Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Like we need more proof Obama is anti-2A

  1. #1
    Campaign Veteran deepdiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Southeast, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    5,974

    Post imported post

    Outrage Of The Week -- Political Hypocrisy By Obama Friday, March 07, 2008 A March 2 commentary in National Review Online (NRO) demonstrates the hypocrisy that often abounds in the campaigns of anti-Second Amendment candidates. This time, the transgressor is Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama.
    In his NRO column, Jim Geraghty recalls how a few years ago, Obama (then a state senator) proposed enactment of a federal law prohibiting licensed gun dealers from operating within five miles of a school or park. Of course, considering the geography of most cities and towns, banning a lawful business operation within a five-mile radius of a school or park would very often amount to an outright ban on those businesses.
    While that endeavor certainly demonstrates his disdain for FFLs and their legitimate business, another vote demonstrates Obama’s apparent tolerance for what others would no doubt consider controversial businesses. On a Senate bill to prohibit sex-related shops to operate within a five-mile radius of schools or houses of worship (which failed), Obama took a pass, and voted “present.”
    The Obama spin: He was trying to avoid mandates on local authorities!
    Advocating a law to forbid federally licensed gun dealers from legally selling constitutionally-protected products, while showing support for, or, at minimum, indifference to, holding purveyors of pornography to the same standard is not only hypocritical, it’s outrageous!
    http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Fe...d.aspx?id=3648


    Bob Owens @ Bearing Arms (paraphrased): "These people aren't against violence; they're very much in favor of violence. They're against armed resistance."

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    3,047

    Post imported post

    Just a matter of picking and choosing which amendments one chooses to support. I'm sure you'll find hypocrisy in the other direction from the average neo-con Republican... but no one cares, because the anti-sex "for the children" argument is valid to them.

    I see the author's point, but unfortunately he uses a tool that only libertarians and statists can use without being hypocritical themselves.

  3. #3
    Campaign Veteran deepdiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Southeast, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    5,974

    Post imported post

    I didn't post it because of the hypocrisy argument. I posted it for further information about Obama's voting history and stances regarding 2A rights. I should have clarified better. I readily agree that both primary parties have their fair share of hypocrisy to answer for and that being a hypocrite is not unique to any particular party.
    Bob Owens @ Bearing Arms (paraphrased): "These people aren't against violence; they're very much in favor of violence. They're against armed resistance."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •