bohdi
Regular Member
imported post
http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/03/06/nj.school.plot/index.html
This is an interesting story. On one hand the dad probaby feels (or was maybe pressured) into turning over the guns because of his son's behavior. However if they had a safe and whether or not the kid had the combo, I don't know that there is a need to turn over the weapons. My kids don't know the combo, I am not likely to turn over the weapons - sure it might look good from a PR point of view, but if the danger is already limited, what's the point? Is the DA going to go harder on the kid for not cooperating when the parents haven't really done anything wrong other than maybe not pay as close attention to their kid as they should have been?
http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/03/06/nj.school.plot/index.html
This is an interesting story. On one hand the dad probaby feels (or was maybe pressured) into turning over the guns because of his son's behavior. However if they had a safe and whether or not the kid had the combo, I don't know that there is a need to turn over the weapons. My kids don't know the combo, I am not likely to turn over the weapons - sure it might look good from a PR point of view, but if the danger is already limited, what's the point? Is the DA going to go harder on the kid for not cooperating when the parents haven't really done anything wrong other than maybe not pay as close attention to their kid as they should have been?