 

Neplusultra

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2007
Messages
2,224
Location
Christiansburg, Virginia, USA
imported post

Louisiana Carry wrote:
I did not know about this video until you posted it.

I managed to get the link in front of about 3000 people since yesterday. Will continue trying to expose it to more people.
Wow, excellent. I thought it was pretty good especially with the graphic nature of some of the photos since they really drive home the evilness of these systems.
 

imperialism2024

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
3,047
Location
Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, USA
imported post

ama-gi wrote:
deepdiver wrote:
Notice that liberals/progressives are the ones who want to disarm the people.
It wasn't "liberals or progressives" that filed a Department of Justice brief telling the Court to not enforce the 2nd Amendment. It was Bush's DOJ.

Ooo burn!

In all seriousness though, while all the cool kids paint Democrats as the evil gun-grabbers, Republicans will only hold onto our side of the gun rights debate so long as it is convenient to their other, more deeply-seated goals. The only definitive ideals that the two major political parties use to decide their positions anymore is that the Democrats are for turning the USA into the UK, and the Republicans are for turning the USA into a Christian version of Saudi Arabia. Any other issues are just temporary and tools to achieve those goals. In case the erosion of other rights wasn't evidence enough, Mr. Bush's position on this case demonstrates that the GOP regards gun rights primarily as a way to get votes from those gun owners who have yet to fall victim to the "Second Amendment is the Right to Hunt" mentality.
 

Louisiana Carry

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
374
Location
Keithville, Louisiana, USA
imported post

Neplusultra wrote:
Louisiana Carry wrote:
I did not know about this video until you posted it.

I managed to get the link in front of about 3000 people since yesterday. Will continue trying to expose it to more people.
Wow, excellent. I thought it was pretty good especially with the graphic nature of some of the photos since they really drive home the evilness of these systems.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=681596

One of the threads I have started about it.

That one is up to 3370 views in 24 hours. :D
 

deepdiver

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
5,820
Location
Southeast, Missouri, USA
imported post

I didn't say democrats, I said liberals and progressives. Also, while Bush is a republican, he is not a conservative on many issues and is a borderline RINO overall. Bush has shown his liberal colors on several occasions, especially on illegal immigration and the DOJ's intrusion into Heller v DC. Furthermore, a majority of conservatives are not evangelical Christians although most evangelical Christians are conservatives. I stand by my comment.
 

Joe Sixpack

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
83
Location
, ,
imported post

had a few bad spots where the sound or video skipped or simply jumped ahead..

over all it's not to bad.. although i believe it to be factual i'd actually call this more propaganda then documentary.. the reason is the way it's shot.. it's one sided (not that im saying it's wrong) but documenters should be neutral, and it seemed like it was try to drill it into your head in a almost subliminal way.

i give a "C"
 

sjhipple

Regular Member
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
1,491
Location
Concord, New Hampshire, USA
imported post

Joe Sixpack wrote:
over all it's not to bad.. although i believe it to be factual i'd actually call this more propaganda then documentary.. the reason is the way it's shot.. it's one sided (not that im saying it's wrong) but documenters should be neutral, and it seemed like it was try to drill it into your head in a almost subliminal way.
Every time I watch a JPFO documentary, I always think, "wow, what a great idea! If only they'd hired a professional to make it."
 

sjhipple

Regular Member
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
1,491
Location
Concord, New Hampshire, USA
imported post

Joe Sixpack wrote:
over all it's not to bad.. although i believe it to be factual i'd actually call this more propaganda then documentary.. the reason is the way it's shot.. it's one sided (not that im saying it's wrong) but documenters should be neutral, and it seemed like it was try to drill it into your head in a almost subliminal way.
Every time I watch a JPFO documentary, I always think, "wow, what a great idea! If only they'd hired a professional to make it."
 

deepdiver

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
5,820
Location
Southeast, Missouri, USA
imported post

Joe Sixpack wrote:
had a few bad spots where the sound or video skipped or simply jumped ahead..

over all it's not to bad.. although i believe it to be factual i'd actually call this more propaganda then documentary.. the reason is the way it's shot.. it's one sided (not that im saying it's wrong) but documenters should be neutral, and it seemed like it was try to drill it into your head in a almost subliminal way.

i give a "C"
C
I was really frustrated with that skip at the end about the Carpenter murders. I tried all sorts of stuff in case it were in my end, but I think it is an error in the upload since others are having the same problem. I would like to see it without that break in it.

Considering that there hasn't been a "documentary" up for any Hollywood award (oscar or otherwise) in probably at least a decade that wasn't leftist propoganda, I think that within the modern definition of "documentary" as established by those who make them, this would qualify as an honest to God documentary. Micheal Moore advertises his anti-American mostly incorrect hit pieces as documentaries and they are not nearly as honest as this one was.

But then all that being said, in the big picture I agree with you, Joe, as to what a documentary should be and with that view I absolutely see your points. I would argue that this "documentary" is probably more akin to a "news" program on Cee it's BS such as 20/20 or 48 Hours than it is to a genuine documentary.
 

Pointman

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Messages
1,422
Location
, ,
imported post

It's a long video, but a good one. Thanks for posting the link.
 
Top