-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Keep hiting this poll on restaurant carry!
- Thread starter Mike
- Start date
CrossFire
Regular Member
imported post
I do not know who wrote that article but he seems to be living in a society of his own and not even related to reality.
I do not know who wrote that article but he seems to be living in a society of his own and not even related to reality.
saluney
New member
imported post
Ballot Cast
Ballot Cast
Smurfologist
Regular Member
imported post
Hit it!
2nd Amendment...........Use it...........Or, lose it!!:X
Hit it!
2nd Amendment...........Use it...........Or, lose it!!:X
longwatch
Founder's Club Member - Moderator
imported post
hit
hit
sccrref
Regular Member
imported post
it has been hit.
it has been hit.
Skeptic
Founder's Club Member
imported post
CrossFire wrote:
CrossFire wrote:
his version of reality is apparently based on a socialst progressive totalitarian's wet dream
Spectre
Regular Member
imported post
Done and done.
269 Yes
9 No
Done and done.
269 Yes
9 No
ODA 226
Regular Member
imported post
96.1 FOR! :celebrate
3.8 Against
96.1 FOR! :celebrate
3.8 Against
Tomahawk
Regular Member
imported post
We're annihilating that poll.
We're annihilating that poll.
zoom6zoom
Regular Member
imported post
Shredded.
96.4% in our favor.
3.5% Blissninnies.
Shredded.
96.4% in our favor.
3.5% Blissninnies.
deepdiver
Campaign Veteran
imported post
done ...
The author of that piece not only does not understand current events, but also has no understanding or correct information about US history. I think the only honest part of the piece was about conjuring up Hollywood images. Obviously the editor writing that piece is mentally unstable enough to believe that what s/he sees at the movies and on TV is in any way, shape or form a remotely honest portrayl of reality. Dumba$$.
ETA: Forgot to complain about the "We want our law enforcement officers to carry weapons for our defense if necessary" comment. Obviously, all of us here on the forum are well aware that the supreme court has said since the 1840s that LE has NO obligation to defend any individual citizen. You would think that a newspaper editor, before spewing utter BS publicly, would spend just a few minutes informing his/herself on the friggin' issue. Did I mention dumba$$?
done ...
The author of that piece not only does not understand current events, but also has no understanding or correct information about US history. I think the only honest part of the piece was about conjuring up Hollywood images. Obviously the editor writing that piece is mentally unstable enough to believe that what s/he sees at the movies and on TV is in any way, shape or form a remotely honest portrayl of reality. Dumba$$.
ETA: Forgot to complain about the "We want our law enforcement officers to carry weapons for our defense if necessary" comment. Obviously, all of us here on the forum are well aware that the supreme court has said since the 1840s that LE has NO obligation to defend any individual citizen. You would think that a newspaper editor, before spewing utter BS publicly, would spend just a few minutes informing his/herself on the friggin' issue. Did I mention dumba$$?
Neplusultra
Regular Member
imported post
What happened to the comments? I just checked the page again and they're gone!
What happened to the comments? I just checked the page again and they're gone!
Skeptic
Founder's Club Member
imported post
Neplusultra wrote:
Neplusultra wrote:
For some reason when you follow the link from here it does not show the comments, but from the front page of the paper the URL is a little different and it shows the comments.
casullshooter
Regular Member
imported post
Blood will be all over the walls and floors..........how many times does this theory have to be disproved?:cuss:
97% in our favor though.........
Blood will be all over the walls and floors..........how many times does this theory have to be disproved?:cuss:
97% in our favor though.........
sjhipple
Regular Member
imported post
The link above doesn't show the comments on the article for some reason. If you'd like to see them click on this link.
The link above doesn't show the comments on the article for some reason. If you'd like to see them click on this link.
DoubleR
Campaign Veteran
imported post
Thanks ama-gi. Every comment is a good one, too. That Op-Ed read like it was from a child in elementary school.
Thanks ama-gi. Every comment is a good one, too. That Op-Ed read like it was from a child in elementary school.
imported post
97.6%[font="Verdana,Arial"][font="Verdana,Arial"] [/font][font="Verdana,Arial"]Yes. I agree with the bill.[/font][/font]
2.3% [font="Verdana,Arial"][font="Verdana,Arial"] No. Governor Kaine was right to veto the bill.[/font][font="Verdana,Arial"]
[/font][font="Verdana,Arial"]So much for our Governor representing the people.
yata hey
[/font][/font]
97.6%[font="Verdana,Arial"][font="Verdana,Arial"] [/font][font="Verdana,Arial"]Yes. I agree with the bill.[/font][/font]
2.3% [font="Verdana,Arial"][font="Verdana,Arial"] No. Governor Kaine was right to veto the bill.[/font][font="Verdana,Arial"]
[/font][font="Verdana,Arial"]So much for our Governor representing the people.
yata hey
[/font][/font]
Tomahawk
Regular Member
imported post
Well, the antis would say, and not without reason, "So much for the governor representing gun rights activists who hit polls multiple times to jack up the numbers."
Reason I say is because some folks on this forum have bragged about doing so.
Not that I have a problem with that; the antis would do it if they were as organized and had our numbers, but let's be honest about the nature of these pop polls.
Well, the antis would say, and not without reason, "So much for the governor representing gun rights activists who hit polls multiple times to jack up the numbers."
Reason I say is because some folks on this forum have bragged about doing so.
Not that I have a problem with that; the antis would do it if they were as organized and had our numbers, but let's be honest about the nature of these pop polls.